Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Breaking: We were right, Obama GAVE Iran the Drone!
Con Underground ^ | 12/10/2011

Posted on 12/09/2011 10:24:21 PM PST by Just4Him

A couple of days ago Conunderground.com was the first to point out that the circumstances surrounding the “crash” of the top secret RQ170 Sentinel drone simply didn’t add up. And we were tight! The story continues to develop and it doesn’t look good!

To recap, first we were told that Iran might’ve shot it down and then the story changed to “the drone crashed on Iranian soil ”

After realizing that the Iranians were about to parade a perfectly functional drone with nary a scratch on it, the official story changed to “the drone landed because it wants to live” I kid you not that is the official story!

The flack we caught for running the story was typical of the the kind of BS spewed by Obama’s supporters but none the less I didn’t withdraw the story because the official version simply didn’t add up.

The immediate and obvious questions were these: 1) Why didn’t we try to recover the drone? 2) In lieu of a rescue effort why didn’t we bomb it into oblivion? Apparently there was third option and Onama struk that down also.

THE ANSWERS WILL SHOCK YOU – or maybe not. Fox News National Security Correspondent Jennifer Griffin reported that apparently the Pentagon pleaded with Barrack Hussein Obama to give the order to do just that. The Pentagon initially wanted to send a special forces team to recover the drone. Obama shot down that suggestion. Then the Pentagon offered up plan B , blow it to kingdom come. Obama refused that too and now Iran and China have a brand spanking new fully functional top secret US RQ 170 Sentinel Drone.

The Drone was not recovered or destroyed specifically per Obama’s orders


TOPICS: Conspiracy
KEYWORDS: brainlessjoebiden; dnc4iran; dncassettransfer; dncrico; dnctreason; dncvsamerica; drone; drones; iran; iraq; islamisfascism; islamofascism; kenyanbornmuzzie; lebanon; obama457states; obama4iran; obama4mullahs; obamanation; shadowwars; threatmatrix; typicaltreason; yemen
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 181-196 next last
To: Bobalu

I agree with the possibility of what you describe and raise you one. In the Reagan years, we had a program to respond to the Soviet “Line X” program. It was NOT well-known within the CIA, and only Reagan and a handful of his most trusted CIA contacts knew of it. It permitted high tech designs to be “stolen” by the Soviets but this tech had built-in catastrophic design flaws that resulted in gigantic melt-downs after about a year. If, for example, this is something Petraeus and Panetta recommended as part of a “cheap” Iran strat, I could see it.


101 posted on 12/10/2011 5:25:06 AM PST by LS ("Castles made of sand, fall in the sea . . . eventually." (Hendrix))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: garjog
Second elected traitor. Clinton gave the Chinese ICBM guidance so their missiles could hit us, and the Klystron switch - so they could make thermonuclear and neutron warheads - so that those missile warheads would have something to do when they hit US cities.

While Clinton was impeached for a non-crime, many the the House and Senate were aware of his true crimes, but could not impeach him for treason, since treason is only a crime if committed in wartime against a declared enemy.

So it is for Obama. He is free to give away anything he chooses to whomever he chooses, as long as there is no declared war.

102 posted on 12/10/2011 5:25:38 AM PST by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Just4Him

103 posted on 12/10/2011 5:30:59 AM PST by SF_Redux (Sarah stands for accountablility and personal responsiblity, democrats can't live with that)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Little Pig

Coventry


104 posted on 12/10/2011 5:34:14 AM PST by Repeal The 17th (We have met the enemy and he is us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Just4Him

Somebody, somewhere, knows an awful lot more about what really happened they we are being told.

Those secrets are going to gnaw at his (their) conscience until the truth finally comes out.

Until that time, unfortunately, we’re going to suffer through a lot of conspiracy theories and speculation. The WH will never give us the truth and the military is full of people who have forgotten their oath in order to further their careers.


105 posted on 12/10/2011 5:48:40 AM PST by DNME (A monarch's neck should always have a noose around it. It keeps him upright. - Robert Heinlein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tanknetter

Considering the first report on 4Dec indicated the aircraft was was from the DoD/ISAF, then on 6Dec the reports further clarified this was not an ISAF bird, but instead belonged to the CIA makes me wonder a little.

If a spare intel resource swapped between buddies, then it wouldn’t be surprising if it were held together with ‘baling wire’, and it actually might be the real McCoy.

Considering the lack of discipline from White House down on how to report the incident, I suspect they don’t know what the hell is going on.

Looks like an early variant of the bird that was operational. White House behavior is all too consistent with somebody who doesn’t have a clue, but knows that whatever the solution is it couldn’t be to defend American interests.


106 posted on 12/10/2011 5:51:23 AM PST by Cvengr (Adversity in life and death is inevitable. Thru faith in Christ, stress is optional.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: Just4Him
F U B O
i'm gonna git you sucka
107 posted on 12/10/2011 6:02:59 AM PST by ßuddaßudd (7 days - 7 ways a Guero y Guay Lao << >> with a floating, shifting, ever changing persona)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Just4Him

"I don't care how. Get these assets to my 57 states."

108 posted on 12/10/2011 6:06:58 AM PST by Diogenesis ("Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. " Pres. Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: saintgermaine

That drone probably had a very special payload, Stuxnet’s younger brother. Can’t wait for them to download it and pass it to all our enemies.


109 posted on 12/10/2011 6:08:38 AM PST by rotstan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Bobalu
The drones may just be a cover story to deflect speculation about something much more amazing. And a captured drone could be a great way to mislead an adversary as to our technical level

That or Hussein is more evil than we thought.

110 posted on 12/10/2011 6:12:56 AM PST by bgill (The Obama administration is staging a coup. Wake up, America, before it's too late.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: unkus

“certain important people have been told not to cross the line or their families will be in danger.”

Concur wholeheartedly. Witness Trump’s sudden dropping out of the race, the Jack Wheeler case, lack of any credible COLB investigation by anyone, etc.


111 posted on 12/10/2011 6:14:27 AM PST by combat_boots (The Lion of Judah cometh. Hallelujah. Gloria Patri, Filio et Spiritui Sancto.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: LS

I see three possibilities:

1) Failure leading to the drone landing.
2) Iran/China jamming/overiding the controls.
3) Intentional grounding.

In scenario 1, the question needs to be asked why wasn’t the drone destroyed. If remote control failed, so might the self-destruct, but other options are available.

In scenario 2, we are in trouble.

In scenario 3, we have the advantage.


112 posted on 12/10/2011 6:15:05 AM PST by Erik Latranyi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: PIF

Once Clinton authorized the sale of the tool and die equipment, anyone with any sense knew he was willingly betraying the US.

I read a story on here a long time ago about a guy who was somewhere that Clinton happened to be. The guy said there was such an overpowering evil about the man that he turned and walked away.

I have been thinking about this for some time. Mika Brezhinski (can’t spell her name) had a tone of voice when ‘questioning’ Boone Pickens about what his earnings are that made me think of something last night—the scene in “Christmas Carol” of the women who robbed Scrooge’s apartment as he lay dead on the bed; in one of the movies, the women sounded like harpyish guttersnipes who would steal mother’s milk from a baby if they could get away with it. These same types of people are now our politicians, press, and ‘activists.’


113 posted on 12/10/2011 6:23:10 AM PST by combat_boots (The Lion of Judah cometh. Hallelujah. Gloria Patri, Filio et Spiritui Sancto.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: Erik Latranyi

One word, “Stuxnet”

The technology for flight is probably not a secret. What is in the computer is. Some Iranian computer geek will download the information and bang.

Knowing the CiIA, they probably put an “to download secret data, use cross connect cable” above the USB port.


114 posted on 12/10/2011 6:27:01 AM PST by EQAndyBuzz (To fix government, we need a rocket scientist. Oh, wait we have one!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: George Varnum

“our military probably has a really nasty selective Stalinesque PURGE coming in the near future.”

Let’s not forget that our nuclear submarine captains and other ships’ captains have been relieved of duty lickety split over the course of the last 2 years. 0bama is trying to put his assets in place so that there will be NO ONE who will exercise a true nuclear deterrent if/when we are attacked.

Ditto for the 3-letter folks.


115 posted on 12/10/2011 6:28:21 AM PST by combat_boots (The Lion of Judah cometh. Hallelujah. Gloria Patri, Filio et Spiritui Sancto.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard

LOL


116 posted on 12/10/2011 6:30:28 AM PST by Future Snake Eater (Don't stop. Keep moving!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: saintgermaine

I don’t think it needs a self destruct device. It simply needed to be programmed NOT to land in enemy territory. This craft is a technological marvel yet they neglected possibly the most obvious detail.


117 posted on 12/10/2011 6:32:23 AM PST by ryan71 (Dear spell check - No, I will not capitalize the "m" in moslem!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Erik Latranyi
People here give Obama too much credit. He's a Marxist, but not a very smart one and certainly not hard-working enough to spend the time absorbing the implications of a drone shootdown/failure.

Here is one possibility: the CIA has been planning something like this (or a "B" team within the CIA---remember, many of the CIA are lefties). They go to Obama and say, "Just give them the drone." Obama, not wanting to spend the time or energy to figure out if he's being used, or what the implications are, says, "Ummm, ok. I'm going to play golf."

118 posted on 12/10/2011 6:39:15 AM PST by LS ("Castles made of sand, fall in the sea . . . eventually." (Hendrix))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: ryan71
It simply needed to be programmed NOT to land in enemy territory.

I have a feeling that with all the flaws/viruses they are encountering, that such a program would blow up too many planes.

Failsafe mode is common in most automated equipment.

If it "autolanded" it probably ripped its landing gear off and damaged the underside, hence why they covered it up.

119 posted on 12/10/2011 6:40:00 AM PST by Erik Latranyi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: unkus

Shame they murdered Patton to stop him from being the president, world would of been a different place.


120 posted on 12/10/2011 6:49:29 AM PST by Bulwyf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 181-196 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson