Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Deport Children of Illegals: Hunter
NBC ^ | 4/28/10 | staff

Posted on 04/28/2010 9:25:10 AM PDT by pissant

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-135 next last
To: AuntB

BUMP


61 posted on 04/28/2010 11:38:36 AM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Old Grumpy; pissant; All

““he does not believe children born to illegal immigrant parents should get automatic U.S. citizenship.”

I totally agree.”

And another thing...someone needs to address the nonsense of ‘dual citizenship’ with countries like Mexico. They vote here as US citizens, then vote here in polling places in Mexican elections that we set up for them. That is BS.

What happened to the pledge of relinquishing all other allegiances? Yeah, I know, some silly liberal judge.


62 posted on 04/28/2010 11:41:34 AM PDT by AuntB (Illegal immigration is simply more ‘share the wealth’ socialism and a CRIME not a race!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor


They don’t get citizenship.

That is a lie perpetuated by the globalist media.

Their parents must be here legally, and fully under the laws of the US for the children to have the option of citizenship.

That is what the court said, and it is what the 14th ammendment says.

The media don’t have the power to set precedent.

There are no “anchor babies.””

If you mean that the Constitution & the 14th amendment do NOT give citizenship to illegal alien offspring born here, you are correct.

HOWEVER, for many years, that isn’t what’s happening. They are considered US citizens, and many of them are now old enough to vote. Because they are considered citizens they can get the entire family on public aid, etc.

As for there are no ‘anchor babies, perhaps you’d prefer the term coined by Terry Anderson...JACKPOT babies.


63 posted on 04/28/2010 11:48:17 AM PDT by AuntB (Illegal immigration is simply more ‘share the wealth’ socialism and a CRIME not a race!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Windflier
You're saying that there's no such thing as an "anchor baby"?

Yes, that is exactly what I'm saying. Its just another leftist media lie.

64 posted on 04/28/2010 11:57:18 AM PDT by editor-surveyor (Obamacare is America's kristallnacht !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Vermont Lt

“Unfortunately, that is part of the Constitution”

.
No, that is not a part of the constitution.

The fact that you “have no problem” with that destructive lie says much about you.
.


65 posted on 04/28/2010 12:00:09 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Obamacare is America's kristallnacht !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: 2dogjoe; pissant

“I don’t want to believe that you, as a fellow Freeper, are a rascist.”

Oh, please, he’s being a lot more civil than these invaders are to the rest of us. The most racism I’ve ever seen is by the new socialist, ignorant migrant Mexicans against Black Americans, well ALL Americans, for that matter...they’re taught to hate us. There’s plenty of info out there, if you want it.

[snip] video clip today that shows an illegal alien supporter in Arizona claiming that shovels and axes will be used against Americans just prior to the riot, where police officers and American citizens were assaulted by the mob protesting SB 1070.

VIDEO CLIP THREATENING ARMED REBELLION
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mDlutO0KK7g

“We will not stop! We will take up our shovels and pickaxes and we...we will use them against you! Believe that!” screams an opponent of Arizona’s tough new bill addressing illegal immigration.

Several organizers supporting the opponents of the bill can be seen trying to stop illegal alien supporters from accosting American citizens who support SB 1070.

Despite intense efforts by illegal alien organizers and police to keep the angry crowd back, a large Hispanic male in a red sport jersey that reads “Warner 13” tries to push past handlers and another voice screams (garbled) “you can’t argue with a puto!”

The Urban Dictionary defines a puto as a “Spanish word for a male prostitute. sometimes it’s offensive for homosexuals. In Mexico it is used for cowards and traitors.”


66 posted on 04/28/2010 12:05:48 PM PDT by AuntB (Illegal immigration is simply more ‘share the wealth’ socialism and a CRIME not a race!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: 2dogjoe

What race are Mexicans?


67 posted on 04/28/2010 12:09:11 PM PDT by alarm rider (The left will always tell you who they fear the most. What are they telling you now?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: AuntB

I get so damn sick of these ball-less wonders on ‘our side’ who somehow think they need to go above and beyond all resaon, to ridiculous heights of political correctness so that the vile filthy marxists in the media won’t call them racists. I say F*** ‘em all.

I don’t tolerate the race card hustlers or their apologists, no matter if its donkeys or elephants.


68 posted on 04/28/2010 12:10:24 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor

Did you read my next post where I admitted that I was wrong?

I am constantly amazed that people on the internet will jump ugly on someone without even reading their threads.

That, my friend, says a lot about you.

The fact that you judge people without more than a tidbit of information makes you a feminine hygiene product.


69 posted on 04/28/2010 12:11:38 PM PDT by Vermont Lt (This nation, of the people, by the people, and for the people has perished from the land.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: pissant
Yep!

The oath of the Squatter Support Squad

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

70 posted on 04/28/2010 12:17:06 PM PDT by AuntB (Illegal immigration is simply more ‘share the wealth’ socialism and a CRIME not a race!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: kabar

Children of illegal alien parents in the U.S. should not be given automatic U.S. Citizenship. This 14th amendment was interpreted incorrectly. Our congress chose to ignore the real meaning of this law, and did absolutely NOTHING about the hordes coming over to have their babies and be on the gravy train because of the kids.
This way our congress and presidents are allowing these illegals to eventually take over our entire country.
These anchor babies and their parents are already voting and hoping for Reconquista!. This is their goal.
Our government is too stupid to see this coming.

Try this in Mexico and see how far you get.


71 posted on 04/28/2010 12:40:22 PM PDT by Jennikins (It matters not what we want, as we are being ruled, not governed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Bookmark


72 posted on 04/28/2010 12:40:46 PM PDT by dragnet2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: pissant
That's not what they are...

They are traitors to America. The sad truth is, we are surrounded by traitors here. Much like what happened during the first revolution.

73 posted on 04/28/2010 12:45:07 PM PDT by dragnet2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Jennikins
We have 400,000 anchor babies a year. The reality is that they are being given birthright citizenship under jus solis. We need change our laws or amend the Constitution, whatever it takes to get rid of it.
74 posted on 04/28/2010 12:49:15 PM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor

What case are you referring to?


75 posted on 04/28/2010 12:49:38 PM PDT by Mr. Blonde (You ever thought about being weird for a living?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Windflier

It would take reversal of judicial precedent to prevent birthright citizenship for the children of illegals. Remember that we come from a common law tradition, where judicial review/precedent carries alot of weight.


76 posted on 04/28/2010 12:51:03 PM PDT by Clemenza (Remember our Korean War Veterans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: pissant
Real straight talk -- not a PC bone in Hunter's body. And as usual he's right -- the anchor baby laws have caused both financial and social chaos.
77 posted on 04/28/2010 1:55:25 PM PDT by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant; ExTexasRedhead
Liberal on the site are going ballistic with comments saying that Congressman Hunter want to trash the Constitution.

MEMO to mentally deranged liberals: Mexicans here illegally HAVE NO Constitutional rights!

These people are NOT citizens of the United States.

Just because she whelps on this side of the border does not change the fact that these are MEXICAN citizens with their own government and laws.

Quit breaking ours.

78 posted on 04/28/2010 2:07:03 PM PDT by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Adder; pissant
How are they not? Where is the fallacy? I’d love for that to be the case....

I have been searching for a cogent way to explain it. I found it in another forum posted by someone else:

"You should know by now that the 14th Amendment contains the phrase "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof".

An "AND" clause requires both sides of the clause to be true for the conclusion to therefore be true. Children of illegal immigrants are subjects of the jurisdiction of a foreign power, not of the United States, and therefore, they are not citizens of the United States, they are citizens of their parents' nations.

There is absolutely no historical precedent for citizenship being granted merely on the basis of having been born on U.S. territory. Thanks to this deliberately broad interpretation, we now have nonsense like a global birth-tourism industry where people from all over the world come to have their kids here to claim all the benefits of U.S. citizenship. Never in the wildest dreams of the authors of the 14th Amendment did they imagine that those words could be seriously interpreted as loosely as you suggest."

79 posted on 04/28/2010 2:51:35 PM PDT by raybbr (Someone who invades another country is NOT an immigrant - illegal or otherwise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: kabar

See Elian Gonzales.


80 posted on 04/28/2010 2:59:09 PM PDT by Clovis_Skeptic (The answer to 1984 is 1776!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-135 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson