Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

President-elect Donald Trump has big plans for the Second Amendment
Newsy via AOL ^ | Nov 14th 2016 | STEPHANIE LIEBERGEN

Posted on 11/14/2016 8:36:56 PM PST by Mr. Mojo

Donald Trump has made a lot of campaign promises — and one of those promises involves guns.

Trump certainly toes the Republican Party line in supporting the Second Amendment and the right to bear arms.

On his campaign website, the president-elect says he wants to defend the rights of "law-abiding gun owners" by eliminating gun and magazine bans, fixing the background check system instead of expanding it and instituting a national right to carry.

The 2016 Republican Party platform calls for "firearm reciprocity legislation to recognize the right of law-abiding Americans to carry firearms to protect themselves and their families in all 50 states."

Trump's support of a national right to carry has some gun control advocates concerned. Currently, each state sets its own rules on whether a concealed-carry permit from another state is valid within its borders.

On his campaign website, the president-elect says he wants to defend the rights of "law-abiding gun owners" by eliminating gun and magazine bans, fixing the background check system instead of expanding it and instituting a national right to carry.

SEE MORE: How Many Guns Slip Through Background Check Loopholes?

The 2016 Republican Party platform calls for "firearm reciprocity legislation to recognize the right of law-abiding Americans to carry firearms to protect themselves and their families in all 50 states."

Trump's support of a national right to carry has some gun control advocates concerned.

(Excerpt) Read more at aol.com ...


TOPICS: Politics
KEYWORDS: 2a; banglist; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

1 posted on 11/14/2016 8:36:56 PM PST by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo

I need the ability to shop pawn shops nation wide.


2 posted on 11/14/2016 8:44:10 PM PST by Paladin2 (No spellcheck. It's too much work to undo the auto wrong word substitution on mobile devices.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo
Trump's support of a national right to carry has some gun control advocates concerned.

What, apart from an outright repeal of the 2nd Amendment, DOESN'T have "gun control advocates" concerned?

You know what concerns me? The animals rioting in the streets because government power *might* be slightly reduced in the next 4 years.

3 posted on 11/14/2016 8:45:04 PM PST by Sicon ("All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others." - G. Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo

States never have the “Right” to abridge or censor any of our Natural Rights from God which are unalienable. That includes freedom of speech and thought and association which are all abridged and censored now. This is unconstitutional and our Natural Rights from God have to be restored now if we are to have a Constitutional Republic again.

Obscenity is never a natural right-—nor any vice. Justice Systems only promote “public virtue” (as in Christian Ethics only since Christianity is the most rational religion in the history of man. Just Law is based on Right Reason according to Natural Law (which is a Christian concept of Free Will and Individualism which comes from Natural Law/God’s Laws.

All “Law” which is antithetical to the Constitution (our Supreme Law of the Land) is “null and void” (Justice Marshall/Nuremberg Trials/MLK, Jr.).

Good for President-Elect Trump and true freedom.


4 posted on 11/14/2016 8:50:23 PM PST by savagesusie (When Law ceases to be Just, it ceases to be Law. (Thomas A./Founders/John Marshall)/Nuremberg)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blue Jays

National Right To Carry would be wonderful, especially in view of the unpredictable and violent anti-America protesters.

5 posted on 11/14/2016 8:58:56 PM PST by Blue Jays ( Rock hard ~ Ride free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo

He had me at “national right to carry”.


6 posted on 11/14/2016 9:00:28 PM PST by comebacknewt (Newt (sigh) what could have been . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo
Trump thinks BIG


7 posted on 11/14/2016 9:01:38 PM PST by bigbob (We have better coverage than Verizon - Can You Hear Us Now?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo

We could really use some help out here in CA.


8 posted on 11/14/2016 9:11:13 PM PST by umgud (ban all infidelaphobics)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo

Hey Mr Prez! How about you send the feds after ammo
thief CA Lt Gov Gavin Newsom and his law which is
an assault on 2A? Yah, we’ll cool our heels until
Feb ‘17.


9 posted on 11/14/2016 9:15:27 PM PST by Sivad (NorCal red turf.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo

Will a license still be required to pack heat?


10 posted on 11/14/2016 9:20:14 PM PST by 353FMG (AMERICA IS ALL THAT MATTERS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo

Will a license still be required to pack heat?


11 posted on 11/14/2016 9:22:27 PM PST by 353FMG (AMERICA IS ALL THAT MATTERS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo

*Trump’s support of a national right to carry has some gun control advocates concerned.*

GOOD!


12 posted on 11/14/2016 9:25:58 PM PST by Daffynition (*Donald Trump represents the WILL of the PEOPLE.*~ Don King 09.24.16)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 353FMG

11 states plus Puerto Rico allow constitutional carry.
I, for one, being all for it, but being raised around
lethal weapons, have a healthy respect the damage they can
inflict. Someone not familiar would benefit with a firearms training course. But I believe a license to carry should
not be required. A criminal, intent on harming someone who
he doesn’t know is packing or not...deserves what the outcome
may be. A person, upon first greeting, should always assume
that person is armed. (the cops do).
I hoping Trump sides with these 11 states. I apologize for the format..
posted from Cel phone...


13 posted on 11/14/2016 10:49:40 PM PST by Lean-Right (Eat More Moose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo

Gun control advocates can move to the nation of their choice, if they will feel safer there.

This is America, the land of the Free and Brave.

We have the Second Amendment, and it means something.

IF they want to keep screwing with it, just tell them you’ll listen when they start whittling away at the amendments that grant Blacks equal treatment.

Of course we don’t want that, but it’s a great way to drive home the fact that the 2nd Amendment is just as sacred as any other amendment, and they need to step back and stop this nonsense.


14 posted on 11/14/2016 11:07:55 PM PST by DoughtyOne (The morning and the evening were the election day. People voted. The Lord saw, and it was good.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo

Unnecessary. The Constitution has a “Full Faith and Credit” clause. States that don’t rcognise a carry permit are in violation of the Constitution, and a reformed Supreme Court will strike their “laws” down.


15 posted on 11/14/2016 11:58:47 PM PST by John Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo
I think Trump's Second Amendment Coalition is going to mean great things for our firearm rights.

https://www.donaldjtrump.com/press-releases/donald-j.-trump-announces-second-amendment-coalition

He's named a coalition of about 60 people to advise him on Second Amendment issues, headed up by Donald Jr. and the NRA's Chris Cox. The coalition consists of a lot of heavy hitters such as NRA board members & former board members, people like Ronnie Barrett, hunters, competitive shooters.

These people will have his ear in a major way.
16 posted on 11/15/2016 4:49:51 AM PST by sonjay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sonjay

Many thanks for that info!!!

We are soooooo fortunate blessed and lucky that he won.

M.A.G.A. !!


17 posted on 11/15/2016 4:56:45 AM PST by WildHighlander57 ((WildHighlander57, returning after lurking since 2000)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo

I’m hoping he takes a look at the NFA-68. At minimum the tax and paperwork for suppressors and like items. Removing the restrictions on Full auto firearms would be a dream.


18 posted on 11/15/2016 4:58:19 AM PST by BigpapaBo (If it don't kill you it'll make you _________!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Locke; All
---yep---I have never been able to get a clear explanation as to why this clause applies to some activities and not others---

--( and it is not why drivers licenses are accepted between states--that is a result of the drivers license compact to which all states subscribe)

19 posted on 11/15/2016 5:25:51 AM PST by rellimpank (--don't believe anything the media or government says about firearms or explosives--)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: 353FMG
Will a license still be required to pack heat?

Sounds like an infringement to me. The 2nd amendment is clear about this being a right to keep and *bear* arms.

A visibly armed society, contrary to hollywood depictions, is a polite society. Criminals are on notice and it effects their behavior. In contrast criminals prefer gun-free zones and conduct their reprehensible mass shootings in such locales -- schools, malls, theatres, etc.

Criminal organizations always restrict the carrying of weapons to their own minions. That's contrary to the 2nd Amendment whose prohibitions of infringement of RKBA are NOT restricted to the general government.

20 posted on 11/15/2016 5:30:33 AM PST by nonsporting
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson