Posted on 09/07/2007 5:43:46 AM PDT by nuconvert
Bush, Roh have testy exchange at summit
By DEB RIECHMANN, Associated Press Writer
President Bush's talks with South Korean President Roh Moo-hyun ended on a sour note Friday not over the war in Iraq, but rather the Korean conflict that ended with a truce more than five decades ago.
As Bush began to wind down his stay at the Asia-Pacific summit, Roh challenged him to make a declaration to end the Korean War. That conflict ended in a truce in 1953, not a peace treaty, so the two sides technically remain at war.
The awkward exchange occurred during the first in a series of sit-downs that Bush had here with leaders from Pacific Rim nations. He also spoke Friday with Russian President Vladimir Putin and will meet on Saturday with the leaders of Japan, Indonesia and Australia. Protesters plan a march through the city on Saturday, a day after scuffles broke out between riot police and some demonstrators.
Bush's talks with Roh focused on the six-nation negotiations to get North Korea to give up its nuclear ambitions. Soon after the mini diplomatic incident, Christopher Hill, the U.S. envoy handling the talks with Pyongyang, announced that nuclear experts from the U.S., China and Russia will travel to North Korea next week to survey nuclear facilities due to be shut down.
Bush said that during his talks with Roh, he reaffirmed the U.S. position that Washington will consider the war formally over only when North Korean leader Kim Jong Il actually dismantles his nuclear program.
Whatever Roh heard Bush say through his translator, it wasn't good enough.
"I think I did not hear President Bush mention the — a declaration to end the Korean War just now," Roh said as cameras clicked and television cameras rolled.
Bush said he thought he was being clear, but obliged Roh and restated the U.S. position.
That wasn't good enough either. "If you could be a little bit clearer in your message," Roh said.
Bush, now looking irritated, replied: "I can't make it any more clear, Mr. President. We look forward to the day when we can end the Korean War. That will end — will happen when Kim verifiably gets rid of his weapons programs and his weapons."
The White House immediately downplayed the testy exchange and said the meeting went smoothly.
"There was clearly something lost in translation," National Security Council spokesman Gordon Johndroe said in a rushed e-mail to reporters.
"I really think the interpreter must not have conveyed the president's comments entirely clearly," Johndroe said. "The president made clear in his opening remarks that he told Roh that the U.S. is committed to a peace agreement once North Korea complies."
And despite Roh's challenge for Bush to make a declaration to end the war, the war was not between the United States and the North but between the North and the United Nations, and Bush alone could not end the war with a simple declaration. "As we say, `all parties involved,' " Johndroe said, when asked about the mechanics of achieving a peace treaty.
In June 1950, the U.N. Security Council, acting on a resolution advanced by the United States, adopted a resolution calling on its member states to help South Korea repel an invasion by the North.
U.S. troops commanded by Gen. Douglas MacArthur went to battle on the side of the South Korea troops in a war that went on until late July 1953, when the fighting stopped, and an uneasy truce has been in place ever since.
The Bush-Roh photo-op began with the usual diplomatic pleasantries.
Bush said he and Roh had a "friendly and frank" discussion. He thanked South Korea for providing support for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and spoke optimistically about negotiations that the United States, South Korea, Russia, China and Japan are having to pressure the communist regime in Pyongyang to end its nuclear programs.
The president noted Roh's upcoming meeting with the communist leader and urged him to tell Kim that he needs to honor his agreements.
Bush said that in his meeting with Putin, the two leaders talked about missile defense and fishing.
Moscow bitterly opposes a U.S. plan to base an anti-missile radar system in the Czech Republican and interceptor missiles in Poland. Led by Putin, it has reacted forcefully against the idea, saying it would spark a new arms race and a repositioning of its missiles. Putin has proposed instead that Russia and the United States share a Russian-rented radar station in Azerbaijan and that missiles could be deployed at sea or in nations such as Turkey.
At Bush's side, Putin asserted that the leaders had agreed that experts from the two sides should meet again and travel to Azerbaijan. Bush made no comment on this.
"We have once again said that it is necessary that our experts meet again very soon and make another trip to Azerbaijan to the Gabala radio location station," Putin said. "By saying this, we confirm that the process of our joint work on this — in this direction — is under way."
Bush chose not to talk specifics at the U.S.-Russia photo-op. Instead, he noted how Putin had recalled his recent stay at Bush's parents home in Kennebunkport, Maine. Putin said they both believe it would be fun to go fishing together in Siberia.
"For a minute, I thought he brought up the Kennebunkport visit to remind me that he was the only one who caught the fish," Bush said.
Earlier in the day, though, Bush took a jab at the rollback of democratic reforms under Putin's leadership.
"We'll continue to work with nations like Russia to advance our shared interests while encouraging Russia's leaders to respect the checks and balances that are essential to democracy," Bush said in a speech to business leaders at the summit.
So, was it a problem with translation? Or was Roh just not getting the answer he wanted?
Since Roh insists the conflict is over, bring home our troops.
Regards
“Bush, now looking irritated, replied: ‘I can’t make it any more clear, Mr. President. We look forward to the day when we can end the Korean War. That will end — will happen when Kim verifiably gets rid of his weapons programs and his weapons.’”
Very once in a while, Pres. Bush pisses ya off, then he says something like this and makes you proud all over again.
Stand your ground President Bush.
RUH-ROH!....................
I’ll throw in my joe-six-pack type analysis here. The S. Korean pres. is a punk. He should have unleashed the Republic of Korea marines on Afghanistan when they took the S. Korean hostages. He bends over for every terrorist and thug he gets the opportunity to bend over for . . .
100 percent agree. SK funnels American cash and food aid to the NKs. If they want to call it a wrap; so be it.
Truman had already withdrawn US troops from S. Korea in 1949 and his Secretary of State (Acheson) said we were not interested in influencing events in the Korean peninsula any longer.
Of course, when North Korea invaded S. Korea in 1950 Truman realized the troop-withdrawal was a disastrous mistake.
Truman got the UN to agree to take charge of re-winning S. Korea's freedom.
30,000 Americans died in Korea, fighting under the UN in the remaining 30 months of Truman's presidency.
The Korean War marked the first time in history that the United Nations sent armed forces into combat to stop aggression. Armed forces and medical support units from 20 United Nations member states, along with the Republic of Korea and Italy, teamed together under the United Nations banner to halt the attempted communist takeover of the Republic of Korea.
Exactly!
Worst case: The thousands of NK artillery tubes trained on Seoul open up and pound it to dust.
Roh is an idiot.
If he really wants a settlement, Roh should talk to this fellow-Korean who is Secretary General of the UN, Ban-Ki Moon
Is Roh deliberately snubbing Ban?
I knew it was time to leave a few years ago when SK took bids on a fighter jet replacement FROM FRANCE.
As long as we are sure we never want to go back to Korea.
History shows that Murtha is wrong about the ease with which troops can be redeployed.
Truman abandoned a young and unstable S. Korea in 1949 (we had freed S. Korea from decades of Japanese occupation in 1945). Truman's Secretary of State, Acheson, stated that the US was no longer interested in protecting the Korean peninsula.
Then, after North Korea invaded the South in June, 1950, Truman changed his mind.
Truman decided to send troops back to S. Korea to fight "a police action" against "bandits."
(I guess we could say, "Truman lied and good men died," because the so-called "police action" against "bandits" resulted in the deaths of 30,000 Americans in 30 months. That's 10 times the number of US deaths per month in Iraq).
Those men would not have been killed if we had kept our troops in S. Korea in 1949.
"Most everyone agrees that had the U.S. troops remained, there would have been no war."
A BRIEF ACCOUNT OF THE KOREAN WAR, By Jack D. Walker
Ironically, a Democratic administration which had washed its hands of S. Korea in 1949 ended up imposing the severest wartime press censorship in memory and found it necessary to ramp up the military draft.
the dumbocrats do not know the meaning of "learn from your mistakes"
Roh, Roh, Roh your boat, gently down the stream...
Why do we still have troops defending that ungrateful country? Pull them out and be done with it.
You forgot [in Astro’s voice] “ruh-roh Reorge!”
That's really the whole story here.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.