Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Conservative pundits turn down Newt
Politico ^

Posted on 12/09/2011 11:04:00 AM PST by Sub-Driver

Conservative pundits turn down Newt By: Alexander Burns December 9, 2011 10:42 AM EST

The conservative opinion elite has reached a consensus on Newt Gingrich: He’s not the one they’ve been waiting for.

In the days since Gingrich leaped to the forefront of the Republican presidential race, the nation’s most prominent right-leaning commentators — many of whom have spent the last year pining for alternatives to Mitt Romney — have rendered a swift and caustic judgment on their party’s latest out-of-right-field challenger.

In columns dripping with disdain, they’ve argued that Gingrich isn’t just undesirable as an opponent for Romney — he’s probably not fit for the presidency altogether.

“He has every negative character trait that conservatives associate with ’60s excess: narcissism, self-righteousness, self-indulgence and intemperance. He just has those traits in Republican form,” New York Times columnist David Brooks wrote Friday. “It doesn’t matter if a person shares your overall philosophy. If that person doesn’t have the right temperament and character, stay away.”

Brooks, an on-and-off Barack Obama admirer and no hardcore ideologue, gave this biting assessment of Gingrich’s policy instincts: “Gingrich loves government more than I do.”

Those are themes that other columnists have developed for more than a week now, recalling Gingrich’s rocky speakership and describing him as an undisciplined, ideologically unreliable egomaniac who likely would lose the general election.

Ramesh Ponnuru, the National Review editor who recently announced his support for Romney, described the consensus on Gingrich as overwhelming.

(Excerpt) Read more at politico.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: gingrich; politico4romney; romney; stenchofromney
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-111 next last

1 posted on 12/09/2011 11:04:06 AM PST by Sub-Driver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Source: Politico

(’nuff said...)


2 posted on 12/09/2011 11:05:39 AM PST by SumProVita (Cogito, ergo...Sum Pro Vita. (Modified Decartes))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

And Newt doesn’t have a nice crease in his pants...


3 posted on 12/09/2011 11:05:49 AM PST by miss marmelstein (Still heartless after all these years...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

David Brooks? Please.


4 posted on 12/09/2011 11:07:06 AM PST by ILS21R (Never give up)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Multiple conservative pundits to Pollutico is David Brooks.

LMBO!


5 posted on 12/09/2011 11:07:14 AM PST by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Don’t really care much for the conservative opinion ELITE
or what they think.


6 posted on 12/09/2011 11:07:14 AM PST by sanjuanbob (Festina Lente)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

We’re so lucky to have these people to tell us what to do.


7 posted on 12/09/2011 11:08:04 AM PST by SaxxonWoods (....The days are long, but the years are short.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
This is the main problem with Newt:

Rasmussen: Obama 45%, Gingrich 40%

8 posted on 12/09/2011 11:09:27 AM PST by BarnacleCenturion (Heartless & Inhumane)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SumProVita

I love it when leftist sites tell us who Conservatives are.


9 posted on 12/09/2011 11:09:32 AM PST by DebraAI
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
They are not "conservative" pundits.

Long ago they have been turned by the dark side......inside the beltway.

The fact that the Tea Party overwhelmingly supports Newt is clear evidence where true conservatives stand.

Newt is not the perfect candodate, but he towers over his tiny colleagues in almost any comparison.

10 posted on 12/09/2011 11:10:22 AM PST by PALIN SMITH (In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Oh No! Politico!

It can’t be true!


11 posted on 12/09/2011 11:10:48 AM PST by mylife (The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: miss marmelstein

Or lacquered hair.


12 posted on 12/09/2011 11:10:48 AM PST by Salamander (I'm Wounded, Old And Treacherous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: DebraAI

Yep....pretty obvious attempt at strategy, isn’t it?


13 posted on 12/09/2011 11:11:21 AM PST by SumProVita (Cogito, ergo...Sum Pro Vita. (Modified Decartes))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Bachmann calls Gingrich a "frugal socialist"!!!

From left to right, Newt Gingrich, John Huntsman and Mitt Rmoney.

14 posted on 12/09/2011 11:11:43 AM PST by fishtank (The denial of original sin is the root of liberalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sanjuanbob

Newt IS THE ELITE


15 posted on 12/09/2011 11:12:03 AM PST by mylife (The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: BarnacleCenturion
So who do they think can beat The Won?
16 posted on 12/09/2011 11:12:18 AM PST by Salamander (I'm Wounded, Old And Treacherous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Newt is also rising, because he’s been a popular guest on tv.


17 posted on 12/09/2011 11:12:59 AM PST by Politics4US
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: BarnacleCenturion
"This is the main problem with Newt: Rasmussen: Obama 45%, Gingrich 40% "

The main problem with Reagan in late 1979 was this..............

Carter 47 Reagan 39

18 posted on 12/09/2011 11:13:40 AM PST by PALIN SMITH (In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

The article mentions Brooks, Krauthammer, will, Noonan and Gerson. It seems they forgot to Kathleen Parker and fat little Luntz.


19 posted on 12/09/2011 11:13:40 AM PST by jakota (®)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salamander

Comon! His hair is perfect! LoL


20 posted on 12/09/2011 11:14:48 AM PST by mylife (The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-111 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson