Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

DOJ to Crack Down on Excessive Criticism of Muslims
Semi-News/Semi-Satire ^ | 31 May 2013 | John Semmens

Posted on 05/31/2013 9:18:23 PM PDT by John Semmens

Bill Killian, the US Attorney for the Eastern district of Tennessee, says that social media comments critical of Islam that the Department of Justice deems “excessive” will be subject to “enforcement action.”

“We understand that some people may be frightened or angry over what they see as unwarranted acts of terror or other violence carried out by persons alleged to be motivated by radical religious views,” Killian said. “However, it is our position that two wrongs don’t make a right.”

“Fighting for the faith and slaying unbelievers is a religious obligation for Muslims,” Killian argued. “Verbal attacks on these beliefs and behaviors illegally denigrate the religious freedoms of Muslims. Just as our Constitution protects the Christians’ right to ‘turn the other cheek’ it also must protect the Muslims’ right to wage holy jihad. To the extent that Muslims are inhibited by hate speech targeting this right we will intervene.”

As for freedom of speech, Killian pointed out that “protecting the free exercise of religion takes precedence over abridging freedom of speech under the First Amendment. Speech that has the effect of suppressing the free exercise of a Muslim’s religion will not be tolerated by this Administration.”

The initial enforcement action is expected to be DOJ assistance in suits in which aggrieved Muslims seek financial compensation for “mental anguish” or “personal humiliation” they may suffer as a result of intemperate criticisms posted in public forums like Facebook and Twitter.

In related news, Senator Dick Durbin (D-Ill) questioned whether non-journalists are entitled to post their opinions on blog or twitter forums. “Journalists are trained to be objective,” Durbin contended. “Ordinary citizens are not. I think if we limited posting rights to this identifiable and more narrowly confined group we would eliminate a lot of our problems with unauthorized and unsanctioned expression. The news would be more controlled and less hysterical and subversive.”

if you missed any of this week's other semi-news/semi-satire posts you can find them at...

http://azconservative.org/2013/06/01/doj-to-crack-down-on-excessive-criticism-of-muslims/


TOPICS: Government; Military/Veterans; Politics; Religion
KEYWORDS: freespeech; muslims; satire; tyranny
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-59 next last

1 posted on 05/31/2013 9:18:24 PM PDT by John Semmens
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: #1CTYankee; 12Gauge687; 14erClimb; 21twelve; 2nd Bn, 11th Mar; 2ndDivisionVet; 3D-JOY; 43north; ...

ping


2 posted on 05/31/2013 9:19:21 PM PDT by John Semmens
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Semmens
doesn't matter what happens, the goathumpers are safety wired to the terrorist/murderous thug position anyway so fill in the blank...

3 posted on 05/31/2013 9:22:19 PM PDT by Chode (Stand UP and Be Counted, or line up and be numbered - *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Semmens

Who decides what is excessive? Seems nobody has set the bar for excessive criticism of all other religions.

I guess Obama is going to protect the religion of his youth.


4 posted on 05/31/2013 9:23:18 PM PDT by doc1019 (There is absolutely no difference between pro-choice and pro-abortion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: John Semmens
“Fighting for the faith and slaying unbelievers is a religious obligation for Muslims,” Killian argued. “Verbal attacks on these beliefs and behaviors illegally denigrate the religious freedoms of Muslims. Just as our Constitution protects the Christians’ right to ‘turn the other cheek’ it also must protect the Muslims’ right to wage holy jihad. To the extent that Muslims are inhibited by hate speech targeting this right we will intervene.”

I find it hard to believe that anyone would support a people who murder those who don't embrace their religion. This guy must be absolutely insane.

5 posted on 05/31/2013 9:23:43 PM PDT by davisfh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Semmens

this guy needs a refresher course on the constitution, specifically the 1st amendment


6 posted on 05/31/2013 9:25:26 PM PDT by fellowpatriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Semmens

Our government is becoming the real and more immediate enemy


7 posted on 05/31/2013 9:26:48 PM PDT by GeronL (http://asspos.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Semmens

I thought that I had fairly good reading comprehension, but either I missed the intent of this story or Killian is totally nuts.

What I got from the story is that it is now against the law to point out that killing “non-believers” is not acceptable.

“Fighting for the faith and slaying unbelievers is a religious obligation for Muslims,” Killian argued. “Verbal attacks on these beliefs and behaviors illegally denigrate the religious freedoms of Muslims. Just as our Constitution protects the Christians’ right to ‘turn the other cheek’ it also must protect the Muslims’ right to wage holy jihad. To the extent that Muslims are inhibited by hate speech targeting this right we will intervene.”

How can any sane person spout such rot?

If this is the position of the DOJ, we are finished as a country.

We are ruled by idiots.


8 posted on 05/31/2013 9:27:33 PM PDT by old curmudgeon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Semmens

In reality, they’ll just have the IRS audit you and Homeland Security investigate you and all your associations.

If you own property or a business, a multitude of agencies will visit you. Resistance is futile!


9 posted on 05/31/2013 9:27:53 PM PDT by Tai_Chung
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Semmens
“Journalists are trained to be objective,” Durbin contended. “Ordinary citizens are not."

neither are most politicians

10 posted on 05/31/2013 9:27:59 PM PDT by fellowpatriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: davisfh

Hello...satire? Read the last sentence of the post.


11 posted on 05/31/2013 9:28:42 PM PDT by Mpatl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: John Semmens
As much as I'd like to lift the lid on Durbin's scalp and use his skull as a latrine, it appears that the special interests got to it long before I could. The damnedest thing is, nobody had the decency to flush.


12 posted on 05/31/2013 9:29:01 PM PDT by Viking2002
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: old curmudgeon

Well, Killian is nuts, as is his boss Holder, but it’s satire. Though it does sound like something he’d actually say.


13 posted on 05/31/2013 9:29:54 PM PDT by darkangel82
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: John Semmens

UK Shopkeeper Forced to Remove “Obey Our Laws” T-Shirts or Face Arrest (Guess why?)
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3026044/posts


14 posted on 05/31/2013 9:30:22 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (I'll raise $2million for Sarah Palin's next run. What'll you do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mpatl

Damn!!!

I got suckered again!


15 posted on 05/31/2013 9:30:27 PM PDT by old curmudgeon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: old curmudgeon

It was well written, and you were not the only one!


16 posted on 05/31/2013 9:33:28 PM PDT by Mpatl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: John Semmens

As usual with John’s satire, the reality is not far behind the satire.


17 posted on 05/31/2013 9:34:05 PM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marron

true.


18 posted on 05/31/2013 9:34:23 PM PDT by GeronL (http://asspos.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: John Semmens

“We have to be willing to abridge their right of free speech in order to protect their right of free speech”

It’s a damned strange world we’re living in...


19 posted on 05/31/2013 9:34:48 PM PDT by rockrr (Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Semmens

Semmens cutting pretty close to the bone as usual *bump*.


20 posted on 05/31/2013 9:45:57 PM PDT by Yardstick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-59 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson