Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama Calls for Amendment Limiting Free-Speech Rights
CNSNews ^

Posted on 08/30/2012 12:01:02 PM PDT by Sub-Driver

Obama Calls for Amendment Limiting Free-Speech Rights By Matt Cover August 30, 2012

(CNSNews.com) – President Barack Obama endorsed a constitutional amendment that would restrict the free-speech rights of political activist groups by overturning the Supreme Court decision in the landmark Citizens United v FEC case that granted First Amendment rights to corporations.

“Over the longer term, I think we need to seriously consider mobilizing a constitutional amendment process to overturn Citizens United,” Obama wrote during a question and answer session on the website Reddit on Wednesday.

“Even if the amendment process falls short, it can shine a spotlight of the super-PAC phenomenon and help apply pressure for change.”

In its decision, the Supreme Court said that the government could not restrict the free-speech rights of organizations during elections, striking down key provisions of the McCain-Feingold campaign finance law.

That law restricted how much money independent political organizations could spend and banned them from engaging in election-related speech 60 days prior to a general election.

In his concurring opinion, Chief Justice John Roberts wrote that the government was arguing for direct censorship of political speech, asking the court to allow the banning of books, pamphlets, and any other type of speech the government deemed necessary.

“The Government urges us in this case to uphold a direct prohibition on political speech,” Roberts wrote. “It asks us to embrace a theory of the First Amendment that would allow censorship not only of television and radio broadcasts, but of pamphlets, posters, the Internet, and virtually any other medium that corporations and unions might find useful in expressing their views on matters of public concern.

(Excerpt) Read more at cnsnews.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: citizensunited; corporations; dictatorship; executiveorders; freespeech; politicalspeech; rulebyfiat; tyranny
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-89 next last
To: Sub-Driver

If Øbozo really wanted this he would just snap his bony fingers and declare it done. It isn’t like he has any use for or respect of the Constitution.


41 posted on 08/30/2012 1:41:35 PM PDT by rockrr (Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
I just posted an email from nobama in which John F'ing Skerry, the designated shill, complained, "This year, the Romney campaign and super PACs have promised to spend more than $1 billion."

Fine.

There's nothing preventing nobama from fighting fire with fire, is there?

42 posted on 08/30/2012 1:47:07 PM PDT by upchuck ("Definition of 'racist:' someone that is winning an argument with a liberal." ~ Peter Brimelow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

He isn’t going to get it and he knows it. Its just propaganda for his base. Kind of like the gop saying they’ll pass a balanced budget amendment.


43 posted on 08/30/2012 1:56:39 PM PDT by RKBA Democrat (WILLARD 2012 - It's not just a campaign, it's a conservative suicide pact!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
To understand why Obama is now in favor of limiting SuperPac's one needs only look at his record.

IN 2008, the Obama campaign used SuperPacs so effectively, they out-spent the McCain campaign almost 4:1. Not a peep was heard from Obama about those "evil SuperPacs" back then.

Now that Romney is out fund-raising and outspending OBAMA, Obama cries foul!

Those are the clear, undisputed facts of the matter here folks. Obama only cries when he's beaten at his own game. WAAAAAAAA!!!!!

44 posted on 08/30/2012 2:00:53 PM PDT by usconservative (When The Ballot Box No Longer Counts, The Ammunition Box Does. (What's In Your Ammo Box?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

With Judge Roberts now under obamm’s control, this would have no problem clearing the USSC.


45 posted on 08/30/2012 2:06:19 PM PDT by rawhide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
——McCain-Feingold campaign finance law—

The reason I loath McCain...almost as much as Obama

The way to fix campaign finance is to make it 100 % transparent...

No more money to PAC or political bodies to hide donations...

Give any amount to a CANDIDATE and they must report it in 24 hours...don't report a donation...you pay 10 X the donation in fines

Everybody and God will know who is getting what from whom...

46 posted on 08/30/2012 2:13:01 PM PDT by Popman (In a place you only dream of Where your soul is always free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: usconservative

True that. And this will never happen anyway. Citizen’s United was the right decision. It helps the right counter the media bias and quite frankly, why shouldn’t more money mean you get louder speech? You got a bigger megaphone!

If they don’t like it, as Scalia says, turn off the tv.


47 posted on 08/30/2012 2:17:02 PM PDT by rudabaga
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs

” This is nothing new, the Dems hate citizen’s united decision. It drives them mad. Obama yelled at the SCOTUS over it at the SOTU. This is just to get lib base donations.”

Yep, just more BS.


48 posted on 08/30/2012 2:21:00 PM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (God, family, country, mom, apple pie, the girl next door and a Ford F250 to pull my boat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
"... the Supreme Court decision in the landmark Citizens United v FEC case that granted First Amendment rights to corporations."

What shoddy writing. The courts never "grant" rights to anyone. Rights are never granted, they are in self-evident existence.

49 posted on 08/30/2012 2:25:46 PM PDT by fwdude ( You cannot compromise with that which you must defeat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Oh, joy! Thank you, Dear Leader! Soon we will all be free of freedom!


50 posted on 08/30/2012 2:28:58 PM PDT by Eleutheria5 (End the occupation. Annex today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Good luck getting 2/3 of each house and 3/4 of state legislatures to go along with that, Barry.


51 posted on 08/30/2012 2:35:18 PM PDT by AuH2ORepublican (If a politician won't protect innocent babies, what makes you think that he'll protect your rights?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AuH2ORepublican

Here is how his stump speech will go: Corporate this. Corporate that. Corporation. Greed. Narrow special interests. Corporate. It won’t pass, but its failure to pass will be a springboard for reviving a phony issue.


52 posted on 08/30/2012 2:46:01 PM PDT by Eleutheria5 (End the occupation. Annex today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Obama Calls for Amendment Limiting Free-Speech Rights

This clown all ready knows that he has discovered that with a gutless GOP congress (and House speaker) he can write and issue any law he wants with impunity. No stinkn' amendment will be required if you just give him another FOUR.


53 posted on 08/30/2012 2:46:17 PM PDT by Cheerio (Barry Hussein Soetoro-0bama=The Complete Destruction of American Capitalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Real Cynic No More

“John McCain, as well as Obama, will be happy if Citizens United is overturned.
Actually, the USSC did overturn Citizens United. What Obama wants is limitations on free speech so that Citizens United can be re-enacted.”

You misunderstood me, which means I didn’t make myself clear here. I meant if Obama and his henchmen somehow were able to get a bill passed overturning the USSC’s decision, and it ended up going back through the courts again. Obama and McCain both want this re-litigated or overturned in Congress somehow. They are both on the same side of this issue.


54 posted on 08/30/2012 2:58:11 PM PDT by flaglady47 (When the gov't fears the people, liberty; When the people fear the gov't, tyranny.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Real Cynic No More

“John McCain, as well as Obama, will be happy if Citizens United is overturned.
Actually, the USSC did overturn Citizens United. What Obama wants is limitations on free speech so that Citizens United can be re-enacted.”

You misunderstood me, which means I didn’t make myself clear here. I meant if Obama and his henchmen somehow were able to get a bill passed overturning the USSC’s decision, and it ended up going back through the courts again. Obama and McCain both want this re-litigated or overturned in Congress somehow. They are both on the same side of this issue.


55 posted on 08/30/2012 2:58:32 PM PDT by flaglady47 (When the gov't fears the people, liberty; When the people fear the gov't, tyranny.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Designed to cut off the feet of organizations like the NRA and Heritage Foundation.


56 posted on 08/30/2012 3:20:32 PM PDT by wastedyears (The First Law of Heavy Metal: Not all metal is satanic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thingumbob

They don’t have the slightest obligation to prove they’re
“the tolerant ones”, once they’ve convinced enough people, with the help of he MSM, that WE are “the “INtolerant ones”.It’s a process that has been underway for some years, and one they’re still mystifyingly winning.


57 posted on 08/30/2012 3:20:45 PM PDT by supremedoctrine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: usconservative

“Those are the clear, undisputed facts of the matter here folks. Obama only cries when he’s beaten at his own game. WAAAAAAAA!!!!!”

Bears repeating....

Furthermore, let the chump gnaw on some of that government cheese to go with all of his pitiful commie whining.


58 posted on 08/30/2012 3:32:27 PM PDT by A Voice (Few men desire liberty; most men wish only for a just master. -- Sallust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

I don’t agree about limiting free speech but I am seriously hoping OButtwad will be making a lot less speeches on January 21st,2013.


59 posted on 08/30/2012 3:38:28 PM PDT by Leep (I'm a Chic-Fil--A-merican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Thank god our founders made it impossible to amend the Constitution..


60 posted on 08/30/2012 4:03:10 PM PDT by KevinDavis (Romney / Ryan 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-89 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson