Posted on 01/26/2010 8:34:13 AM PST by Beloved Levinite
THE FIVE THAT STAND AGAINST ALL AMERICANS, THE “MAFIA” JUDGES
By Gordon Duff STAFF WRITER/Senior Editor
Five members of the Supreme Court declared that a “corporation” is a person, not a “regular person” but one above all natural laws, subject to no God, no moral code but one with unlimited power over our lives, a power awarded by judges who seem themselves as grand inquisitors in an meant to hunt down all hertics who fail to serve their god, the god of money.
Their ruling has made it legal for foreign controlled corporations to flush unlimited money into our bloated political system to further corrupt something none of us trust and most of us fear. The “corporation/person” that the 5 judges, the “neocon” purists, have turned the United States over to isn’t even American. Our corporations, especially since our economic meltdown are owned by China, Russia and the oil sheiks along with a few foreign banks. They don’t vote, pay taxes, fight in wars, need dental care, breathe air, drive cars or send children to school. Anyone who thinks these things are people is insane. Anyone who would sell our government to them is a criminal and belongs in prison. There is nothing in the Constitution that makes this “gang of five” bribe sucking clowns above the law. There is nothing in the Constitution that even mentions corporations much less gives them status equal to or greater than the Executive, Legislative and Judicial branches of government.
The Supreme Court of the United States has no right to breathe human life into investment groups owned by terrorist sympathizers, foreign arms dealers or groups working for the downfall of the United States and everything we believe in, but 5 “justices” have done just that...
(Excerpt) Read more at veteranstoday.com ...
The whole Democrat Party is treason.
Gordon Duff sounds like a jackass.
No thanks.
The start of this article is over the top and I quit reading after that.
—first, try reading the First Amendment to the U. S. Constitution-—
why do they not see UNIONS in the same light as CORPORATIONS?
Can my neighbors and I not pool our resources, including the commercial resources which we control, and use these resources to promote a candidate or party or platform in which we believe?
The point about foreign (non-citizen) neighbors and I doing this is well-taken, however.
Why? So far I don't like the teaser and don't know why I'd give their site a hit.
I call for the immediate arrest of Gordon Duff.
No need to Beloved ... unless it's a satire.
Otherwise it's a steaming pantload of crap.
this is rich... like liberals really care about this stuff...
Gordon Duff, pfffft, most corporations in the US are small businesses owned and operated by one person or family. Why shouldln’t they be able to have the freedom to stand up and express what the government has done to them?
Where was the author when Obama campaign took in millions from overseas with no documentation?
I know BS when I see BS.
I also know BS when I smell it (or God forbid) step in it.
Therefor I have no desire to do any of the aformentioned
so I will go grocery shopping instead.
Okay, fellow FReepers...
I guess I’m having trouble understanding WHY this issue is important. WHY is it important that corporations have the same free speech rights as the rest of us? How is this supposed to impact me and my conservative beliefs?
I really don’t understand. I’m not against it, mind you...I just don’t see what the fuss is about.
Explanation, please?
Morning, Petronski. We heartily agree (on something). Gordon Duff sounds like a jackass. The law has said for decades that a corporation is a “person in contemplation of the law.” Where this hoopla got started about the SCOTUS “pronouncing” this fact recently, is a mystery.
Gordon Duff . . . Antonin Scalia . . . Gordon Duff . . . Antonin Scalia . . . .
Tough one to call. /s
More over the top hatred for corporations by useful idiots who spout left-wing talking points. This is no different than the demands to drive all religion behind closed doors. I guess it is alright for other groups of people (corporations are groups of people) like ACORN, International A.N.S.W.E.R. and MoveOn.org to take foreign donations and to influence elections? Whoever wants to defend this article then please explain why it is alright for certain groups of people to have free speech and for other groups of people to not.
Still helping Slick & his wife(/s) count all the money from the ChiComs, Ryiadi family etc.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.