Just how stupid do these people think we are? Try tracking down the Obama’s law licenses and see

The Collins Report ^ | May 8, 2010 | Suzanne Eovaldi, staff writer

[jmaroneps37]

Running down definitive evidence on the real story of law licenses for the Obamas is an exercise in futility and an example of the usefulness of Wite-Out.

According to the current information page for the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission (ARDC), Michelle Obama was admitted to practice law in Illinois on December 30, 1899. This is NOT a misprint, that’s what it really says.

Perhaps our First Lady had to be reincarnated to take her pricey job in a Chicago health care system. Curiously that position has not been filled since her departure.

Michelle Obama’s “Lawyer Search” form reveals no full licensed name, no full former name, no registered business address, no registered business phone, or no Illinois registration status, only the curiously comical date “December 30 1899.”

“Page has been removed”

The “page has been removed” warning comes up for several sites and searches for the law license of Barack Hussein Obama, but a very interesting video called Dossier 2MP4 is still available.

The video calls Obama “Renegade” and asks lots of pointed questions. Check it out before to too is taken down.

It shows Obama did not give his second name of Barry Soetoro in the ARDC box for “Full Former name(s).” The accompanying dialogue suggests this failure to list a second name could well be the reason he relinquished his law license in 1993.

The Snopes fact check site likes to discount any out of the ordinary curiosities here, only saying Obama “retired” and Michelle’s turning in her law license was “okay” too. What is hard to fathom is why Obama, the President of the Harvard Law Review, just gave up his law license at age 47, at the cusp of his really big time earning power.

Just how stupid do these people think we are?

[Beckwith]

They are communists trying to take over young minds

Yes, they are.