Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Blade Runner at 25 (Mythbusters' Adam Savage/Popular Mechanics)
Popular Mechanics ^ | June 2007 | Adam Savage

Posted on 06/25/2007 1:01:41 PM PDT by af_vet_rr

Twenty-five years ago, the Ridley Scott film Blade Runner became an instant science fiction classic. Set in a sodden, squalid Los Angeles of 2019, the neo-noir masterpiece influenced a generation of filmmakers and video-game designers. Long before I teamed up with Jamie Hyneman to form the MythBusters, I was a special-effects modelmaker, and Scott's cyberpunk gem almost instantly became the most important film in the canon of movies I love.

I'm still such a big Blade Runner fan that I watch it at least once every 18 months. I also own pretty convincing replicas of the "blade runner blaster" wielded by Harrison Ford's world-weary former cop Rick Deckard. The source material was a Steyr Mannlicher .222 target rifle magazine cover, with a Bulldog .44 carriage underneath. I can't get enough of this prop. Now, I want a working one.

In Blade Runner's dystopian near future, replicants, or genetically engineered humanoids, do the hard work on off-world colonies. After a bloody mutiny, the androids are forbidden from coming to Earth — on pain of death. So when six rogue replicants return home, they must be "retired" — hunted down and killed — and Ford's Deckard, once a top replicant hunter, or "blade runner," is pulled out of his own retirement to do the job.

I worked on Star Wars Episodes I and II, on the Matrix films, on AI and Terminator 3; yet 25 years later there are ways in which Blade Runner surpasses anything that's been done since. Watching the theatrical release DVD at home with PM reminded me of Scott's genius for creating stunning effects with simple technology.

(Excerpt) Read more at popularmechanics.com ...


TOPICS: Arts/Photography; History; Science; TV/Movies
KEYWORDS: androids; bladerunner; electricsheep; mythbustersisbs; philipkdick; ridleyscott; scifi
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
Interesting commentary about the special effects behind it.

I didn't realize that the blaster was modeled on real parts.
1 posted on 06/25/2007 1:01:44 PM PDT by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: af_vet_rr; Tijeras_Slim
TTIUWP:


2 posted on 06/25/2007 1:03:58 PM PDT by martin_fierro (< |:)~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_rr

I purchased the directors cut a few years ago... it has some scenes that make it a lot more clear that Deckard is a replicant himself.


3 posted on 06/25/2007 1:06:36 PM PDT by Rodney King (No, we can't all just get along.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_rr

Cool read.


4 posted on 06/25/2007 1:07:05 PM PDT by SIDENET (Inventor of the 12-hour "power nap".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro; Lazamataz
It was a prototype for this:


5 posted on 06/25/2007 1:07:12 PM PDT by Joe 6-pack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_rr; martin_fierro

Very cool.


6 posted on 06/25/2007 1:07:43 PM PDT by Tijeras_Slim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_rr

Rrrowr.

7 posted on 06/25/2007 1:07:49 PM PDT by martin_fierro (I've done ... questionable things.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_rr

8 posted on 06/25/2007 1:17:23 PM PDT by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rodney King
I purchased the directors cut a few years ago... it has some scenes that make it a lot more clear that Deckard is a replicant himself.

Reportedly, this causes some contention between Ford and Scott. Scott says that Deckard was a replicant and Ford says no, he isn't.

I think that ambiguity is one of the reasons for the film's endurance.

9 posted on 06/25/2007 1:20:35 PM PDT by highball ("I never should have switched from scotch to martinis." -- the last words of Humphrey Bogart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: highball
Reportedly, this causes some contention between Ford and Scott. Scott says that Deckard was a replicant and Ford says no, he isn't. I think that ambiguity is one of the reasons for the film's endurance.

Right.. in the directors cut there is a scene where Deckard is staring at the photos in his apartment and it is clear that he does not seem to know them.

10 posted on 06/25/2007 1:27:15 PM PDT by Rodney King (No, we can't all just get along.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_rr; Tijeras_Slim
It's the year 2007. Where are all the flying cars? There were supposed to be flying cars! Why? Why? WHY?


Toyota FINE-S concept car

11 posted on 06/25/2007 1:28:53 PM PDT by martin_fierro (< |:)~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: highball

“Does he dream of electric sheep?” that is the question to ask.


12 posted on 06/25/2007 1:35:28 PM PDT by NonValueAdded (Brian J. Marotta, 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub, (1948-2007) Rest In Peace, our FRiend)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_rr

bump


13 posted on 06/25/2007 1:36:45 PM PDT by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_rr

Ridley Scott is also behind the CBS TV show “Numbers” and occasionally has his characters make references to BladeRunner.


14 posted on 06/25/2007 1:55:53 PM PDT by ikka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasCajun

Seriously.


15 posted on 06/25/2007 1:58:08 PM PDT by Vision ("Blessed is the man who trusts in the Lord, whose confidence is in him." Jeremiah 17:7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: NonValueAdded
“Does he dream of electric sheep?” that is the question to ask.

I don't know, but from the article it's clear he can't "remember it for you wholesale." 

16 posted on 06/25/2007 3:35:19 PM PDT by Phsstpok (Often wrong, but never in doubt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro

That’s it, I figured it was just something that they machined or molded and threw a grip on it. I wonder what it’d be like to fire such a contraption..


17 posted on 06/25/2007 4:26:36 PM PDT by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_rr

I suspect that “Blade Runner” was the first theatrical release in which
the term “reverse transcriptase” was uttered.


18 posted on 06/25/2007 4:31:58 PM PDT by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Deckard — Blade Runner, B26354.

Yes, I have watched it waaay too many times.


19 posted on 06/25/2007 9:50:51 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Time heals all wounds, particularly when they're not yours. Profile updated June 23, 2007.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro
Where are all the flying cars?

How should I know, I just do eyes.


20 posted on 06/26/2007 7:25:41 AM PDT by Tijeras_Slim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson