Posted on 09/28/2006 6:50:49 PM PDT by redstate38
Clinton bashing? Clinton is rightly being exposed as the liar and bully he is. America is waking up to the fact that eight years of this man as president was very costly in American lives, and his failure to do his job has led to the war we are in now.
These are your quotes, (from post #10), for all the world to see:
"Wallace, I'm sorry to say, came across as smirky, dishonest, and smarmy."
"He's (Clinton) got the right where he wants them, and they are spluttering and feigning indignance - for example, this article is a piece of fluff."
"The Right just lost a battle against a formidable opponent."
"We just witnessed the intensity, the eloquence, and the ideological passion that we want to see from a Republican President, and we never will."
---
It's clear which team you are cheering for. And the last three words I've quoted from you are undeniable proof of your political bent.
Case closed.
"Therefore, the American people have wisely established a custom against allowing any man to hold that office for more than two consecutive terms. But every shred of power which a President exercises while in office vanishes absolutely when he has once left office. An ex-President stands precisely in the position of any other private citizen, and has not one particle more power to secure a nomination or election than if he had never held office at all, indeed, he probably has less because of the very fact that he has held the office." - Theodore Roosevelt
(Responding to my previous comments).
"Wallace, I'm sorry to say, came across as smirky, dishonest, and smarmy."
He did. I didn't say he was wrong, I was reacting to how he came across, probably unintentionally. I'm sure he's a great guy. I'm just calling it how I saw it.
"He's (Clinton) got the right where he wants them, and they are spluttering and feigning indignance - for example, this article is a piece of fluff."
Again, the article opens by suggesting that Clinton physically abused and intimidated him to the point of criminality. Ridiculous. You shouldn't have to be a Clinton-lover to see this.
"The Right just lost a battle against a formidable opponent."
Clinton is a formidible opponent for the Right, and a great politician. Is this not true?
"We just witnessed the intensity, the eloquence, and the ideological passion that we want to see from a Republican President, and we never will."
Sorry, I meant from Bush. Do you think Bush is up to the task of unleashing a well-deserved and eloquent verbal storm to a biased newsman?
I admire Bush, but he's not. But I would be cheering him if he pulled it off. He's always "rising" above the fray, leaving the dirty work to the bloggers and the conservative media. I'd like to see him defend himself and conservative ideas forcefully and eloquently for once.
Steady, Dog. This was a very carefully choreographed media event. It's not something you'll ever see a Republican do. And mores the pity.
I'm always delighted when people are rational, informed and accurate.
"He possibly could have been charged with assault and battery against the Fox host."
What do you think of this statement by the author? It was my first thought when I saw his interview.
Again:
I think that if the tables were turned, and a Republican had menacingly leaned over a lefty and tapped his knee with his finger while dressing him down, we'd be cheering.
And if the left made comments about "assault and battery" as a result, we'd be all over them, sneering at them, laughing at their "wimpiness".
>>Clinton is a formidible opponent for the Right, and a great politician. Is this not true? <<
Yes, this is not true. Clinton is becoming weaker, less respected, and more discredited with each passing day.
Clinton is a known liar and a cartoon figure. The man is lampooned even by his own side, and Hillary is universally reviled.
Which is as it should be.
You are on the wrong side of history, but I hope you and the rest of your liberal cronies keep trying to prop up your disgraced hero, as you lose election after election after election.
I have no more time for your foolishness. Good night.
Why are you "delighted"?
I'm always delighted when people are rational, informed and accurate.
No.
You're "delighted" in the same way Bush-haters are delighted when they hear someone call him a baby-killing moron. It's like an initiation. Same irrational hatred, different camp.
Why can't you rise above this?
Not even close. He never got out of the 40s in percentage of popular vote. He WAS smart enough to bribe the jug eared little jerk from EDS to run and skim off 19% the first time and a little less the second.
Too bad for Perot that HillaryCare was a complete and pitiful washout so he never got his payoff. ROTFL.
I know Perot always said that he drew evenly from Rs and Ds, but Ds he drew from were the Reagan Democrats who would have voted Republican.
BTW I hope Clinton campaigns furiously for all the extreme left wing moon bats bacause his record is VERY good for US. I especially remember when he and his people diverted all that money from other races to Florida to defeat J. Bush and he campaigned so hard for... who was it?... I can't remember.
Normally I don't water the plants when I want them to dry up and wither away, but this has been fun. Good night.
Actually, I watched the exchange and tried to suspend my animus against the Impeached One for the nonce.
My impartial? thought was "Why is this guy being so aggressive? He's a former President of the United States, for eff's sake. Former Presidents don't need to be so unseemly."
While he might have fired up the 20% of the Left that are nutcases, I think that most people retain in their minds the "I did not have sexual relations with that young woman, etc."
Just my take.
I wish I could believe that, but I don't. I think Clinton and company never intended to do anything about Bin Laden for reasons of their own. For one thing, they hate the military, and for another, it was more politically expedient for them to pretend that we had peace and prosperity during those golden years. Of course we didn't, it was all a facade created in part by Hillary and the compliant media that adores her. The only terrorists they wanted voters to see were those nasty right wingers who were out to get them while they were working hard for America! (Marxism actually)
Don't you belong to that other site? I really, really think you are on the wrong one.
And can you imagine the Secret Service's "devotion" to John Kerry had he won the election?
Recall his description of the SS agent on the ski slope: "I don't fall down." "The son of a b*tch knocked me over."
Of course I dubbed him a Weeble after that faux pas. "Weebles Wobble But They Don't Fall Down!"
I watched the interview. As I saw BC snarl back at Wallace, I didn't hear any words beyond: "I didn't have sex with that woman!" He's a convicted liar and now when he wants credibility, he has none.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.