Skip to comments.Star Trek Into Darkness Premiered in Sydney…the Truth is Here (SPOILERS)
Posted on 04/28/2013 12:02:59 PM PDT by EveningStar
I am going to preface this that if you do not want to know the truth about Star Trek Into Darkness and who Benedict Cumberbatch is really playing, you should not be reading this.
(Excerpt) Read more at furiousfanboys.com ...
The whole Trek reboot was horrible
I cannot fathom this level of stupid. I just can’t.
Live Long and Prosper and may The Force Be with you, Klaatu
What do you mean?
Wow,I can’t believe Kirk marries a tribble. Didn’t see that one coming.
+Ig the movie really is what that article ‘spoiled’ it is the single most stupid thing I can imagine being done to Trek. Seriously. Total blasphemy.
Hey, last time they made Spock Uhura’s lover, even though he is supposed to only mate once every 7 years. I guess they had to demolish Vulcn culture in that reboot.
Ther was sort of precedence there from TOS with the hippie thing. But THIS????
I have no idea what they were thinking, does the Battlestar Galactica show up and attack the Enterprise in the next film?
DeathStar as Vger: Electric Boogaloo 2 - The Vrngance!
The good thing is, we KNOW that Kirk & Co. survive, since this movie features the young version of the basic crew and we know we've seen 'em as older people. I really didn't like Eric Bana's villain in the first JJAbrams Star Trek movie, although I really enjoyed the rest of the movie, e.g. Kirk's boyhood and Spock's origins. I could have lived quite nicely without the cameo appearance of Leonard Nimoy in that film as well. Dumb.
Pine, Quint, Cho et al are quite refreshing as younger versions of the crew and I look forward to seeing the Darkness Star Trek movie. We have a bargain matinee theater within walking distance. If I don't like the movie, the world won't end.
Spock is male and Uhura is female
The actor who plays Spock is a real-life homo. I’ll probably wait until someone uploads this on torrent.
Actually, the Pon Farr does not impede Vulcans from having normal relations.
Having said that, bringing in Khan like this is a disaster. They couldn’t find a capable Latino or East Indian actor to do this?
You saved three hours of my time. I thot the reboot (first move) was well done. Won’t waste my time on this pig. Seriously, has hollywood had a new idea in decades?
Fan boys love spoilers. It’s part of the culture now to know the movie before you see it.
I knew the guy was Harry Mudd.
He saved old trek fans money and good memories. I thank him.
This must be a hoax. No one is going to fund a $250M reboot this horrible.
A lot of the Trek movies have been awful.
Ah. Shows how well I’ve been following trek. Lol.
No, the Battlestars Galactica and Pegasus both appear and rescue the Enterprise from a Drazi death cruisers.
The PC-ness of gay loving, political agenda driven Hollywood is enough to gag a maggot. I’ll wait till this drek comes on TV.
Of coarse the young indoctrinated minds will eat this stuff up...on Dads dollar.
This will kill Star Trek forever. It died pathetically, like a broken man with dementia pumped full of pain killers.
Next up will be abrams killing Star Wars.
Unfortunately, yes, they will. Including my wife.
Who won’t take me because I truly hated the reboot and she claims I spoiled it for her. I even tried to force my imagination to consider it solely as its own entity without any relationship to other Trek stuff. STILL hated it; maybe even hated it more.
For most people seeing this, I suspect this is not a “reboot” any more tan the Buck Rogers in the 25th Century TV show was a reboot of the Buck Rogers serials. To these youngsters, it IS Trek. So, yes, it will make its money.
I give him about thirty minutes - after all he is a red shirt.
This movie will make Spaceballs look like serious sci-fi.
and the cliffhanger happens when the Yamato shows up!
or an Imperial Death Star.
That image needs tons of lens flare and heavy use of blue filter.
Hell, they had to demolish Vulcans in that reboot. They are now an "endangered species".
I had to laugh at this person when he seemed to be upset that they had completely redone the "Wrath of Khan" movie with a different ending. Star Trek lore and mythology means nothing to Abrams, he is re-booting the series and making it his own. He is not interested in redoing what Gene Roddenberry had envisioned; he is making Star Trek his own, and that means changing things around.
Now, I don't think Wrath of Khan needed any re-doing -- it is, by far, the best Trek film. But, I don't have any say in this, so thats, that. I'm not sure I want to go to this one, though; partly because I liked the original Wrath of Khan so much I don't want that spoiled.
You know, they could have simply done a “Kirk and the Gang - The Early Years” without the alternate timeline twaddle. However, as you noted, that would have prevented Lensflare Abrams from crapifying it with his particular genius. Heck, they could have gone so far as exploring a different aspect of the Trek Universe they way that DS9 and Voyager did, but that would not have allowed Captain Blue Filter to leave his stain, er, mark on established characters.
Oh yea, Planet Vuclan was wiped out... lol
Vulcan “went boom” in this alternate timeline? Sheesh. Why not just do a film set in the “Mirror Universe”, as you suggested?
It was the honorable thing to do after he got her in tribble..
Now you’re talkin’! Captain Okita at the ready!
After seven years, Mr. Sulu is looking forward to his turn........
LOL! Great post!
The only positive comment I have about the new Star Trek movies is that some of the cast members are cute.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.