Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Physicists Discover "Violation of a Fundamental Symmetry of the Universe"
i09.com ^ | November 3, 2010 | Staff

Posted on 11/04/2010 12:31:54 PM PDT by lbryce

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-111 last
To: lbryce
The title is a bit misleading. It has long been hypothesized that an "asymmetry" in the universe is what allows it to exist in anything like the present form. The math apparently requires this, but perhaps the physical explanation/verification has been long in coming.
101 posted on 11/04/2010 8:12:19 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lbryce

You took the words right out of my mouth!!


102 posted on 11/05/2010 5:40:56 AM PDT by ontap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

Every new discovery seems to throw their old theories out the window. lol.

Except evolution. They got that one perfect the first time and there is no possibility of being the slightest bit wrong. Do not touch the holy grail.

But you are right. Other than that, all theories are transient until better data is found.


103 posted on 11/05/2010 5:51:34 AM PDT by Mom MD (Jesus is the Light of the world!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Mom MD

lol.

yes.

Global Warming too, they just need to work out the details of a computer model


104 posted on 11/05/2010 6:20:51 AM PDT by GeronL (http://libertyfic.proboards.com <--- My Fiction/ Science Fiction Board)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: The Comedian
It's the asymmetry that gave rise to matter.

"The Comedian" name suits you well.

FReegards!


105 posted on 11/05/2010 7:42:32 AM PDT by Agamemnon (Darwinism is the glue that holds liberalism together)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: evets

You are referring to the First Law of thermodynamics, but it says the total of mass AND ENERGY in a closed system remains constant.

But according to Einstein’s Theory of General Relativity (and our best science today), mass is merely one property time/space/energy/matter. All are interchangeable.


106 posted on 11/05/2010 10:09:16 AM PDT by Captain Steve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

These “little neutral ones” seem to be multiplying. What else can they not detect?


107 posted on 11/05/2010 1:14:21 PM PDT by allmost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: evets

Two days later this still makes me laugh. Thanks!


108 posted on 11/05/2010 3:25:53 PM PDT by Aevery_Freeman (Fear God and Government - especially when one tries to become the other!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: allmost

Seems like a neutrino detector would be a surefire way to win a high school science fair — under these standards. ;’)


109 posted on 11/05/2010 4:53:37 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (The 2nd Amendment follows right behind the 1st because some people are hard of hearing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: Aevery_Freeman
Lol. It was an 'enlightening' experience. Thank you!
110 posted on 11/08/2010 10:38:51 AM PST by evets (beer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: Aevery_Freeman

sorry for the bad joke

this uneducated mind, who’s physics intel is limited to info learned some 40 years ago prior to ‘quarks’, is trying to understand, so, I went to the io9 article ‘The Undiscovered Particles on the Edge of Known Physics’, where I read, “sterile neutrinos... are nearly identical to neutrinos except they only interact through gravity”

in io9’s ‘The Ultimate Field Guide to Subatomic Particles” neutrinos are described as decayed neutrons, or “electron anti-neutrino”

So, are the physicists saying that it is interaction with the gravity of the SN that causes nutrinos to change to the (heavier) muons and taus, and loss of interaction that causes a reversal back to a (lighter) nutrino at a rate faster than expected? or is it the interaction with an ‘anti’ substance that changes a muon back to a nutrino? and, finally, how can an ‘anti’ be ‘serile’(neutral) ?


111 posted on 11/08/2010 11:14:56 AM PST by blueplum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-111 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson