Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Prince William fans Falkland's fury
The Australian ^ | 3rd February 2009

Posted on 02/02/2009 6:02:42 PM PST by naturalman1975

PRINCE William's military deployment to the Falkland Islands has reignited the row over the archipelago's sovereignty.

"This circumstance only serves to once again highlight Britain's ongoing military presence in land and sea areas that are part of the Argentine Republic's national territories," an aide to Foreign Minister Jorge Taina said today.

Argentina claims ownership of the islands it calls the Malvinas.

Prince William will be sent to the Falklands by the Royal Air Force to serve as a search and rescue pilot for a period of three months, Britain's Daily Telegraph reports.

He completes his 18-month RAF course later this year.

(Excerpt) Read more at theaustralian.news.com.au ...


TOPICS: Australia/New Zealand; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: falklands; princewilliam; raf; royals; sorelosers
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

1 posted on 02/02/2009 6:02:42 PM PST by naturalman1975
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: naturalman1975

2 posted on 02/02/2009 6:04:06 PM PST by naturalman1975 ("America was under attack. Australia was immediately there to help." - John Winston Howard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: naturalman1975

The British Empire is down to 4 islands, The Rock and Northern Ireland.


3 posted on 02/02/2009 6:06:42 PM PST by AU72
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: naturalman1975

Here we go again! Unfortunately, the RN is a shadow of it’s former self.


4 posted on 02/02/2009 6:06:49 PM PST by neodad (USS Vincennes (CG 49) "Freedom's Fortress")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: naturalman1975

Argentines are worse scammers than the Nigerians, they only do it with a latino accent. They truly believe that they are entitled to whatever is closest to them, including little things like...oh say...Uruguay and Paraguay.


5 posted on 02/02/2009 6:11:09 PM PST by festusbanjo (they'll smile now, but in 4 years they'll still be stupid, broke and looking for a handout.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: neodad

The Brits could never again pull off what they managed in 1983. That Navy is gone.


6 posted on 02/02/2009 6:17:29 PM PST by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: AU72

A lot more than 4 Islands.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_overseas_territories#Current_Overseas_Territories


7 posted on 02/02/2009 6:26:23 PM PST by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: naturalman1975
We visited the Falkland Islands in December 2004 (summertime there) ... it was sad to see how much of the area was off-limits due to mines planted by the Argentines. We did, however, LOVE seeing these guys ...


8 posted on 02/02/2009 6:30:18 PM PST by PERKY2004 (Proud Military Wife -- my DH is in his 26th year of military service! PRAY 4 OUR TROOPS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: naturalman1975
Don't make us come back there... Photobucket
9 posted on 02/02/2009 6:39:28 PM PST by rahbert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

Why is it that none of the male royals is ever put in the jet pipeline? Much less risky than being in choppers or an armoured unit. And good to see you old man.


10 posted on 02/02/2009 6:42:15 PM PST by Bedford Forrest (Roger, Contact, Judy, Out. Fox One. Splash one.<I>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Bedford Forrest

I’d think the investment in training time wouldn’t be worth the time actually spent on duty. It would take a slot from a pilot who would actually make a career out of it.


11 posted on 02/02/2009 6:47:55 PM PST by kms61
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Bedford Forrest

Do you think jets are safer than helos and armor? I wouldn’t say that.


12 posted on 02/02/2009 6:52:51 PM PST by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: rahbert

I don’t think today’s RN could come back. The 1983 navy is gone.


13 posted on 02/02/2009 6:53:46 PM PST by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

It’s not the ships. It’s the men.


14 posted on 02/02/2009 6:55:43 PM PST by AppyPappy (If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

I sincerely doubt it would take the Royal Navy to defeat whatever the Argentines could muster to throw at the Faulklands.

I’m sure the Argentine navy ain’t what it was in ‘83 either—and could easily be dispatched by a couple cruise missiles....


15 posted on 02/02/2009 7:04:13 PM PST by AnalogReigns
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: naturalman1975

“‘Scuse me professah, what fawkin’ islands you talkin’ about?”


16 posted on 02/02/2009 7:06:00 PM PST by FReepaholic (Diversity = .45 .357 .223 .38 ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AU72
The British Empire is down to 4 islands, The Rock and Northern Ireland.

I don't know about that but I do know that the British Empire was the greatest force for good the world has ever known. It was the largest empire and at its height controlled one fourth of the world's population and land area. The decline of the British Empire may be a good thing in politically correct circles but the world is still a poorer place without the British Empire.

17 posted on 02/02/2009 7:08:08 PM PST by Larry381 (Join BlueServo and protect your border.(http://www.blueservo.net/))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: AU72
Don't forget Pitcairn Island, St. Helena, Ascension Island, Turks and Caicos Islands, Bermuda, and scattered other pinpricks of land.

In 1820 Argentina claims the islands as heir to Spanish claims.
1823: President Monroe proclaims that the New World was no longer to be subject to new colonization by the European powers.
1833: Britain takes control of the Falkland Islands (Malvinas).
1895: President Cleveland considers a territorial dispute between Britain and Venezuela to be covered by the Monroe Doctrine.
1982: Argentina captures the islands by force, and loses them again a couple of months later--the US sides with the UK.

Maybe 149 years is too long a period to let one's claims go unenforced.

18 posted on 02/02/2009 7:08:11 PM PST by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: AnalogReigns

The RN has lost its ability to project power in a meaningful way. Sure, Argentina might also be weaker, but other threats will emerge, and Britain will be forced to kowtow or turn tail.


19 posted on 02/02/2009 7:09:32 PM PST by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee
Do you think jets are safer than helos and armor? I wouldn’t say that.

True, you can get things up your tailpipe that will give you a heluva surprise.

20 posted on 02/02/2009 7:17:17 PM PST by BerryDingle (I know how to deal with communists, I still wear their scars on my back from Hollywood-Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson