Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The South is rising again
OneNewsNow/Perspectives ^ | 3/15/2010 | Peter Heck

Posted on 03/15/2010 10:08:18 AM PDT by bubbacluck

The South is rising again. Before I go any further, let me clarify. Sadly, too many in our country possess the superficial and ignorant perception that the only impetus behind southern secession was to perpetuate the abhorrent practice of slavery. Therefore, when they hear such a phrase, their kneejerk reaction tells them this must be about race. I assure you, it’s not.

When the North invaded the South during the 1860s, it was to deny the southern states the ultimate expression of their sovereignty – the ability to withdraw from a union they had voluntarily joined.

(Excerpt) Read more at onenewsnow.com ...


TOPICS: History
KEYWORDS: donttreadonme; freedom; liberty; revisionistnonsense; secession; south; sovereignty; statesrights; teaparty
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-153 next last
Those who fail to remember the past....you know the drill. This is a concise history that I believe is relevant to today.
1 posted on 03/15/2010 10:08:18 AM PDT by bubbacluck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: liege
New England states had contemplated using themselves in the 1804 Hartford Convention when they felt the national government had become too oppressive.

Actually 1814. During the War of 1812. It destroyed the Federalist Party.

2 posted on 03/15/2010 10:11:48 AM PDT by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: liege
Nevertheless, Lincoln’s views on government were clearly expressed in his famous “House Divided” speech when he articulated to the south that he would not allow different states to take different sides on different issues. We would, “become all one thing, or all the other.”

This is a possibly unintentional misstatement of what Lincoln said in his speech.

At the time Lincoln and a great many other Free Soil men believed there was a conspiracy among southerners, using the power of the federal government, to force slavery on the rest of the states. There was some evidence at the time and since to support this position. That is what he was concerned about.

Lincoln himself at the time of this speech and up to the Emancipation Proclamation recognized the federal government as having no power to interfere with slavery within a state. He even recognized this in the EP, as it affected only areas in rebellion against the Union.

3 posted on 03/15/2010 10:18:20 AM PDT by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: liege

If the south would’ve won, we’d have it made.


4 posted on 03/15/2010 10:23:21 AM PDT by Leader_Of_The _Conservatives (Palin rules....Odumbo drools)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: liege

If you haven’t, you should, read “The Grey Book.” It offers insight into freedom for the individual.


5 posted on 03/15/2010 10:25:38 AM PDT by Neoliberalnot ((Read "The Grey Book" for an alternative to corruption in DC))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Leader_Of_The _Conservatives

Depends on your color, of course.
How many slaves would you own?


6 posted on 03/15/2010 10:25:50 AM PDT by IrishCatholic (No local Communist or Socialist Party Chapter? Join the Democrats, it's the same thing!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: liege

Well-written article; thank you for posting it.


7 posted on 03/15/2010 10:26:40 AM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: liege
One should not overlook the impact of the Scots-Irish on the South's disdain for centralized government. With a long history of rebellion against English Kings the Scots-Irish were not about to sign up for a new dictator. There is a reason the Cross of Saint Andrew is emblazoned on the Confederate battle flag. I won't go into whisky making, moonshining and NASCAR here but that lineage seems to be at least part of the cultural kickback going on now. The South shall rise again, indeed.
8 posted on 03/15/2010 10:27:54 AM PDT by dblshot (Insanity - electing the same people over and over and expecting different results.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Leader_Of_The _Conservatives
Actually, I think Divine intervention ensured a North Victory. If the south had won, this area of the world would probably be like Europe. I think we would have had a LOT more wars as well.

But the increase in the size of the federal government brought with it problems of its own.

9 posted on 03/15/2010 10:30:27 AM PDT by RobRoy (The US today: Revelation 18:4)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: liege

I love this book.

The Politically Incorrect Guide to The South

http://www.thepoliticallyincorrectguidetothesouth.com/

The Biggest Myths About the South

The South is unsophisticated compared to the North and West Coast. The truth is Southerners invented musical forms like rock and roll, jazz, blues and bluegrass. We created the motion picture industry. The first women’s colleges and the oldest public universities were all started here.

The South is “rural redneck.” The nation’s largest banks and the world’s largest corporation are based here. The first successful black politicians on the national stage were Southerners. The first two Jewish U.S. Senators were Southerners. The most popular destination for people of all races to move to is The South and away from The North.

Southerners supported slavery while Northerners hated it. No Southern alive today disputes that slavery was morally wrong, but the fact remains that all Northern states once had slaves, and virtually all of the slave ships were owned by Yankees. Profits from the slave trade stayed in the North.

Southerners tried to break up the Union. It was New England which invented the idea of secession; first in objection to the Louisiana Purchase in 1803 doubling the nation’s land area, and then in 1814 when New England wanted to trade with enemy England during the War of 1812.

The War For Southern Independence was about “slavery.” While the South foolishly defended slavery in early 1860s rhetoric, The War was really fought over power and money. If Northerners had a moral objection to slavery in the 19th century, why did they finance the slave trade in the 18th century?

The Confederate battle flag symbolizes slavery. The battle flag, designed to resemble the cross favored by Jesus’ disciple St. Andrew, as well as the ancient flag of Scotland, did not fly over any slave ships. It flew over the Confederate ancestors of at least 30 million Southerners who fought, bled, and died defending their homes from invading Union armies.

The Confederate flag is used by the Klan. The largest march ever staged by the Klan was in 1925 Washington, D.C. Thousands of American flags were carried, but not a single Confederate flag. The Klan, when it does march, still carries the U.S. flag.


10 posted on 03/15/2010 10:31:31 AM PDT by NavyCanDo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IrishCatholic

That was a Hank Williams Jr song


11 posted on 03/15/2010 10:33:36 AM PDT by Raider Sam (They're on our left, right, front, and back. They aint gettin away this time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: liege; All

I love my southern brothers but this revionist history is crap. The LEADERSHIP of the South forced a civil war. The SCOTUS decision to open the Territories to slavery guaranteed war.

The first shot was fired by the South at Fort Sumter.

And don’t forge that there is a God in Heaven. The grievous sin of slavery needed attonement.


12 posted on 03/15/2010 10:34:49 AM PDT by rae4palin (islam is of the devil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dblshot

The South shall rise again, indeed.””

And the blueprint for it can be found in this book—
“The Grey Book.” You won’t find a better read.


13 posted on 03/15/2010 10:43:17 AM PDT by Neoliberalnot ((Read "The Grey Book" for an alternative to corruption in DC))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: IrishCatholic

>Depends on your color, of course.
>How many slaves would you own?

What about slave-holders who were, themselves, black?

See:
http://www.uwec.edu/Geography/Ivogeler/w188/south/charles/charles3.htm
http://americancivilwar.com/authors/black_slaveowners.htm
http://www.blackinformant.com/uncategorized/more-buried-history-black-slave-owners-in-the-us


14 posted on 03/15/2010 10:44:30 AM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: dblshot

“One should not overlook the impact of the Scots-Irish on the South’s disdain for centralized government.”

Sounds like you have also read. “Born Fighting: How the Scots-Irish Shaped America” Great Book!!!

Follows the path of my own family line very closely, which went from a direct line of Robert the Bruce to the Grapes of Wrath migration West.


15 posted on 03/15/2010 10:44:31 AM PDT by NavyCanDo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: rae4palin

The North started the war by trying to resupply a Fort in southern land. They baited the south into it.

The war was based on tax collection. Lincoln actually never cared about slavery and he wanted to send slaves back to Africa or their country of orgin. Lincoln was a tyrant

Be careful, winners write the history books


16 posted on 03/15/2010 10:46:08 AM PDT by Leader_Of_The _Conservatives (Palin rules....Odumbo drools)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: liege

A house divided cannot stand.

It’s rather silly, when the country is in danger, to go back to the civil war. The South did not win. We ‘are’ one country. The best country on the planet. It’s useless speculation that solves nothing and sounds a bit whiney.


17 posted on 03/15/2010 10:47:34 AM PDT by ReneeLynn (Socialism is SO yesterday. Fascism, it*s the new black. Mmm Mmm Mmm.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Raider Sam

Great song


18 posted on 03/15/2010 10:47:40 AM PDT by Leader_Of_The _Conservatives (Palin rules....Odumbo drools)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: liege
All legally binding accords are “freely entered into”, that in no way implies that they can be unilaterally withdrawn from at any time.

I used to say “If the South would have won, it would be a third world nation right now.”

My father said “Have you seen Arkansas? It looks like and is run as a third world country.”

19 posted on 03/15/2010 10:48:07 AM PDT by allmendream (Income is EARNED not distributed. So how could it be re-distributed?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OneWingedShark

Same question then, how many would they own?


20 posted on 03/15/2010 10:49:42 AM PDT by IrishCatholic (No local Communist or Socialist Party Chapter? Join the Democrats, it's the same thing!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-153 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson