Skip to comments.Q Anon: (2/21/18) Continued from Monday's thread. FRiendly Freeper Collaboration
Posted on 02/21/2018 12:06:33 AM PST by ransomnote
click here to read article
I’ll try and go back through the sequences to see what you’re talking about. I often spring board off of posts in my rants. I want to scan the rest of the responses, first.
Nothing new under the sun.
We’re talkin Cameron Kasky over here
And Nellie Ohr
Taken in the context of the late ‘60’s, early ‘70’s birth control in general and the birth control pill were a big deal.
You have a lot of discernment. I’d trust that. Dr Jerome Corsi, Dustin Nemos, April La June all seem to do an above average job of decoding, commenting on Q-Anon’s stuff.
I made one original comment on this thread, and that was to the OP. All the rest of my comments are responses to others, who have basically hectored me for daring to post a contrarian view about Q.
I was ‘one and done’, but people couldn’t bring themselves to just let me leave in peace.
You want this to keep going? Keep jumping down my throat for simply expressing my viewpoint.
Well put. Very well put.
CHI St. Joseph Health Grimes Hospital - approx 5 miles away
Baylor Scott & White Medical Center, Brenham - approx 10 miles. Described as a "Level 4 General Trauma Center"
OK. I commented about your seeming agreement with the more hyper contrarians merely because your stance was more similar to theirs—seemingly—than to mine and the stances of most of us who respect Q-Anon’s efforts so highly. It was merely a matter of you being 51% or more, in my impressions on that side of the divide. I wasn’t saying you were equal to the 95-100% hyper ventilating contrarians. Sorry if I came across that way.
Okay, you don’t have to join D-tube. Just go to the channel and it shows recommended videos for you - based on what you have watched previously.
Dustin has another there - https://d.tube/#!/v/nemosnews/s1f9dlbv
He is there under nemosnews
BTW, sometimes I spring board off of a post by a third party because some of us can hear input better about ourselves when we are overhearing it to a 3rd party.
Again ... because they MAY have been given clear instructions and warnings that if any rumors surface about them disclosing such, that they’ll be immediately behind bars, too.
Been meaning to look into this, electorals are based on how many house reps we have plus senators... so when they capped house reps at 435 in 1911... they screwed up the 12th amendment. Currently our electoral process should have almost 7000 votes instead of 538.
I doubt they’d be screaming if they were told that if rumors leaked out attributable to them, saying what they were told not to say—that then, they’d be immediately behind bars, too.
I hope I explained sufficiently why I tended to lump you in with others who are skeptical against Q-Anon's stuff. I did not, actually, in my mind, lump you in with the hyper contrarians but merely in the broad group decidedly skeptical against Q-Anon.
I'm characterized as having a lot of fierce pluck but I have not had sex change therapy and am NOT interested in any. My female genitals are fine the way they are. Besides, Qx has enough male fierceness for our household.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.