Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: LS

I see three possibilities:

1) Failure leading to the drone landing.
2) Iran/China jamming/overiding the controls.
3) Intentional grounding.

In scenario 1, the question needs to be asked why wasn’t the drone destroyed. If remote control failed, so might the self-destruct, but other options are available.

In scenario 2, we are in trouble.

In scenario 3, we have the advantage.


112 posted on 12/10/2011 6:15:05 AM PST by Erik Latranyi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies ]


To: Erik Latranyi

One word, “Stuxnet”

The technology for flight is probably not a secret. What is in the computer is. Some Iranian computer geek will download the information and bang.

Knowing the CiIA, they probably put an “to download secret data, use cross connect cable” above the USB port.


114 posted on 12/10/2011 6:27:01 AM PST by EQAndyBuzz (To fix government, we need a rocket scientist. Oh, wait we have one!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies ]

To: Erik Latranyi
People here give Obama too much credit. He's a Marxist, but not a very smart one and certainly not hard-working enough to spend the time absorbing the implications of a drone shootdown/failure.

Here is one possibility: the CIA has been planning something like this (or a "B" team within the CIA---remember, many of the CIA are lefties). They go to Obama and say, "Just give them the drone." Obama, not wanting to spend the time or energy to figure out if he's being used, or what the implications are, says, "Ummm, ok. I'm going to play golf."

118 posted on 12/10/2011 6:39:15 AM PST by LS ("Castles made of sand, fall in the sea . . . eventually." (Hendrix))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson