Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

President-elect Donald Trump has big plans for the Second Amendment
Newsy via AOL ^ | Nov 14th 2016 | STEPHANIE LIEBERGEN

Posted on 11/14/2016 8:36:56 PM PST by Mr. Mojo

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last
To: John Locke
Unnecessary. The Constitution has a “Full Faith and Credit” clause.

The reality is that enabling federal legislation is often necessary. It serves as notice to law enforcement and lower courts.

21 posted on 11/15/2016 5:35:01 AM PST by nonsporting
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: bigbob

Best bumper sticker ever!!!


22 posted on 11/15/2016 6:22:13 AM PST by Magnum44 (My comprehensive terrorism plan: Hunt them down and kill them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: umgud

More democrats = less freedom.


23 posted on 11/15/2016 6:33:38 AM PST by glasseye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: glasseye

That is why I’ll vote for an anti-gun repubbie instead of a pro-gun dim.

It is the dim majority that takes away 2A rights. I wont add to a dim majority.

CA and and a handful of other states have dim majorities and our only relief is thru the feds and SCOTUS.


24 posted on 11/15/2016 6:40:52 AM PST by umgud (ban all infidelaphobics)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

I think it’s fine we can only buy guns in our state of residence. I mean, we can only buy books, read the news, attend church or give speeches in our home state, right?


25 posted on 11/15/2016 6:46:49 AM PST by barefoot_hiker (Any)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: barefoot_hiker

What do itinerant people do?


26 posted on 11/15/2016 7:55:28 AM PST by Paladin2 (No spellcheck. It's too much work to undo the auto wrong word substitution on mobile devices.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo
...he wants to defend the rights of "law-abiding gun owners"...

Nowhere in the second amendment are gun rights restricted to the law-abiding. He who should not be trusted to be armed should not be free.

And here in New Jersey if I purchase or carry a weapon without government permission, I am no longer a law-abiding citizen. What do they find confusing about "shall not be infringed"?

27 posted on 11/15/2016 10:42:38 AM PST by JimRed (Is it 1776 yet? TERM LIMITS, now and forever! Build the Wall, NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
We have the Second Amendment, and it means something.

Without it the others are unenforceable.

28 posted on 11/15/2016 10:44:25 AM PST by JimRed (Is it 1776 yet? TERM LIMITS, now and forever! Build the Wall, NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: JimRed

I agree.


29 posted on 11/15/2016 1:14:43 PM PST by DoughtyOne (The morning and the evening were the election day. People voted. The Lord saw, and it was good.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson