Posted on 07/11/2010 10:21:20 AM PDT by PROCON
In tracking the response to the launch of the site and petition to draft Sarah Palin for the Chairmanship of the RNC, we have seen varied reactions ranging from enthusiasm, to curiosity, to skepticism, to racist bigotry, to deafening silence.
One common denominator in near uniformity, however, is the consensus that Michael Steele is, at best, ineffective as Chair of the RNC for one or more of the following reasons.
(Excerpt) Read more at biggovernment.com ...
Yeah, I changed my mind on Steele. I say give him a chance.
Many people are a little too anxious to see him go for
what I consider a ‘gaffe’
She's a much better pick for President in 2012 .
I'm with ya, just posted this for other FR opinions, (and boy did I get it)!..:=)
Nah, I’d rather have Romney as RNC Chairperson.
Agreed! He made a valid point and the media jumped on it. Then the other Republicans, even Newt, jumped on him for saying we could not win that war in Afghanistan. However, he was speaking at a Republican fund raiser, part of his job, and was telling the Republicans that since it is not winnable in the traditional sense why not let Obama have it! That would prevent the Democrats from continually hanging the war around Bush's neck every time something went bad, as it always will.
The idea of Palin in that spot is ludicrous. Palin doesn't need to be pigeonholed. She needs to be free to do her thing, whatever that may be, in her own time frame.
Why you telling me. Did you hit the wrong 'reply' button?
I really like Sarah but she has no business taking the RNC chair, it is a dead end job for her and one the insiders want her to take to get her out of the Presidential race(2012).
Not too bad! Had enough of the 96 degree stuff, though.
You?
Maybe she doesn’t want the job.
NOPE. Putting her in the chair of the RNC is a way for establishment GOP’s to fence her in and silence her. You can tell she’s having a REAL effect on American politics. Look how many people and organizations want to clip her wings.
Great....working on new messaging/communication biz with partners and have an appt with a campaign manager tomorrow....glad it’s been under 90 ....96 IS A BIT MUCH!
That stated, I don't want to see Sarah Palin as RNC chairman. Previous posters have explained why. Suffice it to say that I agree with them. I doubt she'd be interested, anyway.
Sarah Palin is in a unique position, now. Her mere presence on the national scene drives liberals into extreme rages and helps show their hatefulness and contempt for middle America, which Palin - like it or not - represents. She has great fund raising abilities and keeps Obama's 'feet to the fire'. She doesn't need the RNC chairmanship.
yes. sorry
President or nothing!
I bet she doesn’t.
I can’t think of a worse idea than to try to drag our next president down to this absurd level.
Give Huck the job; he’s a true huckster!
.
.
Foolishness!
.
“Steele does not deserve to get fired for the most sensible thing he, or any other RNC chair, has said.”
.
Lots of truth in that.
.
For your review ping!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.