Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rand Paul calls for repeal of drug laws; reaches out to minority voters
Washington Examiner ^ | 10-7-2015 | Jason Russell

Posted on 04/11/2015 9:38:43 AM PDT by Citizen Zed

Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., formally launched his presidential campaign Tuesday with a speech in Louisville. Among the notable quotes from Paul's speech was a comment seemingly meant to raise minority support by calling for reform of federal drug laws that disproportionately lead to incarceration of black Americans.

"I see an America where criminal justice is applied equally and any law that disproportionately incarcerates people of color is repealed," Paul said.

Paul went on to address other topics without expanding much on what kinds of laws he meant. But given his past comments, it's not hard to guess he was talking about the war on drugs. "The war on drugs has become the most racially disparate outcome that you have in the entire country," Paul said in November 2014. "Our prisons are full of black and brown kids. Three-fourths of the people in prison are black or brown."

Lauren Galik, the Director of Criminal Justice Reform at Reason Foundation, said she was excited to hear a Republican presidential candidate campaigning on drug reform. "More than half of our federal prison population right now is there for drugs, many of which are African-American," Galik told the Washington Examiner. "African Americans are more likely to receive a sentence that carries a mandatory minimum term of imprisonment than white individuals."

Mandatory minimums disproportionately affect African American criminals compared to whites and Hispanics. "Although Black offenders in 2012 made up 26.3 percent of drug offenders convicted of an offense carrying a mandatory minimum penalty, they accounted for 35.2 percent of the drug offenders still subject to that mandatory minimum at sentencing," according to the United States Sentencing Commission, an independent federal agency.

(Excerpt) Read more at m.washingtonexaminer.com ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: antimilitary; drugs; paul; randpaul; wod
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-146 next last
To: GeronL
One cannot say this and be a conservative

Once cannot say that and maintain any sense of principle or sense of honest character, period!
41 posted on 04/11/2015 10:45:34 AM PDT by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Ken H; manc
So one can be for legal pot and still be a conservative.

Ken,

If you had actually been paying attention to what Cruz stated on this issue, you would have known that Cruz IS NOT for pot, in fact, he stated he was against it, he also state that constitutionally speaking, it is within the rights of the states to legalize it.

If you are going to post something about someone else, please make sure it is an honest representation.
42 posted on 04/11/2015 10:47:42 AM PDT by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: kingu
Oh, right, libertarians of today don’t believe in personal responsibility and respect of others.

Opposite - it's the War on Drugs that says government must protect people from their own poor choices.

Just out of curiosity, has the drug trade ceased in Colorado and Washington?

Excessive taxes on marijuana have left the black market a foothold - however, "Legal Pot In The U.S. May Be Undercutting Mexican Marijuana": http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3233390/posts

Has petty crime related to the drug trade gone down?

There has been a statistically significant drops in burglary and theft from motor vehicle, and statistically insignificant fluctuations in other crimes: http://www.denvergov.org/Portals/720/documents/statistics/2014/UCR_Citywide_Reported%20_Offenses_2014.pdf

43 posted on 04/11/2015 10:49:52 AM PDT by ConservingFreedom (A government strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie; Ken H

Facts like that won’t stop Ken from saying the same lie over and over.
It’s obvious why he keep doing it too.


44 posted on 04/11/2015 10:50:58 AM PDT by manc (Marriage =1 man + 1 woman,when they say marriage equality then they should support polygamy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
"I see an America where criminal justice is applied equally and any law that disproportionately incarcerates people of color is repealed," Paul said."

One cannot say this and be a conservative

Correct and I never said otherwise, but what's that got to do with what I wrote?

I say one can be for legalizing pot at the federal level, like Ted Cruz, and still be a conservative. Agreed?

45 posted on 04/11/2015 10:53:22 AM PDT by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Patton@Bastogne
TEN generations of Americans worked their asses off ... saved money ... built a nation ... all pretty much in a "no legal drugs" world.

Exactly wrong - for most of those ten generations there were no laws against drugs.

46 posted on 04/11/2015 10:53:33 AM PDT by ConservingFreedom (A government strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Cicero

Yup.

Busted.


47 posted on 04/11/2015 10:55:32 AM PDT by MrEdd (Heck? Geewhiz Cripes, thats the place where people who don't believe in Gosh think they aint going.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Patton@Bastogne
Please take your "childish moonbeam" wishes to legalize pot to another country, and STOP trying to FUBAR the United States of America (where my grandchildren live).

Pot criminalization is failing your grandchildren; teens have been reporting for years that they can get pot more easily than cigarettes or beer - which stands to reason, since only sellers of legal goods have incentive to 'card' buyers.

48 posted on 04/11/2015 10:56:06 AM PDT by ConservingFreedom (A government strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie
If you had actually been paying attention to what Cruz stated on this issue, you would have known that Cruz IS NOT for pot, in fact, he stated he was against it, he also state that constitutionally speaking, it is within the rights of the states to legalize it.

Is he for legalizing pot at the federal level, yes or no?

If you are going to post something about someone else, please make sure it is an honest representation.

You should look in the mirror when you say that.

49 posted on 04/11/2015 10:56:24 AM PDT by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

bump


50 posted on 04/11/2015 10:57:49 AM PDT by GeronL (CLEARLY CRUZ 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: manc
Facts like that won’t stop Ken from saying the same lie over and over.

Same question. Is Cruz for legalizing pot at the federal level, yes or no?

51 posted on 04/11/2015 10:58:00 AM PDT by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Ken H

I do know one can be against it and still be conservative.


52 posted on 04/11/2015 10:58:20 AM PDT by GeronL (CLEARLY CRUZ 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: ConservingFreedom
Pot criminalization is failing your grandchildren;

Wow, that is simply amazing. So, by that logic, we should be giving our kids pot! lol

53 posted on 04/11/2015 10:59:11 AM PDT by GeronL (CLEARLY CRUZ 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
Can one be against states' rights under the Tenth Amendment and still be conservative?
54 posted on 04/11/2015 10:59:48 AM PDT by ConservingFreedom (A government strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: kingu

I’m merely addressing biology. Of course corrupt politicians use them to the damage of all.


55 posted on 04/11/2015 11:01:22 AM PDT by AEMILIUS PAULUS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Ken H; manc
Same question. Is Cruz for legalizing pot at the federal level, yes or no?

No.

And if you think otherwise, post the related link to the story that refutes that.
56 posted on 04/11/2015 11:01:45 AM PDT by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: apoliticalone

His creepy dad toured the talk shows in 1991 claiming that the use of A9 armored bulldozers and tanks with plow attachments to clear trench lines in Desert Storm constituted war crimes. He also had a written statement to that effect in the newsletter he mailed out back then.

Wrong Paul is a guy who will pander to the Code Pink crowd.

It’s not going to be forgotten.

Rand doesn’t appear to have dropped out too far from the bull.


57 posted on 04/11/2015 11:02:11 AM PDT by MrEdd (Heck? Geewhiz Cripes, thats the place where people who don't believe in Gosh think they aint going.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
Pot criminalization is failing your grandchildren; teens have been reporting for years that they can get pot more easily than cigarettes or beer - which stands to reason, since only sellers of legal goods have incentive to 'card' buyers. [underlined text deceptively omitted by GeronL]

So, by that logic, we should be giving our kids pot! lol

No, liar by omission, by that logic those who are genuinely concerned about youth's access to drugs should support policies that minimize that access - which criminalization for adults fails to do.

58 posted on 04/11/2015 11:02:31 AM PDT by ConservingFreedom (A government strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Citizen Zed
any law that disproportionately incarcerates people of color is repealed

Laws against carjacking are obviously on the list. And of course, knock-out game. We've got to legalize the knock-out game like YESTERDAY.

59 posted on 04/11/2015 11:03:24 AM PDT by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: manc

Can’t deny the twit is polling well so far.


60 posted on 04/11/2015 11:04:57 AM PDT by entropy12 (Real function of economists is to make astrologers look respectable.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-146 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson