Just how stupid do these people think we are? Try tracking down the Obama’s law licenses and see

The Collins Report ^ | May 8, 2010 | Suzanne Eovaldi, staff writer

[Morgan in Denver]

These are great. Thanks for the link.

[hedgetrimmer]

They don’t think we’re stupid, they rely on the fact that we are powerless to stop them.

[FreeAtlanta]

I don't know about mirrors, but he is always in front of teleprompters.

[TheCipher]

I hear that Bow-wow Woodward is working a Obama. I also recall that he has a deep throat.

LOL. I am sure he put it to good use when getting "inside info" for the book :-)

[freekitty]

The Obamas have way too many secrets.

[Texas Fossil]

Where is Kitty Kelley when you need her?!

On the wrong side.

[MarkeyD]

December 30, 1899 is what a computer recognizes as when time starts.

[Oatka]

Of course the 1899 part is a typo

Or it could be a default date - as no date was entered. (Similar to Post 7) I've worked on systems where a blank date defaulted to that turn-of-the-century date, although it was usually the 31st of December.

[Faith]

Ping for you and others. Thanks.

[sport]

We elected them and put them in power. What else should they think? In fact, on that one, I agree with them.

[null and void]

ping...

[Tammy8]

I believe New Mexico has a bar that issues a license to practice law- one of the requirements to practice law in this state. The state does issue a permit also but attorneys must have both. I think most states have a bar, is that what you mean- the bar gives licenses and the state gives permits? Or am I confused?

[bgill]

Firefox

[mendedheart]

You are so right- Snopes is a group of big time LIBERALS.

[bgill]

Back before most people learned to print screen (someone might have it), I remember both of their pages had real (or logical) dates. It also showed when each dropped their “licenses” and that MO’s was court ordered. Some have claimed the court ordered term means that she’s voluntarily gave it up but at one time there were articles about her getting into trouble with some money laundering or real estate scam or something and that was why she was asked to give it up or volunteered to give it up before it hit the fan.

[stephenjohnbanker]

I read on FR about a month ago that Michelle “surrendered” he lic. 2 weeks prior to a formal hearing(which could have revoked her lic.)

[Salvation]

Interesting fact to ponder.

[stephenjohnbanker]

I wish I had kept a link to it, sorry about that ;-)

[GatorGirl]

Lawyers who remain in good standing rarely “give up” their license. The requirements for procuring it are too stringent. It’s better to go on inactive status or just keep renewing it, it’s easy to attend a couple of seminars per year to keep up your CLE credits and they could certainly afford to pay the yearly fee and seminar costs.

Something is definitely fishy about this so-called “retirement”.

[GatorGirl]

Your “admission to the Bar” is in the common vernacular, a “license” to practice.

True it is not an administrative license, but it’s merely semantics and I hardly think a cog in the wheel of the great progressivist conspiracy to say “law license”.