Posted on 05/08/2010 7:07:50 AM PDT by jmaroneps37
Running down definitive evidence on the real story of law licenses for the Obamas is an exercise in futility and an example of the usefulness of Wite-Out.
According to the current information page for the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission (ARDC), Michelle Obama was admitted to practice law in Illinois on December 30, 1899. This is NOT a misprint, that’s what it really says.
Perhaps our First Lady had to be reincarnated to take her pricey job in a Chicago health care system. Curiously that position has not been filled since her departure.
Michelle Obama’s “Lawyer Search” form reveals no full licensed name, no full former name, no registered business address, no registered business phone, or no Illinois registration status, only the curiously comical date “December 30 1899.”
“Page has been removed”
The “page has been removed” warning comes up for several sites and searches for the law license of Barack Hussein Obama, but a very interesting video called Dossier 2MP4 is still available.
The video calls Obama “Renegade” and asks lots of pointed questions. Check it out before to too is taken down.
It shows Obama did not give his second name of Barry Soetoro in the ARDC box for “Full Former name(s).” The accompanying dialogue suggests this failure to list a second name could well be the reason he relinquished his law license in 1993.
The Snopes fact check site likes to discount any out of the ordinary curiosities here, only saying Obama “retired” and Michelle’s turning in her law license was “okay” too. What is hard to fathom is why Obama, the President of the Harvard Law Review, just gave up his law license at age 47, at the cusp of his really big time earning power.
Just how stupid do these people think we are?
(Excerpt) Read more at collinsreport.net ...
Did you mean to say "onerous" or "nervous".
Personally, either one would work.
Vampires! Have you seen them near any mirrors?
It would be interesting to see if there was a lawyer by the name of Michelle Obama in 1899. Could it be the current one used the others data?
Linky no worky....conspiracy theory?
Link to the Collins Report doesn’t work.
The inventory control system at my company defaults to 1899 when it hits too many bogus entries.
If he gave up his license in 1993 then he was 32 or 33 years old at the time, not 47. I wish I could have retired at 33.
The accompanying dialogue suggests this failure to list a second name could well be the reason he relinquished his law license in 1993.
What is hard to fathom is why Obama, the President of the Harvard Law Review, just gave up his law license at age 47
Well, was he 47 in 1993? Or is "relinquished" different than "just gave up"? I'm close to saying that "these people" measured this author pretty well.
“Curiously that position has not been filled since her departure.”
I believe no one yet has qualified. From what I can infer, you have to: a) be the spouse of an Illinois state senator; b) said senator must be willing to engage in corrupt practices; c) being black is a very useful, though not necessary, qualification, etc.
We have also heard that Zero had a multitude of Social Security numbers. Has anyone researched this?
“Snopes fact check site”
I choked on my coffee at that oxymoron. Snopes is run by democrat pary activists who CONSTANTLY distort, cover-up, and lie.
More unbelievable coverup for the biggest swindle in US history...none of this swindling would be possible without the media handmaiden, running out front, at the flank, on the rear, in exhaustive, preemptive and catch-up damage control and smokecloud creation.
The criminal media are all accessories to this.
Obama was the sweet spot moment the progressves have waited for to destroy this republic. He HAD to be black. That is their ACE, their screen of invincibility.
They already planned a “how dare you question the black man??!!” strategy and already planned to hammer away at any criticism or quest to look into his background as racist.
They knew with the bootlick fools in the media, they could cut the legs out of a sizable of critics with this inflammatory accusation—the substance, the questions would be pushed underground and buried in the rigtheous indignation of the ‘morally outraged’ left.
They knew how this would play.
The only toughie is the fact, although he gives good teleprompter, Obama is so layered up in scandal and checkered issues of legitmacy and hidden creds.
His operatives must be stressed and stretched as tight as a drum trying to stay up on this tangled web of deception 24/7.
In 1993...at age 47?
We are being lied too every day and the lies just don’t hold water.
Where is Kitty Kelley when you need her?!
I can’t get on the site. Server overload?
BTT
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.