Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A Two-Time Universe? Physicist Explores How Second Dimension of Time Could Unify Physics Laws
PhysOrg ^ | May 15, 2007 | Tom Siegfried

Posted on 05/20/2007 8:59:57 PM PDT by SunkenCiv

For a long time, Itzhak Bars has been studying time.. Einstein's theory of gravity and quantum theory don't fit together. Some piece is missing in the picture puzzle of physical reality. Bars thinks one of the missing pieces is a hidden dimension of time... With two times, Bars believes, many of the mysteries of today's laws of physics may disappear. Of course, it's not as simple as that. An extra dimension of time is not enough. You also need an additional dimension of space... Other dimensions could exist, however, if they were curled up in little balls, too tiny to notice. If you moved through one of those dimensions, you'd get back to where you started so fast you'd never realize that you had moved... Something as tiny as a subatomic particle, though, might detect the presence of extra dimensions... Adopting the more symmetric two-time approach may help. Describing the 11 dimensions of M theory in the language of two-time physics would require adding one time dimension plus one space dimension, giving nature 11 space and two time dimensions. "The two-time version of M theory would have a total of 13 dimensions," Bars said.

(Excerpt) Read more at physorg.com ...


TOPICS: Astronomy; Science
KEYWORDS: stringtheory
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last
USC College theoretical physicist Itzhak Bars has pioneered efforts to discern how a second dimension of time could help physicists better explain the laws of nature. Photo credit: Don Milici

A Two-Time Universe? Physicist Explores How Second Dimension of Time Could Unify Physics Laws

1 posted on 05/20/2007 9:00:04 PM PDT by SunkenCiv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; bvw; callisto; ckilmer; dandelion; FairOpinion; ganeshpuri89; gobucks; KevinDavis; ...

2 posted on 05/20/2007 9:00:53 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Time heals all wounds, particularly when they're not yours. Profile updated May 18, 2007.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

And to think that the puzzle came about all by itself. Yeah, right.


3 posted on 05/20/2007 9:05:02 PM PDT by 353FMG (Liberalism is a satanic cult.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

So that’s what the two timer looks like.


4 posted on 05/20/2007 9:05:58 PM PDT by GoLightly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv; Alamo-Girl; betty boop

Interesting.

Seems to this layman . . . given that there clearly IS SOME sort of time in Heaven per the Heavenly visitors who’ve returned to tell about conditions there . . .

that is . . . things do not ALL HAPPEN AT ONCE. There is SOME sort of linearity of a time sort . . .

Yet Heaven’s time is clearly NOT OURS. Evidently ‘days’ spent there can equal minutes here or some such.

Perhaps the fellow is discerning some keen reality.


5 posted on 05/20/2007 9:19:49 PM PDT by Quix (GOD ALONE IS GOD; WORTHY; PAID THE PRICE; IS COMING AGAIN; KNOWS ALL; IS LOVING; IS ALTOGETHER GOOD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Quix; betty boop
Thanks for the ping!

Cumrun Vafa and P.S. Wesson have led the way on multiple temporal dimensions. In Vafa's as in the one above, it is an extension of the Kaluza/Klein compactified model. In Wesson's the extra dimension (5 dimensions, 2 time) is expanded, i.e. a higher dimension.

The Creator's perspective - uncaused cause of space/time/physical causality etc. - is timelessness and spacelessness.

6 posted on 05/20/2007 9:32:19 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

OK, that’s 2 articles in a row I’ve bumped. Please put me on this string theory list.


7 posted on 05/20/2007 9:32:47 PM PDT by Kevmo (Duncan Hunter just needs one Rudy G Campaign Video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RVBtPIrEleM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

It’s another ‘gaseous Vulcan’.

M-theory isn’t even well-defined, being instead a vague collection of proposed patches to string theory that still hasn’t produced a testable prediction (or, maybe has—in which case it’s been proved wrong since we don’t observe the ‘dilaton’), so now Bars proposes to patch M-theory (whatever that is) with a second temporal dimension.

More cynically, M-theory is a way for string theorists to keep sopping up all the grant money, even though their theory has failed for 40 years to produced any actual progress, rather than allowing funding to be diverted to any of the radically different approaches like Connes’ recovery of the Standard Model from noncommutative geometry, or the more algebraic approached to quantum gravity of folks like Barrett, Crane, Isham, Rovelli or Smolin.


8 posted on 05/20/2007 9:35:11 PM PDT by The_Reader_David (And when they behead your own people in the wars which are to come, then you will know. . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Quix
The Eckwards and the Andwards, of course.

(C.S. Lewis reference...)

9 posted on 05/20/2007 9:52:23 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: The_Reader_David
Connes’ recovery of the Standard Model from noncommutative geometry,

Links, please?

Cheers!

10 posted on 05/20/2007 9:53:37 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers

OODNESS DREDGES UP MEMORIES.

THX


11 posted on 05/20/2007 9:53:38 PM PDT by Quix (GOD ALONE IS GOD; WORTHY; PAID THE PRICE; IS COMING AGAIN; KNOWS ALL; IS LOVING; IS ALTOGETHER GOOD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: snarks_when_bored
Like, *PING*, dude!

Cheers!

12 posted on 05/20/2007 9:54:00 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

That’s a pretty unique Blackboard...mst be some warp in the time dimension....


13 posted on 05/20/2007 10:03:20 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (The DemonicRATS believe ....that the best decisions are always made after the fact.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

The second dimension of time, similar to extra physical dimensions, is very tiny and possibly rolled up and hidden. In terms of duration, the second dimension of time is the interval between the traffic light turning green and the guy behind you hitting his horn. Intervals this small are very hard to measure, which is why we only conceive of the one time dimension.


14 posted on 05/20/2007 10:03:53 PM PDT by gcruse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv
With two times...many of the mysteries of today's laws of physics may disappear.

Many of the principles of logic would disappear also.

It may not be my place to say this, since I'm not a physicist, but stuff like this can only come from an overeducated pinhead...

15 posted on 05/20/2007 10:18:45 PM PDT by csense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

BTTT.


16 posted on 05/20/2007 10:48:24 PM PDT by TBP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

Interesting read. Thanks for the ping!


17 posted on 05/21/2007 6:41:55 AM PDT by texas booster (Join FreeRepublic's Folding@Home team (Team # 36120) Cure Alzheimer's!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

Interesting but.. I can’t help think that, to expound on my analogy of String Theory further, they have simply decided to start using their left hand, backwards..


18 posted on 05/21/2007 8:10:36 AM PDT by Paradox (In the final analysis, its mostly a team sport, Principles cast off like yesterdays free agents.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: csense

With planar time causality goes away. Cosmologists know this and it has been around a long time unless time is planar in which case it’s hard to say.


19 posted on 05/21/2007 8:16:09 AM PDT by RightWhale (Repeal the Treaty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

The premise of this thread and most of the comments make my head hurt.


20 posted on 05/21/2007 8:35:27 AM PDT by oldsalt (There's no such thing as a free lunch.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson