Doctored, schmocktored.
This page has been online since 2007 and has nothing to do with the UNRELEASED records that the DC Madam lawyer is trying to get permission to release which he says could impact the election.
You’re barking up the wrong tree. Just wait and see what materializes in the next couple of weeks. This ain’t it.
What has been online since 2007? The original 266-page undoctored PDF, or this single doctored page?
And before everyone starts getting a bee in their bonnet about Trump v. Cruz, I am supporting *neither* of them. Whatever comes out or doesn’t come out in the next few weeks...fine. I don’t give a rat’s rear.
I care about people on FR and elsewhere posting forged docs.
I’m betting on the Enquirer. They run celebrity affairs every week, yet they rarely tackle politicians unless they have something substantial in hand. Once they sink their teeth into you, the Enquirer does not let go if there is any there-there. They are journalistic pitbulls. And if Cruz stepped out of the race, the story continues. They want to sell magazines, not win political races. Case in point: John Edwards:
Edwards’ scandal story made the headlines of the Enquirer in 2007 and continued for nearly three years. Edward’s affair was given little attention outside the tabloid press and political blogosphere. John lied and denied the affair for about 8 months. He denied getting Hunter pregnant and his child another two years.
August 2008 on ABC News. Edwards admits his affair with Hunter, but denied he fathered Hunter’s daughter. Hunter’s sister claimed that Edwards had lied and publicly asked Edwards to take a paternity test. In 2010, Edwards admitted that he was the father of the Reilly’s child after the existence of an explicit sex tape, featuring Edwards and Hunter, was publicly reported.
How do you know when a lawyer is lying.....
And funny how it took DNA to confirm the truth for both Clinton & Edwards.