Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The doctored call log of Deborah Palfrey

Posted on 04/02/2016 7:34:53 AM PDT by Claud

Folks, that Deborah Palfrey call log that's floating around. Have you had a good look at the fonts on that? It's obviously been doctored. My question is...by whom....and why?

Let's open this up for discussion, and give it the classic FR Buckhead treatment.


TOPICS: Conspiracy; Government; Politics; Society
KEYWORDS: cruzbot; deborahpalfrey; prostitution; vanity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

1 posted on 04/02/2016 7:34:53 AM PDT by Claud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Claud

Viewable in all its doctored glory here:

https://themarshallreport.wordpress.com/2016/04/01/cruz-why-is-your-number-on-the-list-of-d-c-madam/


2 posted on 04/02/2016 7:36:05 AM PDT by Claud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Claud

It has been online for years, this week, someone calling themselves “Anonymous,” posted it again, probably doctored, but the info has been online for years. What people are waiting for is the 815 names and SS numbers, which the lawyer says may or may not be released.


3 posted on 04/02/2016 7:37:57 AM PDT by PghBaldy (12/14 - 930am -rampage begins... 12/15 - 1030am - Obama's advance team scouts photo-op locations.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot; tired&retired; nikos1121; Buckhead; Antoninus

Pinging the skeptics


4 posted on 04/02/2016 7:38:46 AM PDT by Claud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Claud; bushpilot2

Thanks for the info, Claudia

Ping to bushpilot2


5 posted on 04/02/2016 7:39:45 AM PDT by WildHighlander57 ((WildHighlander57, returning after lurking since 2000)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Claud

Claudia s/b Claud


6 posted on 04/02/2016 7:40:35 AM PDT by WildHighlander57 ((WildHighlander57, returning after lurking since 2000)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: PghBaldy

It’s definitely doctored. This “Anonymous” completely sucks as a forger.


7 posted on 04/02/2016 7:41:13 AM PDT by Claud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Claud

Doctored, schmocktored.

This page has been online since 2007 and has nothing to do with the UNRELEASED records that the DC Madam lawyer is trying to get permission to release which he says could impact the election.

You’re barking up the wrong tree. Just wait and see what materializes in the next couple of weeks. This ain’t it.


8 posted on 04/02/2016 7:43:37 AM PDT by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Claud

Doctored, schmocktored.

This page has been online since 2007 and has nothing to do with the UNRELEASED records that the DC Madam lawyer is trying to get permission to release which he says could impact the election.

You’re barking up the wrong tree. Just wait and see what materializes in the next couple of weeks. This ain’t it.


9 posted on 04/02/2016 7:43:37 AM PDT by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Claud

Well, it did come from Lucy Ramirez, so it’s gotta be authentic. Crazy bastard Bill Burkett did a better forgery.

It’s an obvious and crude forgery, that will only convince those already convinced.

Obama’s birth certificate is more credible than this.


10 posted on 04/02/2016 7:45:50 AM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (The Democratic Party strongly supports full Civil Rights for Necro-Americans!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PghBaldy

Releasing all the names won’t bring Jeannie back.
She didn’t release the names while she was alive even though it might have made her safe because there were clients she didn’t want to see hurt.

In my opinion, even though her clients may deserve for all this to be made public, and even though the list would probably be politically damaging to people who I despise, this should just be let go.

Unless they can actually tie anyone on it to her death, and to the death of the coroner. Then I am all in.

Sometimes it just isn’t the right thing to dig through some sources of information


11 posted on 04/02/2016 7:46:56 AM PDT by MrEdd (Heck? Geewhiz Cripes, thats the place where people who don't believe in Gosh think they aint going.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: bigbob

What has been online since 2007? The original 266-page undoctored PDF, or this single doctored page?

And before everyone starts getting a bee in their bonnet about Trump v. Cruz, I am supporting *neither* of them. Whatever comes out or doesn’t come out in the next few weeks...fine. I don’t give a rat’s rear.

I care about people on FR and elsewhere posting forged docs.


12 posted on 04/02/2016 7:47:55 AM PDT by Claud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Lonesome in Massachussets

Who is Lucy Ramirez? Do you have an original source on where it came from?

I missed the whole provenance/release of this doc. I just started seeing it on FR and didn’t want people to be duped by it.


13 posted on 04/02/2016 7:51:36 AM PDT by Claud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Claud

What is floating around was released by a hacked hack called anonymous
Not what the lawyer says will be released tomorrow via multiple servers on a timed dump

Anonymous may be trying to,muddy the issue
Hard to tell wh is really “ anonymous” and who is faked anonymous

The real anonymous seems to be a nihilist aimed at taking them all down including Trump when the time is right

The fake anonymous seems to be batting for Cruz while trying to look like a crusader


14 posted on 04/02/2016 7:51:57 AM PDT by silverleaf (Age takes a toll: Please have exact change)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Claud

Dear Claud
Me too. Also.
Except I am leaning toward None of the Above. He just might be the best option this year. In both the primaries and general.


15 posted on 04/02/2016 7:52:27 AM PDT by Tupelo (we vote - THEY decide.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Lonesome in Massachussets

Oh never mind, I get it now LOL


16 posted on 04/02/2016 7:53:50 AM PDT by Claud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: silverleaf

That helps, thanks.


17 posted on 04/02/2016 7:56:32 AM PDT by Claud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Claud
We should call an expert:


18 posted on 04/02/2016 7:57:00 AM PDT by Pollster1 (Somebody who agrees with me 80% of the time is a friend and ally, not a 20% traitor. - Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Claud

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Killian_documents_controversy#CBS_states_that_use_of_the_documents_was_a_mistake


19 posted on 04/02/2016 8:00:49 AM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (The Democratic Party strongly supports full Civil Rights for Necro-Americans!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Claud

Just google deborah j palfrey 202-258-7248

Name and number from that posted phone record.

Plenty of results come up, I found nothing whatsoever that would implicate Cruz. I am sure it implicates other people, and I am not willing to link to that mess here.

Google for yourself if you want to know..


20 posted on 04/02/2016 8:01:57 AM PDT by justlittleoleme
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson