Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Amazon’s Jeff Bezos Confirms Salvaged Engine is from Apollo 11
Legal Insurrection ^ | 7-19-2013 | Mandy Nagy

Posted on 07/19/2013 4:13:18 PM PDT by servo1969

Bear with me, LI readers – I’m a little bit of a geek, so I find stories like these exciting. It might not be of interest to everyone, but I do think there’s one point about it that will resonate with all of you.

Amazon founder Jeff Bezos started Bezos Expeditions (as well as the space exploration venture Blue Origin) out of his “passions for science, engineering, and exploration.”

Bezos, like so many others, watched Apollo 11′s launch from his television as a child in 1969. Days prior, the mission began when five F-1 rocket engines fired together in a test by NASA, then landed in the ocean after passing that test successfully.

The Amazon founder pondered, “A year or so ago, I started to wonder, with the right team of undersea pros, could we find and potentially recover the F-1 engines that started mankind’s mission to the moon?”

In short, the answer is YES!

Bezos posted an update to his website today, announcing that one of the components his expedition team scooped from the ocean’s depths – they collected enough to “fashion displays of two flown F-1 engines” – has been confirmed as that of Apollo 11′s F-1 engine #5.

Today, I’m thrilled to share some exciting news. One of the conservators who was scanning the objects with a black light and a special lens filter has made a breakthrough discovery – “2044” – stenciled in black paint on the side of one of the massive thrust chambers. 2044 is the Rocketdyne serial number that correlates to NASA number 6044, which is the serial number for F-1 Engine #5 from Apollo 11. The intrepid conservator kept digging for more evidence, and after removing more corrosion at the base of the same thrust chamber, he found it – “Unit No 2044″ – stamped into the metal surface.

44 years ago tomorrow Neil Armstrong stepped onto the moon, and now we have recovered a critical technological marvel that made it all possible. Huge kudos to the conservation team at the Kansas Cosmosphere and Space Center in Hutchinson, Kansas. Conservation is painstaking work that requires remarkable levels of patience and attention to detail, and these guys have both.

The discovery is a reminder of one of America’s most shining moments in the history of the world, when man walked on the moon.

And it comes at just the right time, as Bezos points out above.

From NBC News:

The age of the moonwalkers began on July 20, 1969, when Armstrong and crewmate Buzz Aldrin took humanity’s first small steps on the lunar surface. Since then, four of the 12 men who walked on the moon have passed away. The youngest of those who remain — Apollo 16′s Charlie Duke — is 77.

I can’t even fathom the excitement that Bezos and his team are feeling today. They’ve apparently discovered a piece of great American history. Congratulations to them.


TOPICS: Arts/Photography; Astronomy; Business/Economy; Conspiracy; Government; History; Military/Veterans; Science; Travel
KEYWORDS: 11; aldrin; amazon; apollo; armstrong; blueorigin; booster; buzz; buzzaldrin; engine; jeffbezos; moon; neil; neilarmstrong; salvage; spaceexploration; walk
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last
Jul 19, 2013

SERIAL NUMBER 2044

http://www.bezosexpeditions.com/updates.html


Blacklight w/filter


Recovered

1 posted on 07/19/2013 4:13:18 PM PDT by servo1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

ping


2 posted on 07/19/2013 4:23:16 PM PDT by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

/mark


3 posted on 07/19/2013 4:24:12 PM PDT by KoRn (Department of Homeland Security, Certified - "Right Wing Extremist")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

Great post, thanks.


4 posted on 07/19/2013 4:39:25 PM PDT by Rappini (Veritas vos Liberabit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: colorado tanker

If memory serves those five F-1s were very thirsty, They burned fifteen tons of propellants per second, developing seven and a half million pounds of thrust, one hundred sixty million horsepower. I can’t comprehend why they didn’t collapse under all that pressure. In fact, the entire Apollo program still impresses me. Also impressive is the fact that all twelve men who walked on the moon were Americans.


5 posted on 07/19/2013 4:46:41 PM PDT by donaldo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: donaldo
all twelve men who walked on the moon were Americans.

White males, I hope you're showing the appropriate guilt over this stunning lack of diversity.....

6 posted on 07/19/2013 4:48:47 PM PDT by nascarnation (Baraq's economic policy: trickle up poverty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

It’s one of these very engines.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4cOhZy7dhTo


7 posted on 07/19/2013 4:54:54 PM PDT by donaldo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: donaldo

That Saturn V was an amazing machine. You’re right, the numbers are mindboggling. The Sov’s gave up trying to build anything that powerful.


8 posted on 07/19/2013 4:56:09 PM PDT by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: servo1969
From the Wikipedia:

The F-1 burned 3,945 pounds (1,789 kg) of liquid oxygen and 1,738 pounds (788 kg) of RP-1 each second, generating 1,500,000 pounds-force (6.7 MN) of thrust. This equated to a flow rate of 413.5 US gallons (1,565 l) of LOX and 257.9 US gallons (976 l) RP-1 per second. During their two and a half minutes of operation, the five F-1s propelled the Saturn V vehicle to a height of 42 miles (68 km) and a speed of 6,164 miles per hour (9,920 km/h). The combined propellant flow rate of the five F-1s in the Saturn V was 3,357 US gallons (12,710 l) per second.[5] Each F-1 engine had more thrust than three Space Shuttle Main Engines combined.[6]

9 posted on 07/19/2013 4:57:33 PM PDT by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: donaldo

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4cOhZy7dhTo


10 posted on 07/19/2013 5:02:16 PM PDT by donaldo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: cynwoody

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F-1_(rocket_engine)


11 posted on 07/19/2013 5:04:11 PM PDT by donaldo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: nascarnation

hey, star trek got us out of white guilt about space.


12 posted on 07/19/2013 5:15:37 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: servo1969
I've been on an Apollo kick myself for the last week or so. Watching everything I could on YouTube from that time. Here's the video that got me started.

That was such a wonderful time for me, as an American teenager (the summer between eighth and ninth grade). Listening to these conversations brings so much of it back.

One thing I noticed: the hum. In all the audio recordings of Apollo-Houston conversations, there's a deep, ever-present hum that's not quite at the limit of audibility.

What struck me is that you would never hear that hum today; the reason is because all communications channels - including voice - would be digital in our time. Back then, they were analog. When you remember that it was often the case that Earth-crew communications were carried out via a huge dish antenna located somewhere other than in the continental US (I believe one such station was located in Woomera Australia) it is all the more amazing. Analog transmissions, over thousands of terrestrial miles. With so little hum.

This was more than a decade before NASA's TDRSS (digital) satellite system was put in orbit.

13 posted on 07/19/2013 5:22:07 PM PDT by Steely Tom (If the Constitution can be a living document, I guess a corporation can be a person.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servo1969
Badass!

PLEASE put this on display.

I'd love to see it.

At one time, man decided to see just how far their reach could extend. And they stepped on the moon.

14 posted on 07/19/2013 5:55:06 PM PDT by boop ("You don't look so bad, here's another")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: donaldo
If memory serves those five F-1s were very thirsty, They burned fifteen tons of propellants per second, developing seven and a half million pounds of thrust, one hundred sixty million horsepower. I can’t comprehend why they didn’t collapse under all that pressure.

Because they were actually just five second stage J-2 engines in an identical configuration, just with big nozzles.

After all, the thing only had to get to orbit.

15 posted on 07/19/2013 6:16:02 PM PDT by Talisker (One who commands, must obey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: donaldo
Rocketdyne turbopump for Saturn V F-1 engine. Turbine, fuel pump and oxidizer pump all on a single shaft. Engine bearings cooled by fuel. Oxidizer pump: 24,811 gpm. Fuel pump: 15,741 gpm. Turbine generated 55,000 brake horsepower. Turbine inlet gas was 1,500F; Oxidizer pump inlet -300F. Mass flow to turbine: 170 lb/sec. Fuel pressure at injector face: 1,150 psi.


16 posted on 07/19/2013 9:02:55 PM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: colorado tanker; KoRn; brytlea; cripplecreek; decimon; bigheadfred; Grammy; married21; ...

Thanks colorado tanker and KoRn, *another* extra to APoD members.


17 posted on 07/19/2013 9:07:14 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (McCain or Romney would have been worse, if you're a dumb ass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: donaldo
Been years since I read about it, but they had problems feeding the fuel smoothly to the engine. Needed some sort of diffusing spray or such. What they ended up with was the size of a manhole cover with lots of holes punched in it.

Mind boggling. Rockedyne used to have a dummy sitting out front of their San Fernando plant in the seventies.

18 posted on 07/19/2013 9:14:27 PM PDT by doorgunner69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: donaldo
My Strengths of Materials Professor in college was the structural engineer team leader on the stage 1 of Saturn 5. He would never actually admit it but we ran the numbers and yes it is a great feat that the engines never tore the thing apart.
19 posted on 07/19/2013 9:18:53 PM PDT by mad_as_he$$
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: cynwoody
"Each F-1 engine had more thrust than three Space Shuttle Main Engines combined."

As the saying goes: There is the money quote...........

20 posted on 07/19/2013 10:08:20 PM PDT by doorgunner69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson