Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pakistani army: No new offensive for 6-12 months
AP via Yahoo News ^ | 01/21/2010 | AP

Posted on 01/21/2010 2:33:11 AM PST by ErnstStavroBlofeld

The Pakistani army says it can't launch any new offensives against militants for six months to a year to give it time to stabilize existing gains.

Army spokesman Gen. Athar Abbas revealed the news to reporters traveling with visiting U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates on Thursday.

The U.S. has pressed Pakistan to target militants using its territory to launch cross-border attacks against coalition troops in Afghanistan.

But Abbas' comments make clear that Pakistan will remain focused in the short-term on operations targeting militants waging war against the state.

The Pakistani army launched a major ground offensive against the Pakistani Taliban's main stronghold in the South Waziristan tribal area in mid-October.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: pakistan; pakistaniarmy; taliban

1 posted on 01/21/2010 2:33:12 AM PST by ErnstStavroBlofeld
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove

Fine mine the passes and put listening devices on the sides of them.


2 posted on 01/21/2010 3:28:53 AM PST by doodad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove; G8 Diplomat; Marine_Uncle; NormsRevenge; Dog; SunkenCiv; Fred Nerks; Oynx; ...
From Roggio:

No new offensives against the Taliban this year: Pakistani Army

Wars are just too HARD I guess.

3 posted on 01/22/2010 11:08:15 AM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach ( Support Geert Wilders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Well. At least the verdict is in. Pakistan has little interest in helping bring down their networks of terrorist. They are only interested in taking out those that would do immediate harm to parts of their country. But of course we shall continue sinking money into their coffers pretending they are our allies in this fight.


4 posted on 01/22/2010 4:21:34 PM PST by Marine_Uncle (Honor must be earned....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach; AdmSmith; Berosus; bigheadfred; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Fred Nerks; ...

Too many of their “troops” have been taken out by US drones. ;’) Thanks Ernest.


5 posted on 01/22/2010 6:30:18 PM PST by SunkenCiv (Happy New Year! Freedom is Priceless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Can’t say I’m surprised. Pakistan’s committment to cleaning out their country is superficial at best.


6 posted on 01/22/2010 7:33:34 PM PST by G8 Diplomat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove; Ernest_at_the_Beach; G8 Diplomat; Marine_Uncle; NormsRevenge; Dog; SunkenCiv; ...
The PA has done a lot of hard fighting, 2 of their three N W divisions were committed to S Waziristan, suffered over 2,500 killed and wounded and are in winter garrison licking their wounds. The remaining division is in even tougher winter quarters in Swat.

They will be combat effective in a few months but are heavily tied down to holding down the territory they have taken.

The PA has several remaining divisions that are very tied up watching Balochistan, protecting Gwadar and the Sindh.

N Waziristan has always been the elephant in the living room that everyone pretends isn't there and just steps around. The PA/ISI has an incestuous relationship with the Haqqanis and Wazirs and are not ready or willing to take them on.

We cannot stabilize Afghanistan or stop AQ without destroying the Haqqani network and the Paki's can't/won't help us. We are at impasse and can only use UAV's for now.

BTW, the loss of our CIA personnel had an unintended benefit: the enemy knows who they are and, concerned about our retaliation, many of them ducked or went into hiding, that was noticed. That made it easier to sort out the goats from the sheep.

7 posted on 01/23/2010 10:42:34 PM PST by gandalftb (OK State: Go Cowboys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gandalftb

Thanks gtb.


8 posted on 01/24/2010 7:51:00 AM PST by SunkenCiv (Happy New Year! Freedom is Priceless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: gandalftb
"We cannot stabilize Afghanistan or stop AQ without destroying the Haqqani network and the Paki's can't/won't help us. We are at impasse and can only use UAV's for now."
All you wrote I would give the thumbs up to. You state facts. My terse comment was basically grounded in the above statement you made which again I agree is factual.
I was aware of the limited forces they have at their disposal to ingress into the FATHA. And obviously with winter conditions setting in for the next few months they are further hampered. We shall see when spring sets in and warms the air what path they shall be willing to take.
9 posted on 01/24/2010 7:52:57 PM PST by Marine_Uncle (Honor must be earned....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson