Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SerpentDove

(Responding to my previous comments).

"Wallace, I'm sorry to say, came across as smirky, dishonest, and smarmy."

He did. I didn't say he was wrong, I was reacting to how he came across, probably unintentionally. I'm sure he's a great guy. I'm just calling it how I saw it.


"He's (Clinton) got the right where he wants them, and they are spluttering and feigning indignance - for example, this article is a piece of fluff."

Again, the article opens by suggesting that Clinton physically abused and intimidated him to the point of criminality. Ridiculous. You shouldn't have to be a Clinton-lover to see this.

"The Right just lost a battle against a formidable opponent."

Clinton is a formidible opponent for the Right, and a great politician. Is this not true?


63 posted on 09/28/2006 9:04:23 PM PDT by LostDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]


To: LostDog
"He possibly could have been charged with assault and battery against the Fox host."

What do you think of this statement by the author? It was my first thought when I saw his interview.
64 posted on 09/28/2006 9:06:36 PM PDT by DocRock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

To: LostDog

"We just witnessed the intensity, the eloquence, and the ideological passion that we want to see from a Republican President, and we never will."



Sorry, I meant from Bush. Do you think Bush is up to the task of unleashing a well-deserved and eloquent verbal storm to a biased newsman?

I admire Bush, but he's not. But I would be cheering him if he pulled it off. He's always "rising" above the fray, leaving the dirty work to the bloggers and the conservative media. I'd like to see him defend himself and conservative ideas forcefully and eloquently for once.


65 posted on 09/28/2006 9:09:20 PM PDT by LostDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

To: LostDog

>>Clinton is a formidible opponent for the Right, and a great politician. Is this not true? <<

Yes, this is not true. Clinton is becoming weaker, less respected, and more discredited with each passing day.

Clinton is a known liar and a cartoon figure. The man is lampooned even by his own side, and Hillary is universally reviled.

Which is as it should be.

You are on the wrong side of history, but I hope you and the rest of your liberal cronies keep trying to prop up your disgraced hero, as you lose election after election after election.

I have no more time for your foolishness. Good night.


69 posted on 09/28/2006 9:13:37 PM PDT by SerpentDove (It's not rocket surgery.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

To: LostDog
Clinton is a formidible opponent for the Right, and a great politician. Is this not true?

Not even close. He never got out of the 40s in percentage of popular vote. He WAS smart enough to bribe the jug eared little jerk from EDS to run and skim off 19% the first time and a little less the second.

Too bad for Perot that HillaryCare was a complete and pitiful washout so he never got his payoff. ROTFL.

I know Perot always said that he drew evenly from Rs and Ds, but Ds he drew from were the Reagan Democrats who would have voted Republican.

72 posted on 09/28/2006 9:20:18 PM PDT by Sal (Once you know they sold USA out to Red China, what do you think they would NOT do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson