Skip to comments.
Obama slays Repubs in Fox News poll
Wash Examiner ^
| 1/21/10
| Julie Mason
Posted on 01/21/2010 10:07:18 PM PST by pissant
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101 next last
Good. Maybe they won't run.
Hunter/Demint 2012
1
posted on
01/21/2010 10:07:19 PM PST
by
pissant
To: pissant
2
posted on
01/21/2010 10:09:42 PM PST
by
Gene Eric
(Your Hope has been redistributed. Here's your Change.)
To: pissant
Just wait until the January unemployment numbers come in.
3
posted on
01/21/2010 10:09:52 PM PST
by
norge
(The amiable dunce is back, wearing a skirt and high heels.)
To: pissant
“Generic Republican Candidate” has no baggage while anyone you name, Republican or Democrat does have lots of baggage.
4
posted on
01/21/2010 10:09:56 PM PST
by
trumandogz
(The Democrats are driving us to Socialism at 100 MPH -The GOP is driving us to Socialism at 97.5 MPH)
To: trumandogz
Another couple years of this crap and nobody will have the baggage that Obama has. Jack the Ripper would beat him.
5
posted on
01/21/2010 10:11:50 PM PST
by
Jim from C-Town
(The government is rarely benevolent, often malevolent and never benign!)
To: pissant
I don’t believe DeMint or Hunter has a chance.
Palin’s campaigning for McCain is deeply disappointing to me, however: his re-election could bring in amnesty before 2012, which could in turn get Obama re-elected.
I wonder, who is our most conservative sitting governor?
To: Jim from C-Town
keep it coming progressives.. we know we can defeat you we know how to and we will. just please keep acting like you are...
Move on org is our best asset...
7
posted on
01/21/2010 10:12:57 PM PST
by
gibtx2
(keep up the good work I am out of work but post 20 a month to this out of WF Check)
To: Gene Eric
I can live with that, if I have to.
8
posted on
01/21/2010 10:13:10 PM PST
by
pissant
(THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
To: pissant
Surpised they didn’t an Obama v Brown poll.
Just think, if Mitt moves to California, we could have Romney/Brown in 2012.
9
posted on
01/21/2010 10:14:05 PM PST
by
Reagan Man
("In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem.")
To: Gene Eric; pissant
To: Jim from C-Town
One would hope so, but the only Republican that would have a chance against Obama would be Sarah Palin.
11
posted on
01/21/2010 10:15:46 PM PST
by
trumandogz
(The Democrats are driving us to Socialism at 100 MPH -The GOP is driving us to Socialism at 97.5 MPH)
To: All
I'm thinking Hillary challenges Obama for the Democratic nomination in 2012 and he goes down in flames.
12
posted on
01/21/2010 10:15:52 PM PST
by
Doofer
To: pissant
Saints be blessed, Huckabee NOT included.
13
posted on
01/21/2010 10:16:04 PM PST
by
onyx
To: pissant
Here is the key fact about this poll:
“The national telephone poll was conducted for Fox News by Opinion Dynamics Corp. among 900 registered voters from Jan. 12 to Jan. 13. For the total sample, the poll has a margin of error of plus or minus 3 percentage points.”
from the Fox article.
Registered voters are not likely voters. So the poll is meaningless, since we rarely get more than 65% of the registered voters to vote in a Presidential election. And, more Republicans vote than Democrats.
14
posted on
01/21/2010 10:16:29 PM PST
by
Forgiven_Sinner
(If you meet people with no brain, no heart and no courage, you are not in KS-You are in the Congress)
To: pissant
Where were they polling, Berkeley?
15
posted on
01/21/2010 10:16:38 PM PST
by
lewislynn
(What does the global warming movement and the Fairtax movement have in common? Disinformation)
To: Reagan Man
Just think, if Mitt moves to California, we could have Romney/Brown in 2012.LOL!!
Romney, of course, is a non-starter but Brown may have a future down the road.
He needs to build a record first.
To: Reagan Man
17
posted on
01/21/2010 10:16:43 PM PST
by
pissant
(THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
To: pissant
Seems about right. For some reason, the sheeple still seem to like this guy. Interesting that of the real choices, Palin gets clobbered by the widest margin, while Romney, while still beaten soundly, is the closest. What does that tell us about the relative appeal of these choices on a national level?
18
posted on
01/21/2010 10:16:57 PM PST
by
chimera
To: pissant
Palin hasnt begun to run on Obamas old hope and change..
But America WANTS hope and change a real one..
Obama was and is a shill for the elite..
Palin has proved she has the will and can change bringing hope..
All that remains is for her to co-opt Obamas lieing gambit..
She can propose actual IDEAS for hope and change not merely rhetoric..
Wonder if shes THAT SMART TO SEE THIS..
NOT more gov't BUT LESS OF IT.. <<- HOPE and CHANGE..
19
posted on
01/21/2010 10:17:11 PM PST
by
hosepipe
(This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole....)
To: pissant
20
posted on
01/21/2010 10:17:21 PM PST
by
icwhatudo
("laws requiring compulsory abortion could be sustained under the existing Constitution"Obama Adviser)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson