Skip to comments.
Golden Compass Getting Bad Reviews
rottentomatoes ^
| 12-6-07
| self
Posted on 12/06/2007 8:55:37 AM PST by icwhatudo
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 121-126 next last
To: Dr. I. C. Spots
“judgement” is the #1 feared word on the left.
61
posted on
12/06/2007 10:45:48 AM PST
by
MrB
(You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
To: arderkrag
I’ll ask Richard, a friend of mine (I run with a strange crowd!) who develops and publishes RPG’s. Ever heard of “Bureau 13” or “Fringeworthy”? He’s the creator. He keeps up on gaming news and knows a LOT of people in the biz so I’ll check with him.
I’m betting it’s tied up in licensing. Boy, I’d buy the Sourcebook just for all the lovely detail out of the Silmarillion!
62
posted on
12/06/2007 10:46:05 AM PST
by
Kieri
(Midwest Snark Claw & Feather Club Founder)
To: metesky
LOL.....did she think that line would encourage families to go see it?
63
posted on
12/06/2007 10:47:20 AM PST
by
tioga
(Dear Santa..........I can explain....)
To: mdmathis6
Sort of how God might play chess with the Devil!Who then throws a tantrum and starts randomly breaking as many pieces as he can even after he has lost the game . . .
64
posted on
12/06/2007 10:47:23 AM PST
by
Greg F
(Duncan Hunter is a good man.)
To: zencat
The film isn't really anti-religion, especially at anywhere near
the hysteria some have assumed.
But that's the point for some folks.
They understand that the anti-religion of the book has been
purposely diluted.
To increase the chance of good boxoffice $$$$...and a greenlight
for the next film in the series.
At which point it might be safe to make the next film more faithful
to the source book.
Having the first film with much less anti-religionism is a smart
move for two reasons:
1. $$$$$$$$$
2. a kinder, gentler incrementalist route to "spreading the (atheist) word".
65
posted on
12/06/2007 10:49:08 AM PST
by
VOA
To: Kieri
Ill ask Richard, a friend of mine (I run with a strange crowd!) who develops and publishes RPGs. Ever heard of Bureau 13 or Fringeworthy? Hes the creator. He keeps up on gaming news and knows a LOT of people in the biz so Ill check with him. Im betting its tied up in licensing. Boy, Id buy the Sourcebook just for all the lovely detail out of the Silmarillion!Oh for cryn' out loud...I meant "Narnia," NOT "Lord of the Rings"
I need to talk to my doctor about my meds....sorry!
66
posted on
12/06/2007 10:49:33 AM PST
by
Kieri
(Midwest Snark Claw & Feather Club Founder)
To: MrB
The only bad review that I want to see on this movie is a negative return on investment for those that sank money into it.If "Compass" came out last Friday, I don't remember seeing any box office numbers on Monday. Normally Drudge posts them when an anti-US, anti-military film flops but there's no word about this mess.
67
posted on
12/06/2007 10:51:27 AM PST
by
Kieri
(Midwest Snark Claw & Feather Club Founder)
To: arderkrag
The trick would be getting the RPG to reward upright behavior, and discouraging violence while rewarding skill therein when unavoidable.
Being interested in game writing, I’m puzzling over the problem of porting books to games: the latter focus on achieving an unbroken chain of successes, whereas stories are interesting precisely because the protagonist _fails_ to some degree. Ex.: “Romeo and Juliet: The Game” would suck precisely because the end goal would have to be “and they lived happily ever after”; a tragedy is great material precisely because the main character _loses_.
68
posted on
12/06/2007 10:53:39 AM PST
by
ctdonath2
(The color blue tastes like the square root of 0?)
To: ctdonath2
The trick would be getting the RPG to reward upright behavior, and discouraging violence while rewarding skill therein when unavoidable.
D&D 4th ed., which is in the works, will include a "social challenge" mechanic which will reward players based on roleplay goals.
69
posted on
12/06/2007 10:57:06 AM PST
by
arderkrag
(Libertarian Nutcase (Political Compass Coordinates: 9.00, -2.62 - www.politicalcompass.org))
To: Kieri
Cool. I’m the creator of mudgrips and big rigs, a homebrew d20 game downloadable for free at http://www.geocities.com/arderkrag. If he decides to look into it, tell him I’ll be happy to collaborate design ideas.
70
posted on
12/06/2007 10:58:43 AM PST
by
arderkrag
(Libertarian Nutcase (Political Compass Coordinates: 9.00, -2.62 - www.politicalcompass.org))
To: Kieri; MrB
Released December 1, 2007 (sneak peek)
December 7, 2007
Production Budget $250,000,000
Prints and Advertising Budget $59,000,000
Gross is 0 . . . release tommorrow.
71
posted on
12/06/2007 11:07:58 AM PST
by
Greg F
(Duncan Hunter is a good man.)
To: zencat
The film isn't really anti-religion, especially at anywhere near the hysteria some have assumed.
I haven't seen the film, but the trilogy was okay until towards the end, when the author went into a positively wacko anti-religion rant for several chapters which had nothing to do with the story. Same with another series of his I read, except this time the target was capitalism.
C.S. Lewis he ain't. Supposedly J.K Rowling based Gilderoy, one of the characters in the Potter series, upon the author of these books.
To: Cicero
My 13 year old received a few emails from various circles of friends alerting her to the anti-religion theme. She has passed it on to other groups of kid. So it is not just the Catholic League getting the word.
This is the age group the movie can't lose. They are old enough to see the movie, but young enough to need an adult's extra ticket price. If they don't go, who will? From the trailer it looks too scary for kids 9 and under and looks too childish for High School kids.
I'm glad she doesn't want to see it. We saw the trailers over Thanksgiving and it looked boring. When ever reviews praise the special effects or cinematography first, you know the story stinks.
To: Greg F
$309 mill + sunk into this bad boy...
so even if it grosses 200 mill, it’ll be a “victory”.
74
posted on
12/06/2007 11:13:06 AM PST
by
MrB
(You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
To: MrB
Yah, they bet someone’s farm on this picture.
75
posted on
12/06/2007 11:21:59 AM PST
by
Greg F
(Duncan Hunter is a good man.)
To: ctdonath2
“Perelandra” would make a very good game with those characteristics . . . victory in one section would not be victory in the next and so forth.
76
posted on
12/06/2007 11:23:55 AM PST
by
Greg F
(Duncan Hunter is a good man.)
To: tx_eggman
"You will not surely die," the serpent said to the woman. "For God knows that when you eat of it your eyes will be opened, and you will be like God, knowing good and evilGen. 3:22 And the LORD God said, "The man has now become like one of us, knowing good and evil. He must not be allowed to reach out his hand and take also from the tree of life and eat, and live forever."
Guess the serpent was right about the good and evil part. And it wasn't sure that they would die. It was only because God specifically ensured it by preventing them from eating from the tread of life. Sounds to me like that ol' serpent knew what he was talking about. ;-)
To: ConfusedAndLovingIt
Appropriate “handle” . . .!
78
posted on
12/06/2007 11:33:54 AM PST
by
Greg F
(Duncan Hunter is a good man.)
To: NavyCanDo
79
posted on
12/06/2007 11:38:48 AM PST
by
ZULU
(Non nobis, non nobis Domine, sed nomini tuo da gloriam. God, guts and guns made America great.)
To: Betty Jane
I printed out a copy of the NYPost book review to show my grandchildren, because this is the kind of movie they would normally want to see. The main talking point is that it’s booooring.
80
posted on
12/06/2007 11:43:53 AM PST
by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 121-126 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson