Posted on 10/29/2015 8:20:02 AM PDT by huldah1776
Yes they would..but you realize that they would have to ask really simple questions..otherwise the MSM would NOT understand the questions.
Now you are talking! Question #1 so far.
R. Priebus is holding back ability to participate in given states or something to that effect if you go off the reservation of the debate structure they have created.
The problem of last night wasn't the Moderators, it was the RNC and Priebus giving away the farm.
RNC run debates could be on C-SPAN, Beck's Channel, You-Tube, simul-cast on talk radio etc etc. and tell the BS-BC's to pound sand.
Why doesn’t Trump organize this? It would be huge and it would be a ratings landslide.
Can you please explain when socialism has failed everywhere it's been tried, why the left keeps pushing this failed ideology?
Why do you think the left is so passionate about murdering unborn babies?
Why do you think the left is so intent to take everyones guns away from them?
Why do you think the left thinks it's ok for the government to steal from the people to give to poor when they only want the money stolen from others?
Why do you think these rich leftest that complain that they dont pay enough taxes volunteer to pay more? but instead want to steal it from someone else?
Why do you think the left always wants wind farms and other such non sense only when it's not built in THIER back yards?
ECT ECT!!!
Not practical.
Hannity would never allow an answer without interrupting the candidate.
Hold on now, Levin and Rush would rock the house!!!
Secreatary Clinton
You raised $10s of millions of dollars from fat cat political donors, hedge fund managers and assorted 1% uber wealth doners. Yet you are claiming to be “for the little guy”. Given who is paying for your campaign why should the American voters believe you are anything but yet another corrupt DC insider?
What I heard Hannity say was that he would ask Priebus about it, he may have said something about Murdoch too and I missed it.
I’d love to see it happen...
Carson’s campaign manager is talking about a “revolt” against the current debate structures.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3354255/posts
No it was Priebus. My mistake. I’m horrible with names and should have checked.
Forget Hannity, he doesn’t know when to shut up. Bill Bennett, Michael Medved, Laura Ingraham, or Hugh Hewitt instead. Anyone but that dipstick Hannity.
Trump does not need the RNC approval, does he?
Tell Prebus to shut up, he’s not in control any more
I’d like to see them moderate a democrat debate. Turn about is fair play, right? }:-)
I could hear Levin..... “Jeb Bush from Florida, you have 30 seconds .... GO” “Yewwo Yewwo.... are you there?” “Who cares if he’s there or not.... ahh get out of here. Next we have Crispy Cream Christy from New Jersey.... you have 30 seconds.... GO”
Ingraham? I don’t like her and she has had bad reviews here. haven’t vetted the others.
Makes me think about who I do respect as a woman and that is Sidney Powell who wrote Licensed to Lie. She could get into the corrupt courts. How would they change that if they were President? Then there is Palin who could ask about how they would get rid of the good ol’ boy network.
They can all ask about what is going to change with Ryan as speaker.
What are your top three questions?
Hannity doesn't know the difference between a question and a statement.
First question should be why the hell did we chose Hannity over Laura Ingraham
They should do it, they could conduct it at Rush’s studio with free video streaming access just for the duration of the debate during Levin’s time slot (Best East West Time Frame), don’t know why they would need the RNC’s permission.
ROTFL, yup I can hear it! They would laugh at first, too.
On another note, anyone have any recommendations on the 30 seconds or other format changes?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.