Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The NRA hints at ‘legislative remedies’ to weaken Initiative 594
blog.seattlepi.com ^ | 11/25/2014 | Joel Connelly

Posted on 11/28/2014 9:29:44 AM PST by rktman

The National Rifle Association is promising supporters it will carry on the fight against Initiative 594, using its “philosophically supportive majority” in the Washington Legislature when it convenes in January.

“We are already discussing legislative remedies to the most onerous provisions,” the NRA said in a letter to supporters. The Gun Lobby’s big gun defends the effort it made in opposing I-594, which requires criminal background checks for those purchasing firearms at gun shows and over the Internet. It blames billionaires the measure’s landslide passage.

“Please bear in mind that, in our fight to defeat I-594, NRA faced unprecedented spending by a handful of billionaires and wealthy elitists, who gave the anti-gun lobby over $10 million to spend in support of I-594,” the NRA’s letter argues.

(Excerpt) Read more at blog.seattlepi.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Conspiracy; Hobbies; Outdoors
KEYWORDS: 2a; banglist; guncontrol; nra; wa
I don't think it's going to be quite as easy as some may think. Notice the bottom of the posters the didiots are holding. "Save Lives/Reduce Crime". Yeah, that'll happen. And when it doesn't, they'll obviously push the "need" to pass more laws that also won't work.
1 posted on 11/28/2014 9:29:44 AM PST by rktman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: rktman
First good news I've heard. I have spoken to various WAC Board members regarding different options. One that I thought interesting was to hold gun shows at an Indian Reservation convention center where most state laws don't automatically apply.
2 posted on 11/28/2014 11:22:58 AM PST by Robert357 (D.Rather "Hoist with his own petard!" www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1223916/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Why can’t this unconstitutional law be challenged in court?


3 posted on 11/28/2014 12:56:24 PM PST by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

I think the way the initiative/referendum process is set up it’s hard to challenge since the voters approved it. Of course that didn’t seem to matter in CA when their votes were overturned by the courts. Looks like FL has an initiative process only for constitutional amendments.


4 posted on 11/28/2014 1:20:55 PM PST by rktman (Served in the Navy to protect "their" rights so they can now try to infringe on mine. Weird huh?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Judges overturn laws voted on by the people all the time regarding gay marriage. Why would this be different?


5 posted on 11/28/2014 6:57:51 PM PST by Red in Blue PA (Compared to obama, Jimmy Carter looks like Winston Churchill.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Red in Blue PA

Uh, guns are dangerous and gays aren’t? They’re not a threat to public health and guns are? I don’t know. Seems ridiculous to me.


6 posted on 11/28/2014 8:50:35 PM PST by rktman (Served in the Navy to protect "their" rights so they can now try to infringe on mine. Weird huh?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson