Skip to comments.
Conservative pundits turn down Newt
Politico ^
Posted on 12/09/2011 11:04:00 AM PST by Sub-Driver
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-111 next last
To: Sub-Driver
Source: Politico
(’nuff said...)
2
posted on
12/09/2011 11:05:39 AM PST
by
SumProVita
(Cogito, ergo...Sum Pro Vita. (Modified Decartes))
To: Sub-Driver
And Newt doesn’t have a nice crease in his pants...
3
posted on
12/09/2011 11:05:49 AM PST
by
miss marmelstein
(Still heartless after all these years...)
To: Sub-Driver
4
posted on
12/09/2011 11:07:06 AM PST
by
ILS21R
(Never give up)
To: Sub-Driver
Multiple conservative pundits to Pollutico is David Brooks.
LMBO!
5
posted on
12/09/2011 11:07:14 AM PST
by
dforest
To: Sub-Driver
Don’t really care much for the conservative opinion ELITE
or what they think.
6
posted on
12/09/2011 11:07:14 AM PST
by
sanjuanbob
(Festina Lente)
To: Sub-Driver
We’re so lucky to have these people to tell us what to do.
7
posted on
12/09/2011 11:08:04 AM PST
by
SaxxonWoods
(....The days are long, but the years are short.....)
To: Sub-Driver
To: SumProVita
I love it when leftist sites tell us who Conservatives are.
9
posted on
12/09/2011 11:09:32 AM PST
by
DebraAI
To: Sub-Driver
They are not "conservative" pundits.
Long ago they have been turned by the dark side......inside the beltway.
The fact that the Tea Party overwhelmingly supports Newt is clear evidence where true conservatives stand.
Newt is not the perfect candodate, but he towers over his tiny colleagues in almost any comparison.
10
posted on
12/09/2011 11:10:22 AM PST
by
PALIN SMITH
(In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.)
To: Sub-Driver
Oh No! Politico!
It can’t be true!
11
posted on
12/09/2011 11:10:48 AM PST
by
mylife
(The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
To: miss marmelstein
12
posted on
12/09/2011 11:10:48 AM PST
by
Salamander
(I'm Wounded, Old And Treacherous.)
To: DebraAI
Yep....pretty obvious attempt at strategy, isn’t it?
13
posted on
12/09/2011 11:11:21 AM PST
by
SumProVita
(Cogito, ergo...Sum Pro Vita. (Modified Decartes))
To: Sub-Driver
Bachmann calls Gingrich a "frugal socialist"!!!
From left to right, Newt Gingrich, John Huntsman and Mitt Rmoney.
14
posted on
12/09/2011 11:11:43 AM PST
by
fishtank
(The denial of original sin is the root of liberalism.)
To: sanjuanbob
15
posted on
12/09/2011 11:12:03 AM PST
by
mylife
(The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
To: BarnacleCenturion
So who do they think can beat The Won?
16
posted on
12/09/2011 11:12:18 AM PST
by
Salamander
(I'm Wounded, Old And Treacherous.)
Newt is also rising, because he’s been a popular guest on tv.
To: BarnacleCenturion
"
This is the main problem with Newt: Rasmussen: Obama 45%, Gingrich 40% "
The main problem with Reagan in late 1979 was this..............
Carter 47 Reagan 39
18
posted on
12/09/2011 11:13:40 AM PST
by
PALIN SMITH
(In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.)
To: Sub-Driver
The article mentions Brooks, Krauthammer, will, Noonan and Gerson. It seems they forgot to Kathleen Parker and fat little Luntz.
19
posted on
12/09/2011 11:13:40 AM PST
by
jakota
(®)
To: Salamander
Comon! His hair is perfect! LoL
20
posted on
12/09/2011 11:14:48 AM PST
by
mylife
(The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-111 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson