Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Q Anon: (2/21/18) Continued from Monday's thread. FRiendly Freeper Collaboration ^ | 2/21/2018 | Q Anon, Vanity

Posted on 02/21/2018 12:06:33 AM PST by ransomnote

This thread is a friendly collaborative place for FReepers to analyze information and share opinons. FReepers have a wide variety of reasons for investigating Q Anon content; this is not the appropriate place to criticize or badger those who choose to use some of their time in this manner (i.e., personal attacks).

This thread is a continuation of the prior Q Anon thread located here:

I plan to post one thread at a time and ping new drops posted to it. The current schedule is to post new threads Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. When I post each (new) thread, the prior thread is retired and all new posts occur on the newest thread.

If you are new to Q Anon, the three links below provide overviews to help answer the questions, "Who is Q?" and "Why read Q drops?".

Is Trump Staging a Counter-Coup? [Q explained?]>
Note: The above thread has been locked for disruptive comments, but post #1 includes a strong, concise Who/What/Where overview.

Q Anon: A Freeper's post re the "new Parallel Construct that Trump has created"

First post to “Q” ping list. Please read and let me know if you want off or on it

All Q "drops" (i.e., posts) can be read with their original formatting at this link:

You can locate my Q Anon threads by searching the key words "Q Anon" or "Qanon" using the search window in the upper right of the Free Republic's forum page. The active Q Anon thread will be shown at the top (newest) of the search results.

I stored links to many prior Q Anon threads in my profile page located here:

Q drops (i.e., posts) often use acronyms. A few FReepers have begun to organize Q Anon information into helpful reference materials. Here is Swordmaker's list of acronyms for your reference: A FReeper list of acronyms used in Q Anon "drops."

SkyPilot has been collecting Q Anon information into one detailed post. His latest update is here:

President John F. Kennedy's excellent speech regarding secret societies, as well as comments about the press, is located at the following link.

A helpful FReeper passed along the following link. It’s to a group that goes live on Youtube when Q drops are released. I’ll put the link to their general Youtube “channel” here. When new Q drops are released, they start a new live stream video which remains active as long as they have new insights or information or guests to share information. You can look for any live stream videos in progress or recordings of their prior videos at the link.

TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: fantasy; itsallbs; makebelieve; notthisagain; q; qanon; russianpropagandists; russianpuppets; russianstooges; russiasucks; sessions; trustsessions
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 461-480481-500501-520 ... 1,201-1,220 next last

That’s an illogical fallacy. It would make me happy if I was wrong about Q, and if I was wrong, it wouldn’t make me a closed minded troll.
A controlled opposition psyop is designed to immobilize us, thinking that white hats have it under control, when in fact, we should be marching in the millions to prevent this coup.
I have followed Q since week 1, and my doubts have only grown. George Soros is not in gitmo. Neither is Tony Podesta.
Contorting the posts to fit Revelation is milleniallism, which has cost Christians dearly.
Having said all that, I am more optimistic than I was at the end of the summer, but the danger is still extremely high with the dirty cop Mueller running his sham investigation.

481 posted on 02/21/2018 9:11:53 PM PST by spyone (ridiculum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]


Well...I have had little sleep the last 5 days so that’s my story and I’m stickin’ with it... LOL ...seriously tired!

482 posted on 02/21/2018 9:21:16 PM PST by Faith65 (Isaiah 40:31)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 479 | View Replies]

To: tiki

Only if q is proven 100% legit.

Q is probably the Russian troll farm.

483 posted on 02/21/2018 9:23:04 PM PST by for-q-clinton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 419 | View Replies]

To: Steven W.
1. a person who loves, supports, and defends his or her country and its interests with devotion.
2. a person who regards himself or herself as a defender, especially of individual rights, against presumed interference by the federal government.
1. a person who betrays another, a cause, or any trust.
2. a person who commits treason by betraying his or her country.

Wow that looks like he just defined a group of our old FRiends that are now actively working against us and/or trying to distract us...

484 posted on 02/21/2018 9:23:19 PM PST by AzNASCARfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 380 | View Replies]


Here is an hours worth of Q Proof if anybody is interested

485 posted on 02/21/2018 9:26:33 PM PST by AzNASCARfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 484 | View Replies]

To: Steven W.

Thanks for insight.

486 posted on 02/21/2018 9:56:51 PM PST by TEXOKIE (We must surrender only to our Holy God and never to the evil that has befallen us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 468 | View Replies]

To: Steven W.; generally; Axenolith; bagster; 60Gunner; ransomnote
I have to ask you guys a question. Q said trust sessions.
Now they say.
AG Sessions.
US Cyber Task Force.

Then post numbers 803 and 804 suggest some kind of network
system was turned on today for the first time.

What happened today on Twitter, Youtube and so on?
Who are being targeted?
Who are not being targeted?

487 posted on 02/21/2018 9:59:32 PM PST by Steve Van Doorn (*in my best Eric Cartman voice* 'I love you, guys')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 470 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

Still waiting for the tiniest bit of evidence from you...

488 posted on 02/21/2018 9:59:56 PM PST by TXnMA ("Allah": Satan's current alias; "0bama": Allah's stooge; "Moderate Muslims": Allah's useful idiots.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 269 | View Replies]

NOTE: NN = 1--99

When setting your size parameter, you can also set it as an absolute in number of pixels in width you want it to be, rather than a percentage of its original size. Doing pixel sizing gives you better control of the resulting size on screen.

To do that use the same command as before but omit the "%" and the NNNN would be the number of pixels wide you want the image to be on screen.

For example if you want your image to be 640 pixels wide:

<img src="URL" WIDTH="640">

Would give you that result.

489 posted on 02/21/2018 10:01:43 PM PST by Swordmaker (My pistol self-identifies as an iPad, so you must accept it in gun-free zones, you racist, bigot!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: bagster; ransomnote

Making sure you see the new drop.

490 posted on 02/21/2018 10:03:03 PM PST by Becki (Watch and pray)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 473 | View Replies]

To: Steve Van Doorn

See earlier posts, last night & today - I posted the DOJ task force announcement and it mentioned elections and practically anything else that might make an interesting target along with provisions for most of the DoJ entities including U.S. Marshalls; they’re supposed to report back by June. Then, yesterday, Trump signed a memo that gives full power to T-Rex + Mad dog & Coats to do whatever they need to do with full power by POTUS. re Twitter + YT - they are doing a significant purge against conservatives + libertarians.

491 posted on 02/21/2018 10:24:28 PM PST by Steven W.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 487 | View Replies]

To: JockoManning

Why has no one protested from the Podesta Team? someone muxt have a reason to talk. Just an observation.

492 posted on 02/21/2018 10:26:29 PM PST by DrDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 430 | View Replies]

To: Becki

Imagine ... you’re one of HRC + Obama cadres ... you know the fake news is fake ... when the phone rings, “Did you hear? That ‘Q’ just started the DAY OF RECKONING!”. Who you gonna call? Genius. ROFLMAO ;)

493 posted on 02/21/2018 10:26:31 PM PST by Steven W.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 490 | View Replies]

To: Becki; ransomnote

Feb 21 2018 21:47:02


ID: 403fc2

Why are the above [public declassified docs] highly protected?


494 posted on 02/21/2018 10:31:08 PM PST by bagster (Even bad men love their mamas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 490 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

Feb 21 2018 21:47:02

ID: 403fc2

Why are the above [public declassified docs] highly protected?


Feb 21 2018 21:53:06


ID: 403fc2

Scroll through both docs.

495 posted on 02/21/2018 10:34:16 PM PST by bagster (Even bad men love their mamas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 494 | View Replies]

To: reasonisfaith
I’ve been a big fan of anti school. What got him banned?

Dustin Nemos thinks it's about all those who covered student David Hogg and his friends and questioning if they were crisis actors or not. Hogg has been out in front on all kinds of interviews with his gun control message.

He was even filming as the shooting incident was going on and it was heavily edited and sounded more like a PSA for gun control than a shooting happening in real time. People mentioned Twitter was doing the same thing.

These good people being banned must be over the target as these crazy leftists want the gun control message to get out there, unopposed.


496 posted on 02/21/2018 10:37:03 PM PST by Conservative Gato (There are NOW 4 kind of LIES; Lies, Damned Lies, Statistics, and the Media.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 395 | View Replies]

To: bagster
Interesting quote from a memo from Congress to CIA in 1977.

"I do consider it noteworthy, however, that on November 30, 1973, the Washington Star-News reported that the CIA employed some forty journalists who doubled as undercover contacts.

The back and forth series of memos from Congress to CIA claim that the list of forty CIA employed journalists was known but not released to the public at the time.

The CIA promised to cease and desist the program of running journalists.

Why are the above [public declassified docs] highly protected?

Because obviously the CIA is back in the running of the media, if in fact they ever truly got out of the business.

497 posted on 02/21/2018 10:42:04 PM PST by bagster (Even bad men love their mamas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 494 | View Replies]

To: BlueMondaySkipper
It’s a religious thread. Please say no more...


You're coming awful close to admitting what many have suspected.

498 posted on 02/21/2018 10:44:42 PM PST by Windflier (Pitchforks and torches ripen on the vine. Left too long, they become black rifles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 385 | View Replies]

To: bagster
Not only that, these documents state that the CIA had "clergymen" on their payroll as well.

The CIA has been running things for a while now. I thought their mission was FOREIGN intelligence. Am I mistaken?

499 posted on 02/21/2018 10:45:02 PM PST by bagster (Even bad men love their mamas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 497 | View Replies]

To: bagster

p.s. Interesting how a 14 year old larper got his mitts on those documents, isn’t it?

500 posted on 02/21/2018 10:51:34 PM PST by bagster (Even bad men love their mamas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 499 | View Replies]

Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 461-480481-500501-520 ... 1,201-1,220 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson