Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A look back at the Alaskan Way Viaduct as its demise — and the new Highway 99 tunnel — draw near
The Seattle Times ^ | January 7, 2019 | Michelle Baruchman

Posted on 02/25/2019 7:15:25 AM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Seattle’s transportation system will fundamentally change on Jan. 11 when the Alaskan Way Viaduct closes permanently.

For more than 60 years, drivers have skirted downtown while enjoying a scenic, waterfront view of Elliott Bay. But the elevated highway is vulnerable to collapse in an earthquake, so after years of debate, planning and construction, a new Highway 99 tunnel will open in its place.

We’ve reported on all the twists and turns that have led to this point.

Here’s a look back on that coverage.

1911 — 1969: The viaduct gets built

Seattle streets grew more crowded after the turn of the century as cars ownership soared. City engineers, in response, began to look for a route drivers could use to bypass downtown.

In 1911, engineer Virgil Bogue created the first comprehensive plan for the Municipal Plans Commission. He recommended street widening and tunnels to create more space, but Seattle voters rejected his ideas in 1912.

Moving people and freight through Seattle remained a pressing issue. Water flowed daily under the wooden Railroad Avenue, which ran along the waterfront, causing the support columns to weaken and rot.

In 1934, Seattle raised enough money to build a seawall on the central waterfront, according to HistoryLink.org. Behind the seawall, which opened in 1936, the city paved a four-lane road and named it Alaskan Way as a nod to Alaska’s importance to Seattle’s economic development. The new road replaced Railroad Avenue.

Railroad owners and businesses on the waterfront despised the bypass street; they felt the additional traffic would harm shipping and increase the time it took to handle cargo.

(Excerpt) Read more at seattletimes.com ...


TOPICS: History; Local News; Outdoors; Travel
KEYWORDS: construction; infrastructure; safety; transportation

1 posted on 02/25/2019 7:15:25 AM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

So...you could die if the Viaduct falls over?

What is going to happen when the tunnel collapses?

Seem like that just built an expensive way to die horribly vs a scenic way to die horribly....

Be interesting to see what happens in the tunnel when the drunks/tweakers/stoners start playing high speed bumper cars inside.....


2 posted on 02/25/2019 7:20:02 AM PST by ASOC (Having humility really means one is rarely humiliated)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ASOC

Out of the frying pan, into the fire.


3 posted on 02/25/2019 7:25:06 AM PST by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ASOC

they like to spend big $$$$$$$...


4 posted on 02/25/2019 7:26:59 AM PST by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

A tunnel is not at risk in an earthquake? Enlighten me someone.


5 posted on 02/25/2019 7:29:12 AM PST by Don Corleone (Nothing makes the delusional more furious than truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

One reason eastern Washington wants to form it’s own state; paying for the west side’s extravagant roads like this tunnel. Big Bertha was idle for over a year and no mention of what the state was billed on the lease.


6 posted on 02/25/2019 7:39:09 AM PST by Spok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

They closed the Viaduct three weeks before the tunnel opened with limited access; four lanes reduced to two through the tunnel.


7 posted on 02/25/2019 7:42:00 AM PST by SkyDancer ( ~ Just Consider Me A Random Fact Generator ~ Eat Sleep Fly Repeat ~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Don Corleone; Tolerance Sucks Rocks; DuncanWaring; ASOC

I would venture that you are not “safe” either place, but rather “much safer” in such an underground structure.

(In either case ALWAYS be ready to meet your Maker. You will be forever grateful.)

Excerpt:

“...underground structures are safe because they move with the soil, while structures above ground sway back and forth.

Imagine a plate of fruit-filled gelatin dessert. Tunnels are like the pieces of fruit at the base of the gelatin, while above-ground structures are like the fruit toward the top. If you shake the plate, the movement becomes more exaggerated as it flows up from the base of the gelatin. In an earthquake, this translates to tunnel movement measured in inches, while the movement above ground might be measured in feet.

SR 99 tunnel design

Beyond these generally earthquake-resistant traits, the SR 99 tunnel has been specifically designed to withstand a 9.0 magnitude earthquake. This magnitude earthquake only occurs every 2,500 years on average.

(snip)

http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/Projects/Viaduct/Status/Blog/tunnels-and-earthquakes


8 posted on 02/25/2019 8:51:47 AM PST by Repent and Believe (The Son of Man, when He cometh, shall He find, think you, faith on earth? Jesus Christ (Luke 18:8))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: DuncanWaring
Out of the frying pan, into the fire.

If a mega-quake hits Seattle as could happen if the Cascadia plate shifts, I'd rather be in Idaho. However, if I'm on these roads, I'd rather be in the tunnel with modern earthquake mitigation technology than on the viaduct (either upper or lower deck) with 1960's technology.

9 posted on 02/25/2019 9:30:27 AM PST by CommerceComet (Hillary: A unique blend of arrogance, incompetence, and corruption.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: DuncanWaring

What if they built the tunnel and no one would ride in it


10 posted on 02/25/2019 9:41:37 AM PST by Karoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: BobL; sphinx; GreenLanternCorps

PING.


11 posted on 02/25/2019 11:20:31 AM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Modern feminism: ALL MEN BAD!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson