Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Yes he will.
1 posted on 11/09/2012 7:22:00 PM PST by MeneMeneTekelUpharsin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin
He would have to get a constitutional amendment passed.
2 posted on 11/09/2012 7:23:45 PM PST by fortheDeclaration (Pr 14:34 Righteousness exalteth a nation:but sin is a reproach to any people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin
It's not a "law." It's a constitutional amendment (the 22nd Amendment).

Even if they wanted to do this, I find it hard to believe that they'd be willing to spend the time and effort to get the amendment changed. Heck -- even a lot of Democrats with political aspirations would be dead-set against this.

3 posted on 11/09/2012 7:25:42 PM PST by Alberta's Child ("If you touch my junk, I'm gonna have you arrested.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin

Won’t this require an amendment to the Constitution? I just can’t see enough senators or governors that would touch this. I can’t see the populace putting up with such a move.


4 posted on 11/09/2012 7:26:02 PM PST by Ax ("Bring the Pipes together for the Risin' o' the Moon.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin

why not?

They already figured out how to rig the elections


5 posted on 11/09/2012 7:26:11 PM PST by GeronL (http://asspos.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin
Really? Well, I will be glad to shoot the first sonovabitch who approaches me with a mandate to let the Usurper become President for Life.
6 posted on 11/09/2012 7:26:21 PM PST by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin

That is not just a law to be repealed, it’s the 22nd Ammendment.


8 posted on 11/09/2012 7:28:06 PM PST by 5thGenTexan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin

2/3 of House, 2/3 of Senate, and 3/4ths of the State Legislatures would need to agree to this by Constitutional amendment.

Maybe a totally packed Supreme Court could convince everyone that the 22nd Amendment was null and void because of umbras and penumbras and references to Scottish Law but I doubt it.

If you look up the bill histories of each Congress, you’ll see that frequently this is proposed right off. Lieberman D-Ct proposed such an amendment right after he got through defending Billy Clinton.


12 posted on 11/09/2012 7:31:09 PM PST by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin

I would live to be a fly on the Clinton’s wall if he tries.


13 posted on 11/09/2012 7:31:50 PM PST by MNDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin

Michelle obama has already said it. She mentioned their “first 10 years” in office in 2008. I haven’t been able to find record of it, but I’ve never forgotten it.


20 posted on 11/09/2012 7:36:00 PM PST by taraytarah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin

Big problem with your prediction...

By the time a law, or better yet, a constitutional amendment gets passed to allow a president to run for more than 2 terms, the next election season will be upon us, and chances are that, a republican could get elected instead of Obama, and the democrats would be having all kinds of regrets after having that amendment passed which could get a republican installed in the presidency for for 20 years or more.

Can anyone doubt that, someone like Reagan couldn’t get elected for 20 or 30 years? That would be the biggest nightmare for any democrat. They’d be looking for repeal of the law or the amendment, as soon as any republican got elected and was deemed electable for a lengthy period of time.

So, my prediction: Ain’t gonna happen!


24 posted on 11/09/2012 7:37:46 PM PST by adorno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin

http://d2.yimg.com/sr/img/1/108a2602-0c39-300b-8a5e-fabda58eed50


25 posted on 11/09/2012 7:39:41 PM PST by TornadoAlley3 (Obama is everything Oklahoma is not.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin

I said it many times ,Obama is staying for life ,then it gets turned over to the wife or the kids


26 posted on 11/09/2012 7:40:14 PM PST by molson209
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin

You may be the first to predict it here, but I read Porter Stansberry say it a week or more before the election and I have been suggesting this to friends ever since.

I’d say odds are 90% he’ll go for it.

I asked one Freeper whose views I share but who didn’t vote for Romney because he was too liberal, “What if you’d known in advance that O was going to seize power for 12 years? Would you have voted for Romney?” He said yes.

Many who didn’t vote for Romney may end up regretting it, I am quite certain of that.

Put your seatbelts on, friends.

And draw close to God....the shaking is just beginning......


39 posted on 11/09/2012 7:54:28 PM PST by Arlis (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin

In regard to all the posts here about how O can’t pull this off, the 22nd Amendment, etc......

Obama is the lawless one. He is above and beyond law, law does not apply to him or anything he wants to do. How many times has he already demonstrated this?

He will find a way.


48 posted on 11/09/2012 8:02:22 PM PST by Arlis (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin

I believe it was one of Clinton’s flunkies that said something like, “Just like that !! Stroke of the pen, law of the land!” He was refering to a just signed Exec. Order, which happens to be Obama’s favorite means of enacting public policy. Clinton was Obama Lite in this regard, seldom subjecting his new public policy desires to the messy legislaltive debate and vote process.


52 posted on 11/09/2012 8:19:45 PM PST by Elsiejay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin

He will over reach to the point that his own base will turn, also he will be impeached causing a civil war. The branches will refuse to follow the presidents orders and the communist that we were told infiltrated us years ago are rounded up and shipped to Iran and Cuba. Except for the real traitors who will be lined up against the piece of the Iron Curtain in Illinois and shot.


54 posted on 11/09/2012 8:29:23 PM PST by longfellow (Bill Maher, the 21st hijacker.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin
I’ve been making the same claim on the AOL message boards for the past two years. Oblamer believes that if Hugo Chavez could do it, so can he.
Will and Executive Order be enough?
58 posted on 11/09/2012 8:47:20 PM PST by Doc91678 (Doc91678)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin

It requires a Constitutional Amendment, approval by 2/3 of the House and senate and ratification by 3/4 of the states. No way is this going to happen.


59 posted on 11/09/2012 8:52:16 PM PST by anoldafvet (One million people attended Obama's inauguration, at least 14 of them missed work)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin

You’re a couple years late - folks on FR have been predicting it evre since parts of the Obama Care atrocity was “deemed to have been passed” and when it was also clear about the folks he was surrounding himself with.


77 posted on 11/10/2012 5:45:21 AM PST by trebb (Allies no longer trust us. Enemies no longer fear us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson