Posted on 05/13/2010 9:24:19 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
Muslims are a prophecy-mad people. They will, no doubt, take the mosque for the symbolism.
The fall of Constantinople, some centuries ago, became the same sort of “realisation of prophecy” according to their Quran.
Never let the idiots win the ideological war. Allowing so will be surrender whose repercussions will go beyond a just a mere building.
Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf -— See more about Rauf, his wife Daisy Khan, the Cordoba Initiative, and American Society for Muslim Advancement at the link below:
Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf, Chairman of Cordoba Initiative, was invited to speak in Sydney, Australia, by Premier Bob Carr in 2004.
According to the Sydney Morning Herald, he said the U.S. and the West must acknowledge the harm they’ve done to Muslims before terrorism can end.
He said the West must understand the terrorists’ point of view – and he blamed Christians for starting mass attacks on civilians.
“The Islamic method of waging war is not to kill innocent civilians. But it was Christians in World War II who bombed civilians in Dresden and Hiroshima, neither of which were military targets,” he said.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2505266/posts?page=317#317
DISGRACE!!!!
MANY CONTEND OBAMA IS A MUSLIM OPERATIVE BENT ON DESTROYING AMERICA FROM WITHIN.
>>>Ground Zero Mosque SHOULD BE SHUT DOWN BY OBAMA ADMIN, IT WON’T, ENOUGH SAID.
This is definately a slap in the face to Americans from that Muslim in the WH.
What Constitutional authority does the President have to "shut down" a house of worship?
But the mozlims have unlimited fund$. What happens when your enemy has all the money?
If it takes an amendment to the constitution to accomplish it, I am almost certain that Americans would vote for it. Or just one law for New York, that no moslem ever be allowed to build a mosque where so many innocents from every nation were killed on a beautiful September morning.
Do I think that President Obama would ever champion something so patriotic? Of course not! I don’t believe the man even knows the words to the Pledge of Allegiance.
But a constitutional amendment to keep a mosque off the property? I believe real AMERICANS would vote for it.
“MANY CONTEND OBAMA IS A MUSLIM OPERATIVE BENT ON DESTROYING AMERICA FROM WITHIN.”
“DESTROYING AMERICA FROM WITHIN” -— that is his goal
“MANY CONTEND OBAMA IS A MUSLIM OPERATIVE” -— at the very least, he sees himself as their protector and will only act against Muslim jihadists in America (and their enablers) when his political back is against the wall and he has no other choice.
I can say for certain, based on a lengthy interview he did some time ago, that he is not a Christian (no matter what he publicly professes). The interview reveals he lacks basic understanding.
It’s also possible that he sees himself as part of the new world religion crowd -— all religions are the same; they all lead to God, etc -— the Oprah religion. This group is myopic about the nature of Islam because they believe what the “moderate” Muslims tell them.
“Ground Zero Mosque SHOULD BE SHUT DOWN”
I think only overwhelming public sentiment (especially and most importantly in NYC) has the power to do so.
“the Cordoba Initiative”
Should they be crushed live velour, or have their hides tanned till they resemble rich Corinthian leather?
From the beginning the Islamic jihads have transformed the churches, administrative centers, and the properties of others into memorials to their victories. From the Temple Mount in Jerusalem, the castles of Cordoba,Spain, the Hagia Sophia Church in Constantinople, and now the World Trade Center Murder site, these animals urinate on their territory and in full public view mark it as their captured bloody prize.
We in New York have been an enabler in this process whether we want to admit it or not. We have allowed our NEOCOM/Socialist city and state leaders to bow to every communist and Muslim fringe group with a whining sophist argument to leave that ugly ripped pit in the earth as a testament to our weakness and inability to recover. These animals now view it(Ground Zero) as deserted ground worthy of squatting rights!
Makes your stomach sour; doesn’t it? Of course, it could be that they are being funneled the American people’s money too.
THE JAWA REPORT - blog: "9/11 FIREFIGHTER OPPOSES MOSQUE AT GROUND ZERO AS 'A TROJAN HORSE ROLLED ONTO OUR MOST SACRED GROUND," asks 'Where is the money coming from?"" (SNIPPET: "A decision by a Lower Manhattan community board this week gives the go-ahead for a $100 million mosque to locate beside the Ground Zero site. But not everyone is happy with the decision, including those who survived the attacks and the families of those murdered by Islamic terrorists on 9/11. In this Fox NY interview below on Thursday, 9/11 firefighter Tim Brown describes the mosque project as "a Trojan horse being rolled into our most sacred ground". He squared off with the mosque's imam, Feisal Abdul Rauf, asking whether any of the money for this mosque will be coming from the regimes of Islamic countries who have actively aided and financed Islamic terrorists, and where Rauf got the reported $4.85 million in cash to purchase the building, prompting profuse evasion and side-stepping by the imam. Tim Brown is one of the few 9/11 survivors to survive the collapse of both WTC towers. He also a first responder to the 1993 WTC bombing by another group of Islamic terrorists. Here is his story on what happened on 9/11:" (Posted May 8, 2010)
Islam is not a religion. It is a violent political ideology with its own set of laws and court system. Religion is only one component and is used to impose Islam on non muslim societies.
Have NYC Athiests chimed in on this? They were apoplectic over the cross beam that was on the WTC site simply because some Christians viewed it as a religious symbol when it reality it was part of the orginal structure. It was subsequently moved to in front of St. Peter’s Church on Barclay Street. I guess NYC Athiests are only politically correct when it comes to Islam.
Why would atheists care about this? This is on private property, and is not on the WTC site. Atheists don’t go around protesting every church/synagogue/mosque/temple/etc.
Wasn’t the WTC privately owned on 9/11?
Of course the WTC was privately owned. The atheists who complained about the cross did not complain because it was there, they complained because it was (and, I think, still is?) going to be part of the (taxpayer-funded) 9/11 memorial.
I’m not justifying the atheists’ complaints (they’re idiots - that cross is as much a symbol of the aftermath of 9/11 as anything else I can think of, of course it should be part of hte memorial). I’m just saying that the cross protest is not at all analagous to this one.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.