Posted on 11/07/2012 9:44:33 PM PST by Nachum
Now that the 2012 presidential election is over and Barack Obama has been safely reelected, the journalists at ABC's Good Morning America woke up to the fact that the President has "refused" to provide details the terrorist attack in Libya and that the administration "didn't want to talk about it." [See video below. MP3 audio here.]
Fill-in host Elizabeth Vargas blithely announced, "In the meantime, the Libya issue has been overhanging this election. Allegations of a, quote, massive cover-up, by Senator John McCain about this administration's, really, refusal to really put to rest this issue before voting day." Martha Raddatz, who moderated the vice presidential debate, agreed, saying, "They didn't want to talk about it. Everybody tried to pin them down on that. They did not want to talk about it." "Everybody" tried to pin them down on Libya?
(Excerpt) Read more at newsbusters.org ...
State run media
Some sort of “impeachment insurance” begins.
FABC
Vargas is a dumb tramp who spent to many drunk nights in bars wrapping her legs on any thing her drunken blurred eyes could remotely focus on.
All the media twits are teleprompter reading idiots. They covered this issue up and now will lightly glaze over it to say the exposed it on their shows.
The bigger problem is only 53 or so Congressional members have stepped up demanding answers. How many republicans are in the House???
The MSM could very well turn on Ozero and shred him over
Benghazi. The did this to Billy in his second term.
LOL!! nope— they will do faux investigating and then EXONERATE him!!
I totally agree
There was no surprise about the attack. There was no 'failure of intel.' The attack was predicted in precise detail a month before it occurred. The draw down of security had to be intentional.
CIA Sources: Obama ordered military not to help Ambassador Stevens
The failure to approve a rescue had to be intentional.
Sources: Key task force not convened during Benghazi consulate attack
Keeping the Counterterrorism Security Group (CSG) in the dark about the attack had to be intentional.
Tweeting apologies for the 'anti-Muhammed video' beginning early that morning, repeatedly blaming all the violence at all of our embassies on the 'video' and making an apology video to air in Pakistan had to be intentional.
Stevens presence in Benghazi on 9-11 had to be intentional.
(Here's what they say to themselves) Well look what we have here? Where did all this info come from? Who was hiding it from us? We're going to get to the bottom of this,....ONEDAY.
Oh well, Old news now, no one interested,.....NEXT issue?
Why should they upset the applecart they just filled? They would be torn to pieces by the still rejoicing Obama crowd. My guerss is that even the Republican are wondering whether they should pursue this matter. Any serious investigation would be construed as an effort to overturn the election, and therefore illegitimate.
If anything serious happens, it will look like the Pearl Harbour investigation. To this day we dont know if the head shed was guilty of exposing Pearl to attack. Short and Kimbell were sacrificial goats: that we know. But that’s about the size of it.
Hard to say if they will shred or protect Obama, but they will start going after stories. It get pretty boring talking/lying about how wonderful things are.
Before the election, I heard on CBS radio newsbreaks that everything was great in NY and NJ. Now that the election is over, suddenly I’m hearing that people are without power and supplies while a storm is headed their way.
Those ugly pricks ignored the facts just long enough.
Expect tohear more stories come out now that the election is over.
Yesterday, I heard some in the press finally admit that the so called “recovery” is being propped up by QE
The “impeachment insurance” is Joe Biden!!!...Duh!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.