60 Minutes running hit piece interview now.
1 posted on
01/10/2010 5:35:37 PM PST by
writer33
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-78 next last
To: writer33
OUR COUNTRY IS FALLING APART....illegal backroom deals, bombers getting on planes, criminals in the White House and what does 60 MINUTES CHOOSE to report on...Unfreakingbelievable. But who cares..nobody watches.
2 posted on
01/10/2010 5:37:47 PM PST by
Hildy
(This Christmas, the Democrats have given America the one gift that keeps on taking.)
To: writer33
Steve is a piece of schmidt.
3 posted on
01/10/2010 5:38:08 PM PST by
facedown
(Armed in the Heartland)
To: writer33
This guy has had a major hard on for her since the campaign.
Consider the source.
To: writer33
I dare another Rino to pick this lying, liberal atheist, Schmidt, to run his/her campaign. I'll work for the Democrat.
5 posted on
01/10/2010 5:38:58 PM PST by
ryan71
(TERM LIMITS)
To: writer33
"...her untruths have done long-term damage to her public image." No kidding? Who'd a thunk it? When are we going to begin seeing this "long term damage?"
6 posted on
01/10/2010 5:39:00 PM PST by
davisfh
( Islam is a very serious mental and social illness)
To: writer33
Screw CBS, Politico, and Steve Schmitt. And throw in McCane
7 posted on
01/10/2010 5:39:02 PM PST by
gunner03
To: writer33
CBS ‘60 MINUTES IGNORES HARRY REID ‘NEGRO’ REVELATION DURING INTERVIEW WITH ‘GAME CHANGE’ BOOK AUTHORS... DEVELOPING...
per Drudge
8 posted on
01/10/2010 5:39:07 PM PST by
kcvl
To: writer33
Schmidt has trouble with loyalty. That makes him a totally worthless human being in my eyes. He needs to go over to the Obamites and stay there.
9 posted on
01/10/2010 5:39:59 PM PST by
FlingWingFlyer
(Remember in November! Throw all of the bums out!)
To: writer33
Typical McCainiac/Romney guy. The GOP needs a good house cleaning.
To: writer33
Since he claimed ther were “many instances” of untruths, he could be a lot more credible if he described some specifically. I doubt he can.
11 posted on
01/10/2010 5:40:17 PM PST by
norwaypinesavage
(Galileo: In science, the authority of a thousand is not worth the humble reasoning of one individual)
To: writer33
Boy, Stevie really hated having Palin on the ticket, lol. He is trying SO HARD to hurt her, just like he tried to do during the campaign.
'Sumptin' tells me that ol Stevie is a 'widdle' angry at Palin for not bending over....poor baby.
I think Sarah Palin is a gift to this hurting nation by God, myself. And I also think that the single most important thing McCain ever did aside from his HEROIC ACTIONS in our MILITARY SERVICE and his TREMENDOUS SUPPORT OF OUR TROOPS is that he INTRODUCED the GOVERNOR of ALASKA to this nation.
Note to Steve: You lose.
12 posted on
01/10/2010 5:41:29 PM PST by
Republic
(Get the uhbama's, reid's, pelosi's dirty greedy fingers out of our personal medical care!)
To: writer33
Better yet, how many pieces has Politico devoted to Obama’s “trouble with truth”? This is nothing more than evidence of left wing journalists reporting on what other left wing journalists have to say.
15 posted on
01/10/2010 5:42:24 PM PST by
HarleyD
To: writer33
McCain, standing up for the ladies, are ya’?
16 posted on
01/10/2010 5:42:48 PM PST by
Gene Eric
(Your Hope has been redistributed. Here's your Change.)
To: writer33
No wonder the GOP is noted as the “stupid party”, with cannibals like this Schmidt character pushing his puss in front of the leftist MSM camera.
I know, I know , I know the pitfalls of a third party, but damn, sometimes....
To: writer33
I read the politico article and I couldn’t find a single example of how “Palin has trouble with [the] truth.” I saw mention of what could (charitibly) be called a difference of opinion, with absolutely no facts to back up Mr. Schmidt’s criticism.
19 posted on
01/10/2010 5:43:05 PM PST by
Steely Tom
(Obama goes on long after the thrill of Obama is gone)
To: writer33
Then I think Schmidt has trouble with his shoe laces.
22 posted on
01/10/2010 5:44:02 PM PST by
theymakemesick
(Full of hatred for those that disagree, liberal democrats are the most intolerant bigots on Earth)
To: writer33
Yeah, Right! McCain was well on his way to a landslide victory until he brought Sarah on board. I believe that. I really, really do. What the hell are these people on?
23 posted on
01/10/2010 5:44:18 PM PST by
Bad Jack Bauer
(Fat and Bald? I was BORN fat and bald, thank you very much!)
To: writer33
Still reading Palin’s book. Schmidt acted like an arrogant jerk in it. I am imagining he didn’t like the characterization, though she is only saying what happened: she is not calling him any names in the book. But he set her up to fail. In fact, last night while reading, I wondered by his actions during the campaign if he was secretly working for Obama. Straight Talk Express, my foot.
25 posted on
01/10/2010 5:44:40 PM PST by
Yaelle
To: writer33
The people who worked for McCain have done nothing but attack Sarah. Both during the election campaign and afterwards they called her a “whack job” and other insults.
They screwed up the McCain campaign and now have tried to make a career of attacking Sarah. Why hasn't McCain told these people to shut up? Why hasn't McCain come out defending Sarah? The Republican establishment has tried to destroy Sarah. Do you notice that no Democrat politicians attack her publicly? Just the McCain people.
To: writer33
Who is putting these Romney keywords in? It’s disgusting.
32 posted on
01/10/2010 5:45:52 PM PST by
Bahbah
(Only dead fish go with the flow)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-78 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson