Former Official Will Cooperate With Investigators Probing Scheme Funneling Money From State To Kerry’s Daughter
Posted on 02/21/2018 12:06:33 AM PST by ransomnote
This thread is a friendly collaborative place for FReepers to analyze information and share opinons. FReepers have a wide variety of reasons for investigating Q Anon content; this is not the appropriate place to criticize or badger those who choose to use some of their time in this manner (i.e., personal attacks).
This thread is a continuation of the prior Q Anon thread located here:
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3633313/posts
I plan to post one thread at a time and ping new drops posted to it. The current schedule is to post new threads Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. When I post each (new) thread, the prior thread is retired and all new posts occur on the newest thread.
If you are new to Q Anon, the three links below provide overviews to help answer the questions, "Who is Q?" and "Why read Q drops?".
Q Anon: A Freeper's post re the "new Parallel Construct that Trump has created"
First post to “Q” ping list. Please read and let me know if you want off or on it
All Q "drops" (i.e., posts) can be read with their original formatting at this link:
You can locate my Q Anon threads by searching the key words "Q Anon" or "Qanon" using the search window in the upper right of the Free Republic's forum page. The active Q Anon thread will be shown at the top (newest) of the search results.
I stored links to many prior Q Anon threads in my profile page located here: http://freerepublic.com/~ransomnote/
Q drops (i.e., posts) often use acronyms. A few FReepers have begun to organize Q Anon information into helpful reference materials. Here is Swordmaker's list of acronyms for your reference: A FReeper list of acronyms used in Q Anon "drops."
SkyPilot has been collecting Q Anon information into one detailed post. His latest update is here:
http://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3633313/posts?page=163#163
President John F. Kennedy's excellent speech regarding secret societies, as well as comments about the press, is located at the following link. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zdMbmdFOvTs
A helpful FReeper passed along the following link. It’s to a group that goes live on Youtube when Q drops are released. I’ll put the link to their general Youtube “channel” here. When new Q drops are released, they start a new live stream video which remains active as long as they have new insights or information or guests to share information. You can look for any live stream videos in progress or recordings of their prior videos at the link.
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCWW3gYCvKS412p7o6qSK5gg
They were particularly to focus on decreasing, trashing the proven reputation of the authenticity of the Biblical record as history and as truth.
They were also tasked with discounting, trashing, arguing against the Deity of Jesus/Yeshua The Christ and arguing against His proven Resurrection.
Therefore, a long list of more traditional Christian church organizations have become liberal and too often little more than adjunct arms of Marxism around the world. ... cheering on the absurdities of "Liberation Theology."
Thankfully, God has slated for them to suffer His censure as they and their leadership crash and burn increasingly wholesale.
On the other hand--with different fingers--Pentecostal groups believing in the proven and accurate authority of The Bible in beliefs and practices of the Christian faith; in modern day miracles etc. etc. have been growing like wild-fire--e.g. in Brazil and other places.
Even in the formerly Christian nation called the USA, traditional churches have been losing congregants right and left and more Biblically authentic congregations and denominations have been growing.
Also, nondenominational congregations have increasingly sprung up and grown rapidly.
There is the interesting case of Rick Warren. He wrote a book--IIRC called THE PURPOSE DRIVEN LIFE ... became quite famous--made a ton of money and still lived on only a fraction of his income and still drove his older beat-up pickup or some such. He was fairly conservative, Biblically authentic etc.
Then something began happening to him--he began hobnobbing with OThuga, The Pope and a list of other not so Biblical religionists. Who knows what he still believes in his heart but most of us Evangelicals now consider him at least a little suspect.
We can't help but wonder if he was a liberal plant all along.
Here ya go:
Here's a VERY INTERESTING compilation of Brenden Dilley drops from his highly placed intel source. They confirm Q-Anon as legit and True Pundit Thomas Paine as having authentic info as well.
There's also confirmation of the Gitmo etc. military tribunals--at least 12 of them--and some encouraging stuff about the major elite perps that we all want to see crash and burn in a big way.
https://churchmousec.wordpress.com/2018/02/05/brendan-dilley-intel-source-part-1/
PART 2:
https://churchmousec.wordpress.com/2018/02/06/brendan-dilley-intel-source-part-2/
PART 3:
https://churchmousec.wordpress.com/2018/02/07/brendan-dilleys-intel-source-part-3/
PART 4:
https://churchmousec.wordpress.com/2018/02/08/brendan-dilleys-intel-source-part-4/
PART 5:
https://churchmousec.wordpress.com/2018/02/12/brendan-dilleys-intel-source-part-5/
I agree, we need him to win.
Couldn’t happen to a more deserving family. I’m pretty careful to avoid Heinz products nowadays. Don’t believe in giving money to treason, corruption and idiocy.
Kerry = mini Clinton.
Busted.
Bkmk
If I’m not mistaken, The Kerry’s have sold Heinz a few years ago. He didn’t know anything about ketchup and neither knew anything about running a business.
Yep. They sold for 28 Billion in 2013. Makes you wonder why they had to funnel $’s to the daughter from State. Hmmmm.
They and all the dogs they run with are evil to the core, imho.
The death of John Heinz was also ... unfortunate timing ;(
"The Attorney General has asked the Task Force (ATF, FBI, DEA, and the U.S. Marshals Service) to prioritize its study of efforts to interfere with our elections; efforts to interfere with our critical infrastructure; the use of the Internet to spread violent ideologies and to recruit followers; the mass theft of corporate, governmental, and private information; the use of technology to avoid or frustrate law enforcement; and the mass exploitation of computers and other digital devices to attack American citizens and businesses. The scope of the Task Force’s report is not limited to these categories"
Would calling the FBI creating false flags qualify as "frustrate law enforcement"
I find it highly unlikely that the left side of that engine has a paint scheme entirely mismatched to the right side. . . especially when the nose has the red, white, and blue bands centered and looking as if they are repeating on both sides.
A little research on Amtrak livery gives the answer: Amtrak engines are always painted symmetrically on both sides. The livery in the bottom photo is called "Chevron 7" and is in the process of being phased out. It is primarily being used for commuter trains of a different type than this train.
I think that is a replacement engine brought in to move this train to its destination after the "Flag Phase III" motif livery damaged engine we see in the top photo was removed as unserviceable.
The photo showing the engine in the bottom was taken hours later. The state of the crossing gate in this photo at this time cannot be dispositive of its State after the accident; they were already making repairs to the crossing in preparation to reopening the line and moving that minimally damaged train out of there. Nor do we, at this time, know how far the engine has moved the train itself in the process of removing the damaged engine or hooking up it’s replacement, These facts are unknown. However, looking at the top photo with what appears to be the damaged engine still connected to the passenger cars, I do not see the crossing at all. From that, we know the train was moved quite a bit before the second photo was taken.
Not Q but the Q research hosting board
Where is Jeff “the court is never in” Sessions?
I missed reading through a long string of the Q threads...
Can anyone tell me if the covfefe “gaff” has ever been discussed?
https://www.cnn.com/2017/05/31/politics/donald-trump-covfefe/index.html
Check out the dates, far before Q started posting,
The article above was 1st of June so tweet was that day or the day before I am guessing,
Then...
This bill (yes, you guessed it, the COVFEFE bill)
https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/2884
was introduced 6/12/17
LOL I have been saying he is 5 steps ahead continually...
BUT, they are still playing checkers and he is playing 4D chess
From the debris pattern, and the damage to the original engine, the train was traveling from our right to left in the above photo. Recall there was a curve as the train approached the crossing, and we can see there is no curve where the train is no sitting, so that is the exit from the approach. That’s the only way the the debris can be explained to be strewn from the crossing at the extreme right. The "pusher" engine was brought in to move the train from the rear, whether as a pusher or to pull it back the way it came.
I see it was introduced by a Dem. maybe they were just trolling him after his twitter typo?? I would agree it is probably a needed bill, to bring us up with current times and a proper bill, I assumed it would anyway and think it ALL should be a part of the presidential record.
Well, those two documents made for jaw dropping reading.
For those without time to read the docs:
The memos exchanged in the 70’s reflect the fully-fledged entitlement and power of the CIA (out of control and answers to no one, lies on demand). When asked if the CIA employs journalists, a song and dance ensues and no real information is ever relayed.
Regarding the other document re the intel committee in the 90’s, I don’t know why Ted Koppel didn’t end up with a bullet in his head later for stating the truth during the committee meeting (wasn’t the CIA director still there?).
The swamp maneuvers seem child-like in a way. The feigned shock (SHOCK) that anyone should be discussing the topic of CIA using journalists, clergy and Peace Corp at all (ever), the assertion on the part of the CIA Director that his actions must not be overseen by anyone, ever. The director doubled down by suggesting any CIA director who needed any oversight at all was clearly one who needed to be replaced with one who didn’t. Unelected, unlimited, unaccountable and in my opinion, unAmerican.
Ted Koppel pointed to one of the elephants among the herd in the room by saying the CIA had, at that point in time, a well-established history of doing whatever it wanted, ignoring the rules, and getting away with it.
No one ever addressed the elephants having to do with Project Mocking Bird and the real history and intentions of the CIA. The conversation centered on ridiculous exemplars (what if a journalist had intel that could save the lives of hostages or prevent a nuclear attack?) without ever nearing the terrain of the CIA preying on the American public with disinformation and worse.
Terry Anderson rightly said that it was unlikely a journalist would keep life saving information to themselves (so why would the CIA “need” to enlist the aid of journalists). That statement indirectly hi-lighted one of the larger elephants in the room- the CIA’s indirect implication that journalists don’t share their information or are prone to keeping the most important information from everyone.
Aldeman was a piece of work. He said that Ted Koppel’s belief that historically the CIA breaks the law and gets away with it must mean Ted was in a “time warp” because that was a problem in the 70’s (no mention of Project Mockingbird in the 50’s or all the intervening years to the time of the hearing). Aldeman also asserted that Ted’s concern that affiliation with the CIA would taint journalism’s reputation was misguided; instead, Aldeman asserts that the public views the media with distaste and the CIA with great respect, so such an affiliation could only benefit journalism’s reputation. You really can’t make this stuff up! The CIA is known for its self-interest, but no one in the room would dare suggest that such favorable polling information was the product of CIA propaganda.
Why was that information and the memo wherein the CIA refuses to cooperate with oversight classified? I suppose to ensure the unfettered dominance of the CIA until it had complete control of our country and her people.
The CIA and television companies had already gone before congress in the 50’s regarding Project Mockingbird and said whatever they needed to say to escape accountability. They were exposed 20 years later in the 70’s but that didn’t stop them. They were exposed in the 90’s (this hearing material) and that didn’t stop them. They have grown unchecked with an ever increasing sense of entitlement and autonomy. I’m sure the CIA didn’t want the public to know the soft coup was in progress until it was complete. The hearing in the 90’s proved the CIA’s manipulation of the American public’s perceptions discovered in the 50’s was only the tip of the CIA’s aspirations.
I picture the journalistic version of the Keystone Cops right about now. Panic when they think he’s being prosecuted and more panic when they realized they’ve been trolled. Fake but accurate...panic.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.