Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Steven W.
Steve you talking about this:

"The Attorney General has asked the Task Force (ATF, FBI, DEA, and the U.S. Marshals Service) to prioritize its study of efforts to interfere with our elections; efforts to interfere with our critical infrastructure; the use of the Internet to spread violent ideologies and to recruit followers; the mass theft of corporate, governmental, and private information; the use of technology to avoid or frustrate law enforcement; and the mass exploitation of computers and other digital devices to attack American citizens and businesses. The scope of the Task Force’s report is not limited to these categories"

Would calling the FBI creating false flags qualify as "frustrate law enforcement"

531 posted on 02/22/2018 12:43:48 AM PST by Steve Van Doorn (*in my best Eric Cartman voice* 'I love you, guys')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 491 | View Replies ]


To: generally
read post 531:
"the use of technology to avoid or frustrate law enforcement"

This is about the Cyber Task Force. Can you make sense of this statement? What does frustrate me? Wouldn't it frustrate the FBI when people claim they're contributing to the false flags?

If so wouldn't that suggest this purge might be something to do with this Cyber task force?

555 posted on 02/22/2018 4:11:10 AM PST by Steve Van Doorn (*in my best Eric Cartman voice* 'I love you, guys')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 531 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson