Posted on 12/13/2020 11:55:02 AM PST by grey_whiskers
Embrace the flow, says a duo of mechanical engineers at North Carolina State University—the flow of energy, that is. The mantra you might normally hear from your yoga instructor could be an entirely new way of looking at the universe.
🌌The universe is badass. Let's explore it together.
The two theorists, Larry Silverberg and Jeffrey Eischen, suggest that fragments of energy, rather than waves or particles, may be the fundamental building blocks of the universe.
The bedrock of their theory is the foundational idea that energy is always flowing through space and time. The authors suggest thinking of energy as lines that enter and exit a region of space, never crossing each other, and with no beginning or end point.
This content is imported from {embed-name}. You may be able to find the same content in another format, or you may be able to find more information, at their web site.
(Excerpt) Read more at popularmechanics.com ...
“New Theory Casually Upends Space and Time”
Yay! I’m 21 again...but this time with some experience about Life so I can avoid my Ex! ;)
Can you prove it is not BS?
If not, aren’t you doing the same: calling something you can’t refute BS?
In 5-D chess you might've already fallen upward, left 47 degrees, and right out of the game.
God may have to rescue us all once again--at the very last moment--when we're all in unison set to say, "Without God doing what's needed here, it's impossible!"
Do Wisconsin Republicans think he'll argue before SCOTUS and pull it out of the fire this time around?
“New theory. The Universe is an illusion. It doesn’t exist at all. It is only a persception.”
Just spent two hours cleaning garage. The universe exists.
Jim Troupis is awesome, very Conservative and very knowledgeable. If anyone can do it, he can. :)
Jim had his own law practice, specializing in intellectual property and constitutional law. He also practiced law with the firm of Michael Best & Friedrich (huge, successful firm) and served as a law clerk for the Illinois Supreme Court.
*Fingers Crossed*
No. I said as an honest scientist I cannot call it BS. It “could” be true. But it sure sounds like utter BS, which is an aesthetic evaluation. It doesn’t actually solve any problems in the universe we presently have.
Face it, you’re in a computer simulation.
Thank you for the clarification.
bttt
He never does. We’re children, and He gave us tools, or the means to discern the need and develop them, to figure it out - in due time.
That’s the way it’s always been. That’s why the Periodic Table isn’t in the Bible.
>If you want on or off the Electric Universe/Plasma Ping List, Freepmail me.
Can you be both on and off the list?
It is, of course, a Schrödinger’s list. You can’t know if you are on of off of it until you open it and look. . .
In a nutshell, the electrical/plasma driven cosmology holds that the universe is not held together by gravity but by another force that is equally universal also with infinite reach, but which is 39 orders of magnitude stronger than gravity, electromagnetism, and that electricity flows throughout space along vast threads of plasma, the fourth and most common form of matter that makes up 99.9999% of matter in the universe. It also holds that galaxies, galactic clusters, and the stars within those galaxies, all exist along these channels of energy and are in fact draw their power from those flows of energy. Stars are born from these self-same massive flows of energy.
The test for any theory is how well it can predict future discoveries using its precepts. Cosmologists who follow the new paradigm have been capable of making more predictions of what will be found in exploring deep space more accurately than those cosmologists who adhere to the old, gravity cosmology, who are always “shocked, surprised, stunned, and unaware that would be found” at the latest finds, as exposed by the Hubble Space telescope, or other deep space imaging probes, or even what will be found in visiting intra-solar-system comets, planets, or our own sun.
For example, when NASA slammed a 820 pound space probe of copper into Comet Tempel 1 on July 4, 2005 in the Deep Impact Space Probe, what NASA and it’s orthodox cosmologist cometary experts had been describing as a “dirty snowball,” the Electric Universe cosmologists made 19 specific predictions, all of which contrary to the orthodox expectations. All 19 were proved true, including that it would not be a “dirty snowball” but rather indistinguishable from an ordinary, rock like asteroid, have a preliminary flash of electrical discharge prior to striking, find little to water, no ice, have a charge different from surrounding space, etc. They were routinely mocked by the orthodoxy, but the main stream articles on the impact always lead with such statements as “Cosmologists, scientists, astronomers, NASA specialists were (variously) shocked, stunned, surprised, gobsmacked, at-a-loss to explain the findings...” But all nineteen of the electric/plasma universe cosmologist predictions were proved to be the case, and they were not surprised at all. In fact, in every single cometary fly-by, or landing, it has been the EU predictions that have been confirmed, not the Dirty snowball expectations of the orthodoxy.
For example, that expectation that the universe is driven by following Newton’s Laws of Gravity is denied by the observation that when we see every single galaxy’s period of star orbits beyond reaching one-third of the way from the galactic center no longer obey Newton’s laws, orbiting the center at a slower and slower rate in free fall around that center. Instead, every single star beyond that one-third distance from the center begins orbiting at close to the same velocity. Newton is spinning in his grave, but gravity-driven Cosmologists are busy trying to find magical Dark Matter and they Dark Energy which they cannot see, detect, or find, to account for these sudden changes in behavior that do not behave in a gravitic manner.
Orthodox Gravity Cosmologists cannot explain the thousands of Herbig-Haro objects we see throughout the cosmos. These are cohesive jets, streams of plasma, twisting, streaming across hundreds and thousands of light years of distance, retaining their shape and twining about themselves in a double helix pattern, which has no analog in any gravity driven model, but follow exactly an electromagnetic model plasma. They are at a loss to explain how gravity can account for such objects, while the Electric/Plasma cosmologists can show them in the laboratory, and increase their size merely be adding more power.
The Gravity cosmologists have no explanations for objects such as the Ant Nebula or Butterfly nebulas such as the one shown above in the PING I posted which were photographed by the Hubble Space Telescope, with the VERY obvious plasma phenomena, Birkeland current double helix, double layer streaming plasmas, and matching double plasmids on either side of the central Z-pinch plasma... something that can be created in a plasma laboratory right here on Earth in the microcosm, and again, scaled up with more power. But the Math of Plasma physics works all the way up and requires NO Magic Fudge Factors.
Electric/Plasma cosmologists/physicists have made Thunderbolts.info, where I strongly suggest start readying their Thunderbolts Picture of the Day (TPOD) in which an article a day in which either a newest discovery is discussed from the EU viewpoint or some previous science is review from a EU viewpoint. Always interesting.
Can you add me to your Schrödinger’s ping list?
Thanks.
Unfortunately, I don’t maintain a Schrödinger Ping list, it’s just that my three lists I do maintain are so large I don’t have a clue who is on or not on them unless I go and look. The largest, the Apple/Mac/iOS Ping list has almost 900 members. The Electric Universe about 350, and the Shroud of Turin list about 500. . . My old brain only recognizes about fifty names, but I couldn’t tell you what list those names are on. Adding a Schrödinger list and I wouldn’t know if I were dead or alive until I got out of bed.
I think we should have a Schrödinger list, so if you start on, put me as your first listed member. I figure the cat is a zombie.
Thanks for the reply. I was always taught that of the four four forces; gravity, weak, strong, and electromagnetism, gravity was the weakest and least understood. I was also taught we have a lot to learn. Please add me to the EU ping list
The Electric Universe ping list would be great... add me when you can.
Thanks.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.