Posted on 11/01/2013 2:56:29 PM PDT by Houmatt
“Following the public outcry of the Rind study, APA said moral values trumped the scientific study.”
These are the same moral values that didn’t trump their pseudoscientific studies back when they pushed homosexuality.
What a joke, and a sick one at that.
Once you’ve redefined buggery as normal, it’s hard to know where to put the stake in the ground anymore. But the good news is that eventually psychiatrists will redefine themselves right out of business. After all, when nothing’s abnormal, there’s nothing left to treat.
The cure for pedophilia will then be plumbum fulminus — burning lead.
How about Punishable By Death? That has a nice ring to it.
I can describe pedophilia:
“Death Sentence”.
ping
the leftist perverts have an agenda and the rest of the APA are half-crazy themselves
bump!!!!
Especially for the children.
/v/ (vomit tag)
They have already convinced the lawmakers that we no longer have to institutionalize the mentally disturbed we can treat them all at out patient clinic facilicties because WE ALL know they can be trusted to take thier meds. So the walk the street of big cities. These docs are crazier than the people they treat
If they manage tp redefine to sexual orientation, any and all reaction to pedophiles will be illegal.
In DSM-IV, APA changed the criteria, saying that pedophilia was only a disorder if it caused clinically significant distress or impairment in social, occupational or other important areas of functioning.
Call me unsubtle, but it occurs to me that molesting kiddies does constitute "distress or impairment in social functioning." I note, too, the focus of the second definition is on clinically significant distress or impairment in social, etc, functioning on the part of the molester. What it causes in the victim appears not to be considered at all.
There has been a large hue and cry of late in the arbitrariness of pedophilia laws in the case of, say, an 18-year-old prosecuted for having sex with a 17-year-old. By focusing on that sort of case the clinicians blur the distinction between that and a 50-year-old molesting a pre-teen. It isn't even close to the same thing. And if they write their clinical definitions to cover both cases they're kidding themselves and everyone else.
And they almost got away with it but for those meddling kids...
Was the Rind study consucted by homosexual scientists?
May we call it what it really is? Child molestation!
Give them the choice: Death or Unga-Bunga.
;'}
The sex positive agenda seeks to end all moral judgments regarding sexual pairings of any kind regardless of sex, age, relation, marital status, number, or species of partner(s).
They see orgasm as a birthright to be enjoyed at every age.
They are decidedly anti-abstinence not because ‘it doesn’t work’ but because it is counter to their hedonist worldview.
Was the Rind study consucted by homosexual psychiatrists?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.