Since he claimed ther were “many instances” of untruths, he could be a lot more credible if he described some specifically. I doubt he can.
Yeah - typical democrat-type tactic. Say something with no facts to back it up, but knowing that the MSM will reliably pick it up and repeat it ad nauseam.
I'm with you. I'd like specifics. If there were any facts to back up this round of Palin bashing, I'm sure we'd hear all the evidence to support their claims. Instead, it's another round of mud slinging just like the charges that she's getting divorced, not the mother of Trig, and that she likes to ban books before they're written.