Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: pissant
Seems about right. For some reason, the sheeple still seem to like this guy. Interesting that of the real choices, Palin gets clobbered by the widest margin, while Romney, while still beaten soundly, is the closest. What does that tell us about the relative appeal of these choices on a national level?
18 posted on 01/21/2010 10:16:57 PM PST by chimera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: chimera

That Sarah is a woman and he is a male?

I’ve been dismissive of the theory up to now but given how some Freepers have reacted to Brown; making statements he should run for President I have to wonder.

He has less experience by far then she does. His positions are even less defined then her own except it would seem he’s probably more liberal then she. He’s certainly less experienced or known quantity then Barack Obama whom Freepers have excoriated. Yet people seriously float his name. Why? He’s charismatic but so is Sarah. He’s attractive but so is she. Which leads me to believe one of two things. It’s either because he’s male or it’s the accent.

A number of conservatives hated the way Bush spoke. Halting with a twang. Sarah has her own colorful speech.

Mitt and Brown are male and that that “impediment” to their speech is absent. If people really are that shallow and given the way people have fawned over Obama’s speech I am thinking they may be, God help us.

However, I’m not letting polls dictate my choice at this stage. Liberals are not an option for me. And I’m not a certain vote for anyone. Not even Sarah. I don’’t trust any politician and I’ll continue to observing all of them.


34 posted on 01/21/2010 10:34:52 PM PST by Soul Seeker (?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson