doesn't matter what happens, the goathumpers are safety wired to the terrorist/murderous thug position anyway so fill in the blank... 
ping
doesn't matter what happens, the goathumpers are safety wired to the terrorist/murderous thug position anyway so fill in the blank... I find it hard to believe that anyone would support a people who murder those who don't embrace their religion. This guy must be absolutely insane.
this guy needs a refresher course on the constitution, specifically the 1st amendment
Our government is becoming the real and more immediate enemy
I thought that I had fairly good reading comprehension, but either I missed the intent of this story or Killian is totally nuts.
What I got from the story is that it is now against the law to point out that killing “non-believers” is not acceptable.
“Fighting for the faith and slaying unbelievers is a religious obligation for Muslims,” Killian argued. “Verbal attacks on these beliefs and behaviors illegally denigrate the religious freedoms of Muslims. Just as our Constitution protects the Christians’ right to ‘turn the other cheek’ it also must protect the Muslims’ right to wage holy jihad. To the extent that Muslims are inhibited by hate speech targeting this right we will intervene.”
How can any sane person spout such rot?
If this is the position of the DOJ, we are finished as a country.
We are ruled by idiots.
In reality, they’ll just have the IRS audit you and Homeland Security investigate you and all your associations.
If you own property or a business, a multitude of agencies will visit you. Resistance is futile!
neither are most politicians
UK Shopkeeper Forced to Remove “Obey Our Laws” T-Shirts or Face Arrest (Guess why?)
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3026044/posts
As usual with John’s satire, the reality is not far behind the satire.
“We have to be willing to abridge their right of free speech in order to protect their right of free speech”
It’s a damned strange world we’re living in...
Semmens cutting pretty close to the bone as usual *bump*.
Bring it on you rag head SOBs! My bullets are coated with pig fat!
but these days it's sometimes hard to tell.
John, I think you’re on to something. For a Muslim to slaughter American infidels is surely protected under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993. That Act permits Native Americans to use peyote for religious purposes.
Unwarranted acts of terror? What, does he think there are times when acts of terror by Muslims are warranted?
"...who, being themselves but fallible and uninspired men, have assumed dominion over the faith of others, setting up their own opinions and modes of thinking as the only true and infallible, and as such endeavoring to impose them on others, hath established and maintained false religions over the greatest part of the world, and through all time;...that it is time enough for the rightful purposes of civil government, for its officers to interfere when principles break out into overt acts against peace and good order; and finally, that truth is great and will prevail if left to herself, that she is the proper and sufficient antagonist to error, and has nothing to fear from the conflict, unless by human interposition disarmed of her natural weapons, free argument and debate, errors ceasing to be dangerous when it is permitted freely to contradict them. ""I HAVE SWORN UPON THE ALTAR OF GOD ETERNAL HOSTILITY TO EVERY FORM OF TYRANNY OVER THE MIND OF MAN"--The Virginia Act For Establishing Religious Freedom
--Thomas Jefferson, 1786
With your ability to mix truth and fiction, you might consider putting in a resume for Mister Holder's job (assuming that he heads for the exits sometime soon.)
.
