Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

STARVE THE BEAST: How to GO GALT and Avoid Paying Taxes (Without Moving or Quitting Your Job)
Reaganite Republican ^ | 08 November 2012 | Reaganite Republican

Posted on 11/08/2012 2:30:56 AM PST by Reaganite Republican

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-157 last
To: Red in Blue PA

Forgot to add one other thing I did. If we are to devolve into something like Greece (which I believe we will) then it is only prudent to adjust your investments accordingly. This past summer I sold most of my technology shares and moved into companies that guns, ammo, and generators, among other things.


141 posted on 11/09/2012 5:34:15 PM PST by Red in Blue PA (Read SCOTUS Castle Rock vs Gonzales before dialing 911!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: Red in Blue PA

Forgot to add one other thing I did. If we are to devolve into something like Greece (which I believe we will) then it is only prudent to adjust your investments accordingly. This past summer I sold most of my technology shares and moved into companies that guns, ammo, and generators, among other things.


142 posted on 11/09/2012 5:34:29 PM PST by Red in Blue PA (Read SCOTUS Castle Rock vs Gonzales before dialing 911!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: Bushbacker1
Why not claim 47 million! That's how many are on food stamps that we're paying for!

Your synopsis is correct, but adding two or more dependents shouldn't change ones tax withholding enough to hurt them come April 15.

Again, you are confusing claiming “dependents” on your tax return with claiming “allowances” or what is also known as withholding “exemptions” on your form W-4 for employment withholding. They are not one and the same. And BTW, I would have loved to have claimed my 3 cats and my slacker niece who I often loaned, i.e. gave money to, even when she and her two kids lived with me for over 2 years and I basically supported them, on my tax return, and I would have also loved to have claimed half of the City of Baltimore as “dependents” when I lived there, but I couldn’t.

On your W-4, you can claim as many withholding allowances/exemptions as you want, reduce your federal tax withholding to zero if you want; that is until you file your return and end up owing more than $1,000. And it doesn’t matter if you can write the US Treasury a check when you file your return on or before April 15th, if you exceed the $1,000 amount, the IRS can, except under some circumstances, still penalize and charge you interest for under withholding during the year. They can also fine you, even put you in jail for filing a fraudulent W-4 (although I don’t think that happens often except in cases where people repeatedly claim ridiculous and unsupportable number of withholding exemptions year after year as in an attempt to “evade” paying tax). Word to the wise; tax “avoidance” is perfectly legal as long as it is done legally, tax “evasion” however is always a crime comes with serious consequences.

That and they (IRS) can send your employer a “lock in letter” that states no matter what W-4 you have on file or what form W-4 “Bushbacker1” gives you after receipt of this letter, you will withhold “Bushbacker1” as Married with 1 Exception, period, until you receive a letter from us (the IRS) telling you otherwise.

Depending on one’s financial circumstances, the number of dependent and deductions they can legally claim on their 1040, pre-tax payroll deductions, etc., yes, absolutely claiming two or more “dependents” exemptions could put some folks in a situation of being seriously under withheld. Take for example a single person, un-married, no children, no mortgage interest, no other allowable deductions on their 1040, does not have any pre-tax payroll deductions for section 125 cafeteria plans, does not contribute to his employer’s 401k plan through pre-tax dollars but makes say a salary of 30k or more a year and has several thousands in an interest baring savings account, …. claiming even 3 or 4 exemptions on their W-4 could very well put them in a position of owing substantially more than $1,000 on April 15th.

I’m not advocating “feeding the beast” but am strongly advising you and everyone on this thread to be very cautious when “playing games” with their withholding on employment income.

What you really want to do is have the “Goldilocks” amount withheld from your paycheck – not so much that you get a big refund, i.e. provide the government with what is in effect an interest free loan on your money that you could have invested during the year, even in a savings account with a very small return – that is still a return; and not so little that you owe any more than a few dollars, no more than a $100 or so when you file your return. This takes some work and planning but it can be done. I advise people to look at the YTD’s on their paystubs, estimate their current and expected tax situation and estimate where they will be, each and every quarter and adjust their W-4 withholding accordingly as to get to the magic “Goldilocks Zone” at year end. For instance; last year I got a $10 refund from the IRS and owed $8 in PA State and local taxes. That’s where you want to be - as close to zero taxes refunded or owed as possible.

As a payroll professional with over 30 years of experience, I’ve seen it all. I’ve seen a good number of folks claiming over 10 exemptions or more (50 to 99 exemptions when I knew they were single or married with 1 kid) or claiming “Exempt” on their form W-4, even as I “gently” asked them if they really wanted to do that, only to get, sometimes several years later, an IRS and or State treasury wage garnishment and an IRS lock in letter for those very same people. Sadly I often see some of those very same people get child support orders, wage garnishments for defaulted student loans…trust me; it’s not pretty.

Recently we hired a new employee in sales. And it only took less than two weeks to get the child support withholding order (child support orders always take first priority, no matter when it is received). Then less than a week later, I got a California wage garnishment for unpaid state taxes, then another for local CA taxes, then an IRS garnishment and finally another child support order to enroll his child in all available health benefits. After the child support orders, there is not enough “discretionary” income to take anything for any of the other garnishments unless he earns a big commission in which case most of that will be taken in garnishment. Meanwhile, penalties and interest continue to accrue for every month that he doesn’t earn enough to have anything other than child support taken out. I feel bad for the guy but he’s in a hole so deep, he’ll be feeling this pain for a very, very long time.

Even absent child support or creditor or student loan wage garnishments, you really don’t want to get into a hole with the IRS and or on your state on taxes owed.

I’ve run across people like you who say; ”I want the absolute minimum amount or even zero to be withheld from my pay and I will just work it out and pay my taxes on April 15th.” Word to the wise – while I understand and empathize, this “tax strategy” often it does not end well.

143 posted on 11/09/2012 6:11:22 PM PST by MD Expat in PA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: free-n-TX

I hope business is ok for you. I’m a teacher now. Love the job, wouldn’t do anything else.


144 posted on 11/09/2012 8:19:40 PM PST by JCBreckenridge (They may take our lives... but they'll never take our FREEDOM!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: panaxanax

https://startpage.com/


145 posted on 11/09/2012 8:56:58 PM PST by superfries
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: MD Expat in PA

very informative post....thank you.


146 posted on 11/09/2012 9:18:12 PM PST by superfries
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: superfries
Thanks.

What people need to realize is that even if their income and number of dependents, overall financial situation does not change in 2013, the coming fiscal cliff; Taxmageddon, might mean that even if whatever they had withheld from employment income in 2012, years from 2008 forward, it may not be enough for 2013.

http://www.atr.org/days-taxmageddon-a7203

Now (2013) is not the time to have substantially less withheld from employment income if they think that by doing so, they are “giving it to the man”, “going Galt, “not feeding the beast”. Those that do may be in for a very nasty surprise on April 15, 2014.

147 posted on 11/10/2012 7:58:45 AM PST by MD Expat in PA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: NELSON111

I’ve done the same thing as you. However, I’ve gone one step further — I’m unfriending anyone who might prove to be an INFORMER (including one of my sisters) — yes, I believe that word will be coming back into vogue in the next year or so.


148 posted on 11/10/2012 1:38:06 PM PST by NewJerseyJoe (Rat mantra: "Facts are meaningless! You can use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: RavenATB
My advise would be to not step in a restaurant at all...and to avoid drive-through food, too.

Not sure I follow that logic. occasionally support local restaurants or if fast food make it Chic-Fil. don't stiff waitresses unless they make snarky comments about supporting Obama. when getting contracting & service work done use cash. in fact move more towards cash transactions

149 posted on 11/10/2012 4:50:20 PM PST by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: panaxanax; vanilla swirl; Jim Robinson
Better yet. Kill two birds with one stone.

Make only available to monthly donors or donors over a certain amount.

150 posted on 11/10/2012 4:54:52 PM PST by Drill Thrawl (We have crossed the line from independence & liberty to dependency & servitude. We are doomed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Mad Dawgg
It won't change your overall tax burden. If you owe taxes you'll just pay them on April 15th instead of early.

Not true. You have to pay a penalty if you owe too much at the end of the year.

http://www.irs.gov/taxtopics/tc306.html

151 posted on 11/10/2012 5:05:53 PM PST by Drill Thrawl (We have crossed the line from independence & liberty to dependency & servitude. We are doomed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: Washi
Don't most of us pay federal taxes by way of income tax?

You would be surprised at how many taxes and fees exist along with the income tax. Income tax only makes up 50% of federal revenue. Alcohol, tabacco, fuel and transaportation are just a few of the many examples.

http://www.ehow.com/about_5047991_federal-excise-tax.html

http://www.ehow.com/list_6575637_list-federal-excise-taxes.html

152 posted on 11/10/2012 5:10:28 PM PST by Drill Thrawl (We have crossed the line from independence & liberty to dependency & servitude. We are doomed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: Chipper
I know the investments will likely be dropping over the next 4 years, but it should decrease my taxable income.

But consider that with mister tax and spend more the rate you pay in the future may be higher than the rate you pay now. I'm not saying you should or shouldn't just consider the implications in both directions.

153 posted on 11/10/2012 5:13:32 PM PST by Drill Thrawl (We have crossed the line from independence & liberty to dependency & servitude. We are doomed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: Drill Thrawl
"Not true. You have to pay a penalty if you owe too much at the end of the year."

Try reading the entire post and then respond without cherrypicking phrases. They key word here is "legally."

154 posted on 11/10/2012 5:27:47 PM PST by Mad Dawgg (If you're going to deny my 1st Amendment rights then I must proceed to the 2nd one...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: Mad Dawgg

Don’t be a jerk. I was just passing along what I thought would be some useful info.


155 posted on 11/10/2012 6:53:05 PM PST by Drill Thrawl (We have crossed the line from independence & liberty to dependency & servitude. We are doomed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: Marylander

Well, I’ve already gone “galt” as they say. I have a ten-year-old car,and luckily have a son-in-law who is a mechanic with a dealer of the same kind of car I have. It has 225,000 miles on it, but runs like a new one. I have another son-in-law who is a commercial appliance repairman, and another son-in-law owns a bread route and I get my bread from him, and my son is an electrical engineer. I think I’m covered! I sold my house and moved in with my bachelor son, and we help each other with the expenses.

I don’t go to sit-down restaurants where I would have to leave a tip. We don’t have cable TV. I never go to movies. I never go to Starbucks. (I own a Keurig and always get my coffee pods on sale - about 50cents a cup). I get my hair cut about every two months at one of those discount shops, and I patronize the local Dollar Store.


156 posted on 11/10/2012 7:53:46 PM PST by MondoQueen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Reaganite Republican

please add me to your list


157 posted on 11/10/2012 9:49:49 PM PST by ResisTyr ("Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God " ~Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-157 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson