Posted on 09/28/2006 6:50:49 PM PDT by redstate38
President Bill Clinton was overbearing, threatening, and in the face of "FOX News Sunday" host Chris Wallace. The wild eyed, finger wagging Clinton was astonishing to watch and embarrassing. He possibly could have been charged with assault and battery against the Fox host.
Chris Wallace, the son of liberal 60 Minutes correspondent Mike Wallace, appeared to be overwhelmed by the ire of his guest. Clinton was ready to pounce on anything the mild mannered interviewer asked. In most states, an assault/battery is committed when one person 1) tries to or does physically strike another, or 2) acts in a threatening manner to put another in fear of immediate harm. http://criminal.findlaw.com/crimes/a-z/assault_battery.html
We can now add "the physical bullying factor" to the The National Democrat Party's list of un-pleasantries. CNN's Paul Begalla was quoted as saying that Bill Clinton's raging antics were a plus for the DNC. Begalla describes what took place as "a spinal transplant."
Excerpts of transcript: William Jefferson Clinton on 'FOX News Sunday with videos
WALLACE: When we announced that you were going to be on "Fox News Sunday," I got a lot of e-mail from viewers. And I've got to say, I was surprised. Most of them wanted me to ask you this question: Why didn't you do more to put bin Laden and Al Qaeda out of business when you were president?
There's a new book out, I suspect you've already read, called "The Looming Tower." And it talks about how the fact that when you pulled troops out of Somalia in 1993, bin Laden said, "I have seen the frailty and the weakness and the cowardice of U.S. troops." Then there was the bombing of the embassies in Africa and the attack on the Cole.
CLINTON: OK, let's just go through that.
WALLACE: Let me — let me — may I just finish the question, sir?
And after the attack, the book says that Bin Laden separated his leaders, spread them around, because he expected an attack, and there was no response.
I understand that hindsight is always 20/20. ...
CLINTON: No, let's talk about " http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,215397,00.html
The interview was further insight to the sociopath who once led our nation. Those who are leading the Democrat Party are out of control. They continue to crumble into a wreck heap of angry snarling people. They are strident and mean spirited because they feel like it.
Belligerent attacks against the Bush administration are wrong. President Bush has been successfully running our country for more than five years. He has kept America safe since 9/11 and continues to fight the war on terror. Also, he has helped two countries establish their own democracies.
The interview was sadly reminiscent of President William Jefferson Blythe III Clinton pointing his finger at the TV cameras and denying the shame he brought to himself, his wife, his family, and our country.
Maybe President Clinton feels guilty for not capturing Osama Bin Laden. Could it be because he was preoccupied with other matters rather than taking care of his presidential responsibilities?
What Mr. Clinton needs is a course in anger management. He should not have taken his misguided hostilities out on a Fox employee. The man looked totally unhinged, as he gave America another Kodak moment, forever etched in our minds.
The Monica Lewinsky debacle helped ruin Bill Clinton's presidency. Don't forget, he was impeached because he lied under oath about Paula Jones. Those accusing fingers are pointing right back to Clinton for the ridicules scandals. There was no right wing conspiracy forcing Bill Clinton to act like a fool with other women. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_Clinton#Investigation_and_impeachment
The DNC ideologues have managed to divide our nation at a time in history when all Americans need to pull together in harmony. The left have willfully confused the reasons we are fighting a war on terror, as well as trying to undermine the president's efforts to protect us from further terrorist attacks. They are despicable and void of integrity.
Marie Jon' is a political/religious-based writer. She is the founder of www.DrawingClose.org/ — a sister website to RenewAmerica. Marie's work has appeared on many sites, including The New Media Journal, ChronWatch, and Commonconservative, to name a few. She is a regular columnist for Capitolhillcoffeehouse, The Daley Times Post, RenewAmerica, The Conservative Voice, and Newsbull.
Marie brings a refreshing and spirited point of view that is reflected in her writings, as well as a genuine and spiritual opinion regarding God and his teachings. Marie is an practicing Christian, a nurse, a student, and a patriot. Many of Marie's articles are a reflection of her great admiration for those serving in Iraq and Afghanistan. She is an advocate for the troops, as well as the Blue and Gold Star Mothers of America, and their families. Marie has appeared as a guest with political talk show host Bruce Elliot on WBAL, 1090 AM.
"Al Qaeda grew as Monica Blew"
Because the media loves and needs a Clinton of some sort.
And Roger hasn't announced his candidacy.
>>I'm not going to attempt to validate my "right-wing" credentials, <<
Because you can't. Libs like you always start their rants by highlighting how "conservative" they are, and use sentences like "We conservatives need to do such-and-such"
>>but I will say that it's pretty sickening to see a bunch of fellow right-wingers...<<
Perfect example. Get lost, and go back to DU where you belong, troll.
LostDog
Since Feb 24, 2005
Does anyone have the number for the dogcatcher. I think we have a resident for the pound.
And a total of 4 posts until tonight.
.."And Roger hasn't announced his candidacy."
Roger. Roger Wabbitt?
If I believe Clinton was stunningly effective in an interview, this means I support abortion, gay-marriage, high taxes, socialism, and affirmative action?
If you believe that the Seahawks played a good game, does that make you a rabid Seattle fan?
Sorry, dude. You're wrong.
And what's with the "mob" mentality here? I never expected to see it here for some strange reason, and it's something I've always accused the Left of. I really do expect a higher standard from the Right. I guess I was wrong.
"intensity, eloquence, ideological passion...." (from Clinton) in other words, forceful lies, glib-sounding lies, lies wrapped up in highmindedness having nothing to do with reality. I didn't see the entire interview but what I did see was Clinton Business-as-Usual. And by far the scariest thing about Clinton is that he is a sociopath who has found an acceptable-seeming outlet for his illness in the spectacle of politics, even among ostensibly Republican people like yourself. Clinton IS a bully and has ALWAYS been a sociopath. I have seen and read about his bullying woman scholars because they were NOW type leftists, and challenged parts of Affirmative Action (Abigail Thernstrom) and I have seen him and his Party Hacks/Goons/Hitmen intimidate women like Kathleen Willey and countless others who they thought wanted to talk, or might talk some day. And in his capacity as sicko rapist at around the age of 32, he reminds me of NO world leader, bad as some of them are, in ANY civilized country but either a tinhorn 3rd world dictator, or , more aptly, a young New Jersey man named Alex Kelly, who may still be serving a 16 year prison sentence. You choose to admiringly align yourself with one sick dude, even after the combined efforts of hundreds of truth-tellers over tens of thousands of pages have completely discredited.
"intensity, eloquence, ideological passion...." (from Clinton) in other words, forceful lies, glib-sounding lies, lies wrapped up in highmindedness having nothing to do with reality. I didn't see the entire interview but what I did see was Clinton Business-as-Usual. And by far the scariest thing about Clinton is that he is a sociopath who has found an acceptable-seeming outlet for his illness in the spectacle of politics, even among ostensibly Republican people like yourself. Clinton IS a bully and has ALWAYS been a sociopath. I have seen and read about his bullying woman scholars because they were NOW type leftists, and challenged parts of Affirmative Action (Abigail Thernstrom) and I have seen him and his Party Hacks/Goons/Hitmen intimidate women like Kathleen Willey and countless others who they thought wanted to talk, or might talk some day. And in his capacity as sicko rapist at around the age of 32, he reminds me of NO world leader, bad as some of them are, in ANY civilized country but either a tinhorn 3rd world dictator, or , more aptly, a young New Jersey man named Alex Kelly, who may still be serving a 16 year prison sentence. You choose to admiringly align yourself with one sick dude, even after the combined efforts of hundreds of truth-tellers over tens of thousands of pages have completely discredited.
What Clinton achieved was the final removal of any possible doubts anyone might ever have had that he raped Juanita Broadderick and probabaly several other women as well. There was that one documented in the UK when his "Rhodes" work was summarily ended...
A thug is a thug is a thug is occasionally a rapist, is a thug...
We "fellow right-wingers" can be very direct and to the point, can't we?
You are fooling no one.
CORRECTION: bullying woman scholars because they WEREN'T NOW-type leftists......"
Where have I suggested that Clinton is anything but a rapist and a thug?
I said he performed well in that interview, and fired up the Left.
Honestly, people, I have better luck explaining myself to groups of frothing lefties. I've presented anti-abortion and anti-gay marriage arguments to Vancouver university students, and they don't act like this.
That ain't right, folks. Smarten up.
He DID fire up the party base. The party base is a group of psycho skanks who were always going to vote extremist left.
The moderate, independent bunch of folks--the ones who determine elections OTOH--are quite a different case. I expect US to sweep in November, partially thanks to the scumbag.
I'm delighted to know that you also consider Clinton a rapist and thug as most Americans do.
The sick thing here is that I always get on people's cases for attempting to prove their mettle by bashing Bush and Republicans. It's like some sort of "initiation" into the land of lefty credibility.
Now I see it here and I'm surprised. It's wall-to-wall Clinton bashing. If you dare to praise Clinton in any way, shape of form, you are a heretic.
Coulter writes - correctly - about the religion of liberalism and the hatred that binds lefties together. Now I'm seeing the conservative equivalent here. Shame.
"I'm delighted to know that you also consider Clinton a rapist and thug as most Americans do."
Why are you "delighted"?
Are you only pleased at the prospect of people sharing your common hatreds? Does it make you feel part of a community?
I see Clinton as a flawed, yet extremely gifted human being in need of salvation, like us all. Pray for him; don't curse him.
Ha! This is great stuff!!
<< affect deep masculine voice >>
Keep up the good work Mr. Spinal Transplant President. You are energizing our base!!
Heck, right now I'd like to get out there and vote 2 or 3 times like the Dems in Baltimore and Chicago.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.