Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge Rules There Will Be No Revote [WA, Rossi gov election suit, 'no authority to order revote']
KOMO Radio ^ | Feb 4, 2005 | KOMO Staff & News Services

Posted on 02/04/2005 5:33:17 PM PST by Mike Fieschko

WENATHCEE - A Chelan County judge has refused to order a revote in Washington's achingly close governor's race.

Superior Court Judge John Bridges ruled today that he doesn't have authority under state law to order a statewide, second election, as requested by the Republican Party.

The Republicans are contesting the election of Democrat Christine Gregoire, who was named governor only after winning a second recount of ballots over Republican Dino Rossi. Gregoire won by just 129 votes out of nearly three (m) million ballots cast.

Earlier today, Bridges dismissed all the counties and county auditors from the case.

That simplified the case from 81 parties to four. The remaining parties are the Republicans suing the secretary of state, and the Democrat and Libertarian parties who intervened.

However, Bridges did not dismiss the case, as requested by Democrats.

It's likely headed now for the state Supreme Court.

Republicans hope to go to a trial where they can argue they have uncovered enough problem votes to outweigh Gregoire's 129-vote margin of victory over Rossi.



TOPICS: Breaking News; Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; US: Washington
KEYWORDS: revote; rossi; ruling; themostcorruptstate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-133 next last

1 posted on 02/04/2005 5:33:17 PM PST by Mike Fieschko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Mike Fieschko

This was going to the state Supreme Court regardless of how this judge ruled.


2 posted on 02/04/2005 5:35:00 PM PST by mainepatsfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mike Fieschko

Do I need to ask which side the libertarians are on in this suit?


3 posted on 02/04/2005 5:35:17 PM PST by A Balrog of Morgoth (With fire, sword, and stinging whip I drive the Rats in terror before me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mike Fieschko

So, if R's can't get the relief they are requesting, is the election vacated? Who takes the helm until a new election can be held?


4 posted on 02/04/2005 5:35:34 PM PST by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mike Fieschko

Grip the ankles tightly, grit your teeth and count to ten, in hopes it'll all be over soon.


5 posted on 02/04/2005 5:35:54 PM PST by writer33 (The U.S. Constitution defines a conservative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mike Fieschko

He can void the election and vacate the Gov. seat though.


6 posted on 02/04/2005 5:36:34 PM PST by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anniegetyourgun

Lt. Gov. Owen, a Democrat.

So the result of fraud would still be a theft of power.


7 posted on 02/04/2005 5:37:20 PM PST by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mike Fieschko

Hmm...I understand the argument. The State Supreme Court, however, certainly does have the authority to order a revote. But I am not optimistic.


8 posted on 02/04/2005 5:37:25 PM PST by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mike Fieschko
That simplified the case from 81 parties to four. The remaining parties are the Republicans suing the secretary of state, and the Democrat and Libertarian parties who intervened.

So what exactly is the LP doing in the case?
9 posted on 02/04/2005 5:38:11 PM PST by swilhelm73 (Appeasers believe that if you keep on throwing steaks to a tiger, the tiger will become a vegetarian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mike Fieschko
I realize this is a state issue but if the Republicans do not take the steps to curtail voter fraud while they are in power than they deserve outcomes such as this.

I mean, Gregoire's "victory" is sooooo obviously fraudulent that even Democrats ought to be able to smell the stench.

10 posted on 02/04/2005 5:41:47 PM PST by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Billthedrill

What do you expect to happen, BTD?


11 posted on 02/04/2005 5:42:15 PM PST by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Mike Fieschko

I'm still trying to figure this out. Of the universe of things that could happen... this wasn't among the things I thought were likely.

There is a certain logic to it, but I'm not sure yet that the judge is right about not being able to order a new election.

Even so... Gregoire is not the rightful Governor, and she should be removed. Whether I can live with some months of Brad Owen is another matter. He would at least have the air of legitimacy.


12 posted on 02/04/2005 5:42:56 PM PST by Ramius (Gregoirovich Nyet!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mike Fieschko

I hate to say it, but it sounds like the judge made the right decision: If he indeed didn't have the jurisdiction to order a new election, then to do so would have been the kind of judicial power-grab we despise. Sometimes you have to take the bitter with the sweet.

Also, as other posters said, this one was going to the state SC, period. It's far from over.


13 posted on 02/04/2005 5:45:20 PM PST by Slings and Arrows (Am Yisrael Chai!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: swilhelm73
"So what exactly is the LP doing in this case?"

Waiting to be turned into a CD (Double rimshot.) Seriously, being the annoying little Sore Losetarians that they are, as usual.

14 posted on 02/04/2005 5:46:22 PM PST by WestVirginiaRebel ("Senator, we can have this discussion in any way that you would like.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: swilhelm73
So what exactly is the LP doing in the case?

I don't know. I suspect the GOP added the LP as a defendant in the suit because the only candidates on the ballot were the GOP, Dem and LP. The LP candidate targeted a lot of her effort at getting homosexuals to vote for her.
15 posted on 02/04/2005 5:49:08 PM PST by Mike Fieschko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Slings and Arrows

I agree that the judge made the right move. I don't believe that lower level judges are possessed of sufficient authority to order momentous changes. His ruling seems to be favorable to the Republicans, and stopped short of the revote due to concerns of overstepping bounds. We'll see how this plays out at the WA SC.


16 posted on 02/04/2005 5:49:42 PM PST by Cyclopean Squid (The 80s belonged to the Gipper, the Aughts belong to Dubya!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: A Balrog of Morgoth; Mr. Mojo
Do I need to ask which side the libertarians are on in this suit?

I would hope they are supporting the Republicans, since the RATS have taken over the Senate again. They are planning on bringing up legislation that previously failed when the Republicans had control, like gun control bills.

17 posted on 02/04/2005 5:49:52 PM PST by NRA2BFree (NO AMNESTY, NO UN, NO PC, NO BS, NO MSM, NO WHINY @SS LIBERAL BEDWETTERS, NO LIBERAL JUDGES! YEAH!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: WestVirginiaRebel
Waiting to be turned into a CD (Double rimshot.) Seriously, being the annoying little Sore Losetarians that they are, as usual.

In this case the Libertarian candidate was a flaming feminist lesbian who took way more votes from the Democrat than the Republican. If she had not run, the Democrat would have probably won by 16 or 17 thousand votes and we would not be talking about this today.

Your uninformed shot at Libertarians is uncalled for.

18 posted on 02/04/2005 5:51:40 PM PST by Blue Screen of Death (/i)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Billthedrill

So where is the usual secession legislation that the eastside Republicans try every year? This year it would get some traction.

Let Gregoire govern King, Snohomish, parts of Pierce, and Thurston - and let the rest form a new state. One that is business oriented.


19 posted on 02/04/2005 5:53:26 PM PST by datura (Destroy The UN, the MSM, and China. The rest will fall into line once we get rid of these.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Ramius
There's also this in the Seattle Times:
The good news for Democrats was Bridges' ruling in Chelan County Superior Court that Republicans must show any illegal votes were cast in favor of Gregoire, and not Republican candidate Dino Rossi. There would have to be enough illegal Gregoire votes to erase her 129-vote victory margin.
That's a tough one. How do you discern how people voted? For instance, the 300+ provisional ballots King Co. ran through prematurely...how could Rossi possible determine how they voted? Same question on the voterless ballots---there's no way to assign them by candidate.
20 posted on 02/04/2005 5:55:11 PM PST by Timeout (Dems have been saying no for 10 years. Now they can SCREAM it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-133 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson