Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Star Trek Into Darkness Premiered in Sydney…the Truth is Here (SPOILERS)
Furious Fanboys ^ | April 23, 2013 | Jeremy Conrad

Posted on 04/28/2013 12:02:59 PM PDT by EveningStar

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-144 next last
To: GeronL

Actually, the Pon Farr does not impede Vulcans from having normal relations.

Having said that, bringing in Khan like this is a disaster. They couldn’t find a capable Latino or East Indian actor to do this?


21 posted on 04/28/2013 12:24:37 PM PDT by Jonty30 (What Islam and secularism have in common is that they are both death cults)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

Wow.

THanks

You saved three hours of my time. I thot the reboot (first move) was well done. Won’t waste my time on this pig. Seriously, has hollywood had a new idea in decades?


22 posted on 04/28/2013 12:25:25 PM PDT by ASOC (What are you doing now that Mexico has become OUR Chechnya?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Norm Lenhart

Fan boys love spoilers. It’s part of the culture now to know the movie before you see it.


23 posted on 04/28/2013 12:25:48 PM PDT by Jonty30 (What Islam and secularism have in common is that they are both death cults)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

I knew the guy was Harry Mudd.


24 posted on 04/28/2013 12:26:02 PM PDT by Sybeck1 (What has the GOP done today to gain your support in 2014?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jonty30

He saved old trek fans money and good memories. I thank him.


25 posted on 04/28/2013 12:27:32 PM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

This must be a hoax. No one is going to fund a $250M reboot this horrible.


26 posted on 04/28/2013 12:32:22 PM PDT by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

A lot of the Trek movies have been awful.


27 posted on 04/28/2013 12:33:23 PM PDT by GeronL (http://asspos.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

Ah. Shows how well I’ve been following trek. Lol.


28 posted on 04/28/2013 12:37:17 PM PDT by Hardraade (http://junipersec.wordpress.com (Vendetta))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

No, the Battlestars Galactica and Pegasus both appear and rescue the Enterprise from a Drazi death cruisers.


29 posted on 04/28/2013 12:45:34 PM PDT by GreyFriar (Spearhead - 3rd Armored Division 75-78 & 83-87)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

The PC-ness of gay loving, political agenda driven Hollywood is enough to gag a maggot. I’ll wait till this drek comes on TV.

Of coarse the young indoctrinated minds will eat this stuff up...on Dads dollar.


30 posted on 04/28/2013 12:49:13 PM PDT by exPBRrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

This will kill Star Trek forever. It died pathetically, like a broken man with dementia pumped full of pain killers.

Next up will be abrams killing Star Wars.


31 posted on 04/28/2013 12:50:08 PM PDT by Kirkwood (Zombie Hunter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

Unfortunately, yes, they will. Including my wife.

Who won’t take me because I truly hated the reboot and she claims I spoiled it for her. I even tried to force my imagination to consider it solely as its own entity without any relationship to other Trek stuff. STILL hated it; maybe even hated it more.

For most people seeing this, I suspect this is not a “reboot” any more tan the Buck Rogers in the 25th Century TV show was a reboot of the Buck Rogers serials. To these youngsters, it IS Trek. So, yes, it will make its money.


32 posted on 04/28/2013 12:51:22 PM PDT by Little Ray (How did I end up in this hand-basket, and why is it getting so hot?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: GrandJediMasterYoda

I give him about thirty minutes - after all he is a red shirt.


33 posted on 04/28/2013 12:55:22 PM PDT by reg45 (Barack 0bama: Implementing class warfare by having no class.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

This movie will make Spaceballs look like serious sci-fi.


34 posted on 04/28/2013 12:57:45 PM PDT by matt1234 (The NRA: Redefining "Too big to fail.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GreyFriar

and the cliffhanger happens when the Yamato shows up!


35 posted on 04/28/2013 12:57:47 PM PDT by GeronL (http://asspos.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: GreyFriar

36 posted on 04/28/2013 12:59:02 PM PDT by GeronL (http://asspos.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

or an Imperial Death Star.


37 posted on 04/28/2013 1:01:42 PM PDT by GreyFriar (Spearhead - 3rd Armored Division 75-78 & 83-87)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

That image needs tons of lens flare and heavy use of blue filter.


38 posted on 04/28/2013 1:02:16 PM PDT by Army Air Corps (Four Fried Chickens and a Coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Army Air Corps

lol


39 posted on 04/28/2013 1:08:31 PM PDT by GeronL (http://asspos.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
I guess they had to demolish Vulcn culture in that reboot.

Hell, they had to demolish Vulcans in that reboot. They are now an "endangered species".

I had to laugh at this person when he seemed to be upset that they had completely redone the "Wrath of Khan" movie with a different ending. Star Trek lore and mythology means nothing to Abrams, he is re-booting the series and making it his own. He is not interested in redoing what Gene Roddenberry had envisioned; he is making Star Trek his own, and that means changing things around.

Now, I don't think Wrath of Khan needed any re-doing -- it is, by far, the best Trek film. But, I don't have any say in this, so thats, that. I'm not sure I want to go to this one, though; partly because I liked the original Wrath of Khan so much I don't want that spoiled.

40 posted on 04/28/2013 1:19:19 PM PDT by LibertarianLiz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-144 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson